Aguila=CCI rimfire quality?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Pyro

Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2010
Messages
1,086
Location
Earth
I've shot thousands of CCI rimfire bullets (premium and Blazer) and IMO they are the highest quality rimfire bullet out there. Outstandingly reliable rimfire priming, "clean", and a decent bullet crimp to boot (even bulk Blazer bullets don't twist like Remington/Winchester/Federal bulk ammo).
I'm looking to get some Aguila rimfire since I've been told their quality can be compared to CCI. Is this true? I'd like to know that I'm not buying a brick of Remy Thunderbolts disguised under a different brand name. I'm looking at their premium ammo (Super-Maximum, SSS, and Interceptor).
 
I've never had any problems with Aguila SSS, Colibri or Super Colibri. I haven't tried any of their other offerings.
 
The Hypermaximum is fun to shoot in a .22 pistol but probably the most inaccurate I have ever shot in a rifle.
 
I prefer Aguila to most of what is on the market their rifle match for me performs as good as Wolf match, there standard velocity is nearly as accurate as there rifle match, no problems in my 10/22's nor my bolt action. I started to use the Aguila brand when I tried some shorts and found them quite and accurate.
 
For the most part, I have found Aguila rimfire to be decent shooting and over the chronograph, holding close to factory ballistics except for the Supermaximum which is rated at 1750fps, but over my chronograph ran in the low to mid 1500's fps.

I also noticed the smell of their burnt powder was quite pungent compared to other brands.
I have heard that Remington has a vested interest in Aguila.


NCsmitty
 
I always preferred PMC to anything else. Since Aguila supposedly took it over I have used it with excellent results.

In my guns nothing except Ely Tenex shoots on average any better.

Everything I shoot needs to satisfy my definition for accuracy and the Aguila loads, especially the non plated do.
 
Aguila shoots well from both of my match chambered 10/22's, my modified Bentz chambered 10/22 prefers CCI. None of them shoot really well with bulk of any kind.
 
I have heard that Remington has a vested interest in Aguila.

I haven't confirmed this, but I've heard sort of the opposite. From what I was told, Remington used to have one of their ammunition factories down in Mexico. Eventually they decided to shut it down, and when they sold the factory (including all the tooling and such used there) another company bought it and founded Aguila.

In that respect some their building and some portion of their equipment would be former Remington equipment. Again though, not sure on the validity of this.

In any event I've had nothing but good experiences with Aguila ammo.
 
I was under the impression that Aguila had purchased Eley tooling and machinery. Their ammunition sure smells like Eley when you fire it.
Aguila match rifle ammo is of decent quality. It shoots as well as most other mid range standard velocity ammo. It is not as good as Eley black box or Tenex, nor as good as SK std+ or match. But it is good practice ammo and of significantly better quality than the bulk packed stuff at WalMart. It functions in my 10-22, R55 semi autos properly. The match rifle will not function in my Smith m41 or in my High Standard semi auto pistol, but the pistol match will.

Roger
 
Thanks everyone. My M597 will eat anything I put in it now that it's been broken in a couple thousand rounds so I might try and see of the SSS will cycle it (no doubt will keyhole but it's for fun).
 
Colibri and Super Colibri is GTG.

I am almost through a brick of the standard velocity Match. Accuracy is almost as good as Federal, I seem to get more flyers. It's a little dirtier too.
 
Aguila SSS and accuracy

My company has been doing a lot of work on the Aguila SSS ammunition for a barrel project over the last year and a half.

The current production SSS (as of Q2 2010) and later is (heartbreakingly) almost but not quite match ammo.

The new production ammo is Eley primed, and has a moderatly lubricated bullet. If you can't raise a scraping of lube with your thumbnail, it's the older ammunition that will not shot for #!@$@#$.

The next problem is that somewhere between 3-9% of the rounds have insufficient powder in them. If you use your electronic scale, and toss all the ammo that is > 1.5 grains lower than the average, you'll virtually eliminate the flyers that ruin groups. The rounds that are heavier than the average don't seem to suffer significant issues.

Let me tell you about the joy of prying open 100's of the SSS rounds to weigh the bullets, powder, and brass. Not fun after the first 20 or so. The bullets seem to have only a high side distribution, while the powder is near a Gaussian with a long low weight tail. The brass weight is near a normal distribution.

Those suffering from OCD can narrow that window to +-0.2 grains, and get near match quality ammunition.

The light weight rounds will often shoot 300+ fps slower than the average, of about 900 fps.

These light weight rounds will open up your 25 yard groups from the 0.200's to 2+ inches. That sucks. ;)

We've developed a barrel with an Optimal Twist of 1:11.25 that will stabilize the SSS, while not over spinning standard 40 grain ammo. If you are interested in the development process for the drop in barrels for 10/22 check out http://sci-tac.com/testing.html
 
Longer range groups

We don't shoot at 100 yards, because we don't have an indoor range close enough for testing on a regular basis.

We have had only once customer that had a decent set up that has reported groups so far:

20 power scope,
match trigger group (unknown pull weight),
Match bolt (MOA)
a factory wood stock he bedded himself,
on sandbags,
in an indoor range
With a suppressor & bolt lock

five 5 shot group average was 0.45" using weight sorted SSS. I've not gotten a response from the guy after asking for more info in equipment and pix.

We will be doing our own more extensive testing to see if we can identify consistent hummer barrels that will shoot SSS into the zeros all the time. Those barrels will be sold at a significant premium. ;)

Most of the other reports have been with 12x-16x scopes and factory trigger groups, bolted together guns, no special bedding, etc. The reports are usually at or under 3/4" at 100y with weight sorted ammo. I suspect that's because those with worse groups due to bad technique or ??? simply don't bother to report. Most guys can't shoot better than 1" off of bags in any case, especially if there is any kind of wind.

Those that don't weight sort ammo get 1"+ groups with flyers that open things up to shotgun size patterns at 100 yards. (8"+ with the flyers)

Our own testing with a MOA screw in barreled action, short Bentz chamber, clamped into a machine rest, match trigger, Outback Suppressor on the muzzle, and 40 x scope at *** _ 25 yards _ *** show that ~~1/2 of the barrels will give 5x5 averages of 0.060-0.090 or less, with the occasional horrible flyers. We think a bolt lock will cure those flyers. Testing of that will be happening when ever we get a warm spell, as it's @#$@!#$! cold in the indoor range.

The other half of the barrels usually shoot into the 0.1's, but we don't want to piss people off by claiming that, then have them slap a barrel into a wal-mart gun and not achieve our results.

Like the guy that didn't weight sort, used a 9x tasco scope on a Wal Mart gun, then got pissed because his groups were ~1-1/4" at 100 yards in breezy conditions. I told him I think those groups were a statistical freak event, and he should never expect to do that good with that set up in the future. :banghead:
 
I'm a huge fan of the Aguila subsonic ammo...it shoots just as good as CCI subsonics with my suppressor.
 
I like their Super Colibri rounds, and their centerfire ammo. Haven't had a chance to use standard velocity stuff, though.

So basically my opinion here is useless. lol
 
"I'm a huge fan of the Aguila subsonic ammo...it shoots just as good as CCI subsonics with my suppressor."

Same here except for the suppressor part. Great accurate pest control ammo in my rifles.
 
I use Aguila subsonic LRN and CCI standard velocity exclusively. I consider them equivalent in quality, and both shoot well from my rifles.
 
I personally used to buy CCI .22lr ammo exclusively. That was because it cycled all of my semi-autos just great. Now after trying Aguila I'm sold. I used to love stingers but switched to Super maximum Hypervelocity for my 10/22, which buy the way are regular .22lr lenghth not longer like the stingers. The stinger can't even come close to the velocity they come with. As far as accuracy they are minute of skunk at 50 yards and it has never taken more than one shot to stop any varmint for that matter. They are also Eley primed and I have yet for one not to go bang. Now it is Aguila SMHV all the way, at least the hollow point flavor, it is my favorite!

Almost forgot, I can get a box for $1 to $1.60 cheaper than stingers,I just don't get a fancy plastic box. That's something I can live with!
 
Last edited:
SSS with optimal twist, and Varmits

I was asked why bother with an 'optimal twist' if the 1:9 twist that is standard for fast twist 22LR's works ok.

o A less over stabilized twist rate will let the very long SSS bullet achieve it's potential as a pest control round. Think coyotes, not ground squirrels. An over spun SSS will drill both sides of the coyotes. Ranchers around here that use it for discrete coyote control, and want to keep the pelts. An over spun bullet will drill a hole, a properly spun bullet with make an entrance hole on a body shot, and no exit hole. ( No, I've not gotten any reports on results on coyotes yet). Time will tell if the average body shot gives enough resistance to eliminate or reduce the exit holes. Ranchers do most of their coyote thinning in late winter and spring.

o Even in ultra match fast twist barrels, you'll see a degrading of accuracy in the 1:9 twist over the 1:16 twist for standard velocity 38 or 40 grain match ammo. The hope is that the optimal twist (1:11.25) will allow the lighter weight bullets to perform up to their match potential. All indications are that this works, though further testing will be done to confirm the theory as weather permits.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top