Accurate .22 LR suggestions
- Thread starter dog gone it
- Start date
- Status
ColtPythonElite
Member
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2011
- Messages
- 10,477
They are not difficult to break down.
Ha! Tell that to my MKIII which absolutely WILL NOT separate the upper from the lower without the use of a mallet! And if you do have a looser gun, I agree that break down is not difficult, but re-assembly is a rite of passage. No, it's not particularly hard, but requires attention to detail.
ColtPythonElite
Member
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2011
- Messages
- 10,477
True, the receiver is a tight fit at first. They usually loosen after a few times. Most of my MKs can be yanked apart by hand. As far as the rest goes, they are simple once you understand what goes where.
greenmtnguy
Member
Alot of good suggestions here. I do agree that the Ruger Mk II or even Mk III has some advantages over it, I would also suggest taking a look at the S&W 22A, especially if you are on a budget. It doesn't have as good a trigger as the Ruger, but is pretty accurate, already has a built in rail for optics if you're going that route, and it is certainly easier to take down and clean. It isn't as nice looking as some of the MkII/III guns either, IMO, but mine shoots pretty well. I think I like the grip position/angle on the Rugers better, but the S&W works well, especially if you have large hands
tactikel
Member
I know I'll get flamed for this, but a Beretta Neos will shoot better than you can, is easy to swap barrels, grips, and even has a carbine option. Comes with an integral rail, barrel comes off in less than a minute. I bought one for my wife to learn shooting, she loves it-she shot a BRICK of .22Lr in just over 1 hour with me reloading for her. She shot at charcoal brickettes from 10 to 25 yards and smoked 'em. A great gun for the money. Be sure to hold one to see of it fits your hand.
Iron Sight
Member
Did anyone suggest a Mark series Ruger? 
Nom de Forum
Member
A used S&W 41 may be good for you to consider. They feel and shoot great in my hand.
Confederate
Member
Can't Go Wrong With Ruger
Two suggestions...or three, really
I like the Ruger Single-Six revolver, which takes both standard .22LR and .22WMR. It's a great pistol and is both reliable and accurate.
Also recommended is the Ruger Mark series (as others have said). The stainless versions of these guns are outstanding. There's also a Mark III available with a .45 1911 grip, but some people say they aren't as reliable as the standard models.
Finally, whatever gun you get, I recommend Paco Kelly’s Improved ACU-RZR and NASTINOSE Rimfire Bullet Tool. If you tell Paco what gun/s you have, he can send you a custom tool. For example, if you go with a Single-Six, the chambers and barrel accommodate two slightly different bullets. This isn't a problem for most people (most guns shoot far more accurately than the people shooting them), but Paco's tool will give you match grade results from standard cheap ammo. The same thing holds true for the Mark series. You'll get maximum accuracy, and Paco's a decent and honest person who stands by his work.
You can read more about it here. In these days it's hard to find ammo sometimes. Being able to take two calibers can be handy.
Two suggestions...or three, really
I like the Ruger Single-Six revolver, which takes both standard .22LR and .22WMR. It's a great pistol and is both reliable and accurate.
Also recommended is the Ruger Mark series (as others have said). The stainless versions of these guns are outstanding. There's also a Mark III available with a .45 1911 grip, but some people say they aren't as reliable as the standard models.
Finally, whatever gun you get, I recommend Paco Kelly’s Improved ACU-RZR and NASTINOSE Rimfire Bullet Tool. If you tell Paco what gun/s you have, he can send you a custom tool. For example, if you go with a Single-Six, the chambers and barrel accommodate two slightly different bullets. This isn't a problem for most people (most guns shoot far more accurately than the people shooting them), but Paco's tool will give you match grade results from standard cheap ammo. The same thing holds true for the Mark series. You'll get maximum accuracy, and Paco's a decent and honest person who stands by his work.
You can read more about it here. In these days it's hard to find ammo sometimes. Being able to take two calibers can be handy.
Confederate
Member
Never had any problems with Paco's tool, except it improved accuracy out to a hundred yards. It was also time consuming, but with the new tool, it should be faster. If you have a story, I prefer making a long story long. Cheers!
I'd say any of the "squirt gun" style classic .22s will work just fine. Look at the Ruger MkIII and 22/45, Browning Buck Mark, S&W 22A, Beretta Neos, and maybe an old Colt Woodsman if you can find one. The SIG-Hammerli Trailsides are also excellent pistols, as already mentioned, they're just a bit hard to find. They're all very accurate as it's difficult to screw up a fixed-barrel blowback .22 when it comes to accuracy.
As for barrel length, a longer barrel will increase velocity and make the projectile shoot flatter, and the longer sight radius will make it easier for you to make accurate shots, but it won't make the gun itself any more accurate. At the ranges you're typically firing a handgun, the slightly flatter trajectory won't make a noticeable difference, and the sight radius is irrelevant if you're using an optic.
That said I personally recommend a 5-6" Browning Buck Mark. A Contour 5.5 would make an excellent small game pistol.
As for barrel length, a longer barrel will increase velocity and make the projectile shoot flatter, and the longer sight radius will make it easier for you to make accurate shots, but it won't make the gun itself any more accurate. At the ranges you're typically firing a handgun, the slightly flatter trajectory won't make a noticeable difference, and the sight radius is irrelevant if you're using an optic.
That said I personally recommend a 5-6" Browning Buck Mark. A Contour 5.5 would make an excellent small game pistol.
MCgunner
Member
My most accurate .22 is a 10 inch Contender. My Ruger MkII is my most accurate repeater.
CraigC
Sixgun Nut
Ruger or Browning, pick your poison. Either should deliver a half inch at 25yds with preferred loads. Both are excellent and your grandchildren will be trying to wear them out. I typically prefer the Browning but the 22/45RP is a wonderful pistol and comfy too, unlike its predecessors.
Exactly!
cdb1
Member
If you are wanting a rifle, with your budget it would be a CZ for me. In a handgun I'm partial to the Buck Mark.
Delford
Member
+1 tactikel. I've only shot a 1.5" group with mine. Sure is fun to empty those 10 round mags I practice with golf balls on a line at self defense distance. I am improving. My friend's Mark II is a bit finicky but very accurate when working properly.
I practice with golf balls on a line at self defense distance. I am improving. My friend's Mark II is a bit finicky but very accurate when working properly.
Last edited:
plexreticle
Member
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2006
- Messages
- 1,240
If $500 is top dollar then get a Ruger Mk series and install a VQ or Clark accurizing kit. Mk3 requires a bushing if you want to remove the magazine disconnect. It's an easy install. Ruger Mks have a cult like following for a reason.
You're not going to touch a T/C for under $500 unless you find the deal of the century. You might find a Trailside for under $500 but be prepared to wait.
$500 limit for a rifle I would look at a CZ 452 or a used Anschutz 64.
Accurizing by resizing ammo in a die is snake oil imo.
You're not going to touch a T/C for under $500 unless you find the deal of the century. You might find a Trailside for under $500 but be prepared to wait.
$500 limit for a rifle I would look at a CZ 452 or a used Anschutz 64.
Accurizing by resizing ammo in a die is snake oil imo.
- Status
