Just a thought.
Firearms are containment devices. All of the energy in the projectile is provided by the chemical reactions that take place inside the cartridge. The firearm itself only has to activate the primer and contain the resultant explosion/reaction. It provides none of the propulsion.
Airguns are propulsion devices. All of the energy in the projectile is stored within the airgun itself. Either in the form of compressed air or a compressed spring. In many cases, the airgun also must incorporate a charging mechanism that allows the user to compress the air or the spring in a reasonably easy fashion.
In my experience airgun mechanisms are a good deal more complicated and involved to work on than firearms are. That makes a lot of sense when you consider the above.
Therefore, it is unreasonable to expect a high quality, relatively powerful airgun to be inexpensive. It has to do MORE than a firearm does.
Firearms are containment devices. All of the energy in the projectile is provided by the chemical reactions that take place inside the cartridge. The firearm itself only has to activate the primer and contain the resultant explosion/reaction. It provides none of the propulsion.
Airguns are propulsion devices. All of the energy in the projectile is stored within the airgun itself. Either in the form of compressed air or a compressed spring. In many cases, the airgun also must incorporate a charging mechanism that allows the user to compress the air or the spring in a reasonably easy fashion.
In my experience airgun mechanisms are a good deal more complicated and involved to work on than firearms are. That makes a lot of sense when you consider the above.
Therefore, it is unreasonable to expect a high quality, relatively powerful airgun to be inexpensive. It has to do MORE than a firearm does.