1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

A scathing review of 'The History of the Machine Gun'

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by Drizzt, Sep 9, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Drizzt

    Drizzt Member

    Dec 24, 2002
    Moscow on the Colorado, TX
    The History of the Machine Gun
    FOCUSFilm Entertainment // Unrated // $14.98 // September 11, 2007

    Review by Paul Mavis | posted September 7, 2007 |

    Focusfilm Entertainment is releasing The History of the Machine Gun, a three-hour documentary produced by the Canadian version of The Discovery Channel in 1999. While most regular Discovery Channel viewers would assume by its title that The History of the Machine Gun is just that: a history of the invention, production and utilization of that weapon, The History of the Machine Gun spends much more of its time on historical context filtered through a decidedly leftist viewpoint. It certainly can't be considered a detailed look at the weapon (only four or five models are discussed in passing), coming off as a generalized history lesson interested more in attacking the West rather than discussing its intended subject.

    The History of the Machine Gun starts off well, with its approach of discussing the machine gun in terms of how it had dramatically altered the nature of armed conflict - as well as the resulting political landscape - a good framework for examining the weapon itself. All of the early highlights of the weapon's development are here, including Gatling's first prototypes and later refinements, as well as Hiram Maxim fully automated, gas-powered breakthrough in 1884.

    But as this early chapter of The History of the Machine Gun unfolds (it's broken into three, one-hour segments: White Smoking Devil, The Gun Comes Home, and The Age of the A.K.), it becomes clear that The History of the Machine Gun has other things on its mind besides examining the machine gun. A long discussion of colonial expansion is undertaken (with the effects of the machine gun in those conflicts overplayed, as they often are), which segues into a look at the slaughter of WWI, where much is made of the colonial powers getting a "taste of their own medicine" when it comes to the horrific effects of the machine gun (with America's ruthless efficiency through Ford's assembly line getting equal blame for the mass production of weapons). The effects of aerial machine guns are briefly mentioned, but no specifics are drawn other than looking at the synchronization problems associated with the propeller-driven planes.

    After the war, the Thompson "Tommy gun" machine gun in America is discussed. Rockefeller's use of it during the Ludlow massacre in 1914 is mentioned in passing. The film disingenuously suggests that the murder victims were killed by a machine gun; in actuality, the women and children died from suffocation from a fire. We then move on to a look at Prohibition, gangsters, consumers purchasing the Tommy, and labor unrest in America put down by the Tommy (although there are no figures given as to how many striking laborers were actually killed by the Tommy gun). Again, a cursory look is given to the Tommy itself, but the emphasis of The History of the Machine Gun is clearly on attacking Western - specifically American - society and its politics. When discussing the Prohibition era, gangsters are described in terms of misfits rebelling against an uncaring society (instead of as criminal psychotics who murdered innocent people), while the average American who purchased a gun is seen as the unwitting dupe of a marketing campaign to sell war surplus.

    When it comes time to look at WWII, there's a brief discussion of the cheaply produced, crude German MP-38 and MG-42 machine guns. The main point of this section appears to be emphasizing the dangers of such a cheaply produced machine gun falling into the hands of the regular solider, setting up the remainder of the documentary as a warning call for the proliferation of the machine guns. Which of course is odd, because the following segments glorify the development and use of the Russian AK-47 as the "people's weapon," an easily-reproduced and repairable weapon that "freedom fighters" all over the world have used to challenge the corrupt West. Kalashnikov, the inventor of the AK-47, is lionized (while American inventors Gatling and Thompson were given much less deferential treatment), with The History of the Machine Gun slipping into genuine delusion during the Vietnam era when the Vietcong are heralded as "freedom fighters." A former Vietcong fighter is profiled, where she describes the barbarism of American troops - but leaves out some of the more colorful Vietcong practices - before detailing her exploits as a prostitute (what any of this has to do with the history of the machine gun is unclear).

    The Russians and Afghanistans are looked at next (with America again slammed for supplying arms to the rebels), while the final section on urban American violence seeks to bizarrely blame the police for developing SWAT teams and arming themselves on a scale equal to gang members; evidently, according to The History of the Machine Gun, cops defending themselves contributes to the public feeling that there is no more law and order.

    The History of the Machine Gun alternates archival footage with "talking heads" interviews, ranging from politicians like John Bolton and Alan Clark (former U.K. Defense Minister), to historians like Professor Carroll Pursell and Professor Eric Hobsbaun, to director John Milius and certifiable loony, Noam Chomsky. The History of the Machine Gun is utterly predictable in its construction, alternating these two sources of information on a regular and predictable basis, linked by an unenthusiastic narration. All in all, it's a rather desultory affair, particularly at the protracted three hour length.

    The DVD:

    The Video:
    The full screen transfer for The History of the Machine Gun isn't the greatest, with a grainy, soft image and compression issues.

    The Audio:
    The Dolby Digital English 2.0 stereo mix is more than enough for the dialogue-heavy The History of the Machine Gun.

    The Extras:
    There are no extras for The History of the Machine Gun.

    Final Thoughts:
    Hey, if your tastes run towards Marxist-Leninist social and economic theories about greedy capitalist Western countries battling innocent "nationalistic" freedom fighters, then The History of the Machine Gun should be right up your socialist collective commune's alley. Enjoy that rental (or better yet; borrow it from the local library and stick it to those evil capitalist DVD corporations). But if you're looking for a straight documentary on the invention, production and implementation of the machine gun - as the title of The History of the Machine Gun surely suggests - you would do well to look elsewhere. Skip The History of the Machine Gun.


    Paul Mavis is an internationally published film and television historian, a member of the Online Film Critics Society, and the author of The Espionage Filmography

  2. statelineblues

    statelineblues Member

    Jul 9, 2006
    In PA
  3. Hutch

    Hutch Member

    Dec 28, 2002
    Opelika, AL
    Tommy guns used in 1914???? REALLY???? What a bit of researching genius!

    ROMAK IV Member

    Jul 20, 2007
    WOW!!! If we could just get Al Queda to give up machine guns, we could settle the whole Jihad thing with Nerf shooters.
  5. Leanwolf

    Leanwolf Member

    Mar 25, 2006
    No mention of the "evil capitalist running dog machine gun inventor " John M. Browning???

    Geeez, the DVD ain't hardly complete, huh?


    ABTOMAT Member

    Feb 23, 2006
    This reminds me of an NPR radio feature a few years ago. The teaser was something like "Mikhail Kalashnikov celebrates his 85th birthday." The actual show was just dragging out this one guy they have who only spouts technically incorrect anti-gun nonsense out for 15 minutes blathering about AK-47s being weapons of mass destruction.
  7. Checkman

    Checkman member

    Sep 23, 2003
    Please note that this was a Canadian production. No more need be said. In my opinion much of that country sold it's soul to the left decades ago. Our good neighbor to the north.
  8. Tommygunn

    Tommygunn Member

    Jun 14, 2006
    Morgan County, Alabama

    Indeed. While the Thompson was designed during WW1 as the proverbial "trench broom," the closest it got to the battlefield was a dock in New York City. The war was over before the guns left America.
    They were also pretty much a commercial failure. Silly ads portrayed them being used by cowboy like figures against cattle rustlers. But they cost $200 dollars apiece and back then, few people could afford them ... and I suppose many who could had better things to spend their dollars on where guns were concerned.
    Last edited: Sep 9, 2007
  9. JLelli

    JLelli Member

    Jan 18, 2007
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Not only were the guns expensive back then, ammunition was much more expensive than it is today (adjusting for inflation, of course). That's definately a concern for a gun with a 50-round magazine and a cyclic rate (for the Model of 1921) of nearly 1,000 rounds per minute. Also, people back then generally had much less disposable income to spend on things like machine guns than people today, even before the Depression.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page