Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

AG Holder fires back at NRA and others - Proj Gunrunner

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by usmarine0352_2005, May 4, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. usmarine0352_2005

    usmarine0352_2005 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2005
    Messages:
    2,797
  2. Frogomatik

    Frogomatik Member

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2011
    Messages:
    114
    truth hurts eh?
     
  3. SaxonPig

    SaxonPig Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2006
    Messages:
    4,787
    This from the same people who blamed Rush Limbaugh for OKC bombing. They want to throw darts at others...
     
  4. Jeff82

    Jeff82 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2004
    Messages:
    190
    Location:
    East Coast
    This gov't is out of control.
     
  5. opr1945

    opr1945 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2009
    Messages:
    92
    Location:
    South of the Zoo, Michigan
    In the law there is a concept called Sovereign Immunity, i.e. the King can do no wrong.

    Since the King is the source of all law, anything the King does must be legal.

    While not officially a King some of our politicians have grasped the concept.
     
  6. jiminhobesound

    jiminhobesound Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2011
    Messages:
    261
    Holder fires back

    How much can the 42 percent of americans that pay taxes, yes forty two percent, take from the government? The Soverign example is a good one. I used to blame the liberals. We voted to turn out congress into a conservative, rational group that would implement real changes. No such luck so far as far as I can determine. How do we turn the tide? How do we extend the concept of the second amendment preserving our constitutional rights to the rest of our constitution?
     
  7. heron

    heron Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2007
    Messages:
    1,062
    Location:
    NE Ohio
    I'd suggest we begin by outlawing paid lobbyists.
     
  8. cambeul41

    cambeul41 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2005
    Messages:
    1,186
    Location:
    Southeast Michigan
    Including those representing the RKBA groups?
     
  9. Neverwinter

    Neverwinter Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2008
    Messages:
    1,049
    "When the President does it, that means it is not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon

    There are a great deal of executive actions which involved unilateral interpretation of the Constitution to deal with crises. Read more of the history in John Yoo's book Crisis and Command. This isn't a problem which has only surfaced in the two most recent administrations.

    What you've put in there is neither conservative nor rational. However, the evidence of this is beyond the scope of the forum.
     
    Last edited: May 6, 2011
  10. Usmc-1

    Usmc-1 Member.

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2011
    Messages:
    240
    Location:
    Free Oklahoma Territory
    out lawing paid lobbyists wouldnt work , theres always ways around the legal terms to get things accomplished , not to mention of course the NRA would be on that list , if you think for one minute the NRAs lobbyist "arent giving away" vacations and other such stuff , think again , lobbyist are paid well because they know how to institute graft on politicians without getting caught , our NRA lobbyists are professionals , dumping lobbyist would hurt Gun owners
     
  11. jerkface11

    jerkface11 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2005
    Messages:
    5,498
    Location:
    Arkansas
    Amend the constitution so that all federal laws sunset after 10 years. Keeping existing laws in force would keep congress too occupied to screw with anything else.
     
  12. TexasBill

    TexasBill Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2009
    Messages:
    1,126
    Location:
    Texas Gulf Coast
    Better idea: Amend the Constitution so that lawmakers sunset after 10 years.
     
  13. wally

    wally Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2004
    Messages:
    12,365
    Location:
    Houston, Tx
    IMHO the only reform needed would be to change election laws so candidates can only accept contributions from people actually eligible to vote for them. That would make President the only national campaign and limit the scope of a lobbyist's financial reach.

    Some might argue that then only the "rich" could run for office, but so what? They would be putting their own money at risk for what they believe in. Do you really want unsuccessful people (like Obama -- never had a real job) trying to run the Government?
     
  14. hso

    hso Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    47,966
    Location:
    0 hrs east of TN
    Yes, it is offensive, and especially so because it is true. It is offensive that the US gvt. would have contributed to the violence. It is offensive that the BATFE would have contributed to the death of US citizens and US law enforcement personnel. It is offensive that Eric Holder would head an organization that lies about the what and where of the guns used in the southern drug violence while funneling guns to contribute to that violence and then lie about their role in contributing to the death of Americans and American officers.

    Yes, it IS offensive.
     
  15. TexasBill

    TexasBill Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2009
    Messages:
    1,126
    Location:
    Texas Gulf Coast
    Quick reality check here: 1. Obama's held several "real jobs" and has made quite a bit of money from his books. He is actually a multi-millionaire. His income in 2009 was $5.5 million. 2. Oddly enough, one of the most successful strategies of Obama's 2008 Presidential campaign was a record number small donations from individuals, i.e., the people who voted for him.

    That being said, Holder sounds like one more Attorney General who needs to be dumped (or maybe indicted). The buck may stop with the President, but it sure as heck made a stop at Holder's desk on the way.
     
  16. wally

    wally Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2004
    Messages:
    12,365
    Location:
    Houston, Tx
    Fer instance?

    The real question is did the publishers make any money from his books? Having his Liberal media backers give him a $1M or whatever advance for a book is way different that being a successful author. I've several friends who've written good books but have had zero success at getting them published.

    His two books I'm aware of are political claptrack. If average people actually buy them and believe in him I'm afraid we are doomed :(
     
  17. TexasBill

    TexasBill Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2009
    Messages:
    1,126
    Location:
    Texas Gulf Coast
    He worked for community groups and taught at the University of Chicago Law School for 12 years. He also was an associate at the law firm of Davis, Miner, Barnhill & Galland.

    He was the first black president of the Harvard Law Review and graduated with highest honors with a Juris Doctor degree. He was asked to write a book that became Dreams from My Father. It received high praise from the critics and has gone through seven printings. Obama won a Grammy for the auto book version as well as a half-million-dollar advance on a version for youthful readers.

    His second book, The Audacity of Hope, was published in 2006 and went to No. 1 on the New York Times and Amazon best-seller lists.

    I'm guessing the publisher made his money back.

    Getting a book published is tough; even if it's a good book. Tell your friends to keep trying. Also tell them to see if they can get a meeting with an agent.

    Your opinion and you're welcome to it. I could give you a list of books I consider political claptrap, not to mention lousy writing, but that have sold well.

    And this really isn't on topic and, frankly, isn't High Road. The topic is Attorney General Holder whom I think most of us agree is not a shining example of the breed nor is he one of Obama's better cabinet picks.

    My concern is that Holder really does have a lot of work that needs to be done (Wall Street, Medicare and welfare fraud and immigration, just to name a few) but I keep getting the impression that he has his own agenda that diverts far too much of his attention.
     
  18. merlinfire

    merlinfire Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2010
    Messages:
    793
    Guys, debating the merits of the president's book is not really what this threat is about.


    I would like to see Holder address the whistleblowers claims directly. If he thinks they're lying, take it to court. The court will wring the truth out of it.
     
  19. NMGonzo

    NMGonzo Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2009
    Messages:
    2,691
    Location:
    Albuquerque & Santa Fe
    This is how the gun forums read lately.

    [innocent bystander poster] "I shot a butterfly in mid air today!!!"

    [the frothing crowd] "Obama sucks"

    If Holder is guilty of a crime; should do time.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page