(AK) Thief shoots himself with stolen gun

Status
Not open for further replies.

Drizzt

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
2,647
Location
Moscow on the Colorado, TX
Thief shoots himself with stolen gun
TAKEN FROM PARKED CAR: He was handling the loaded weapon.

By JAMES HALPIN
[email protected]

Published: September 22, 2007
Last Modified: September 22, 2007 at 01:52 AM

A man who stole a gun from a parked car shot himself in the leg only moments later as he fiddled with the weapon, Anchorage police said Friday.

The man, who has not yet been charged with a crime, was roaming among parked vehicles in an East Anchorage neighborhood, stealing valuables, when he came up with the handgun, according to police. He was accompanied in his exploits that day, Sept. 7, by an unnamed woman who was driving a red Audi sedan, Anchorage Police Department spokesman Lt. Paul Honeman said.

The man began "manipulating" the weapon, a Glock, and it went off, striking him in the left leg, Honeman said.

"It's like the Darwin Awards," Honeman said.

The woman helped the man get to a nearby residence, where they called for medical help.

Officers went to the 3500 block of East 19th Avenue about 7 a.m., Honeman said. They found him with a wound that Honeman described as a "through and through." The man was treated at a hospital and released, Honeman said.

The woman had already left in her Audi but was later found in a mobile home park on the 3300 block of Boniface Parkway. Officers recovered the car and the Glock there, Honeman said.

No charges have been filed because, in part, the victim hasn't been identified at this point, Honeman said.

"We don't know where he got the gun or where he shot himself," Honeman said. "One of the issues is that we're looking for a victim of the crime."

The weapon is described only as a Glock automatic pistol, and its caliber is not being released to help police in identifying the rightful owner, who may not know the gun has been stolen, Honeman said.

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms is also tracing the handgun, Honeman said, but that could take up to six weeks to complete. Even then, it will only tell police who first bought it, not necessarily who its current owner is, he said.

Once an owner is located, the wounded man could face charges of felony theft of a firearm, Honeman said.

The weapon's owner will not likely face any criminal penalties, Honeman said, because it is not a crime to store a loaded gun in a car.

"It's just stupid," he said.

More than 1 million firearms are stolen nationwide each year, Honeman said. Of those, more than half are handguns. In Anchorage, one in four handgun thefts take place in unoccupied, parked vehicles. Many of them are left unlocked, he said.

"It's just a staggering amount. There's too many instances and it's too often," Honeman said. "You're more likely in this city to be a victim of property crime than any other crime."

http://www.adn.com/news/alaska/crime/story/9322233p-9237368c.html
 
"Glock automatic pistol"???

Don't they mean semi-automatic?
It's both an automatic and a semi-automatic. It is an automatic since it doesn't need to be manually cycled. It is semi-automatic since it has a disconnector that allows only one shot when the trigger is squeezed.

Since when did automatic need to mean fully automatic? It merely means that the action doesn't normally require input from the user to function. Much like an automatic transmission is automatic.

My favorite Darwin's Award story is the mugger that tried to shoot his victim with the revolver he held. It failed to fire so he looked down the barrel and fired again. It's hard to beat that one.
 
You forgot the "assault" part. It's the Glock Fully-Automatic Assault Revolver.
 
Well I think the cop deserves the Darwin award. He goes on leaving a gun in a locked car is stupid and all the guns that get ripped off out of vehicles...but they get the perp dead to rights and let him go and no charges then its oh the owner of the gun will probably not get charged...makes you wonder why people pay taxes at times.
 
One million guns stolen each year nationwide? I recently read the number was less than 200,000 each year.:confused:. It makes you wonder how anyone in this country could still own a gun. By those statistics, shouldn't every gun in this country be stolen a year or two after it's purchased?
 
"The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms is also tracing the handgun, Honeman said, but that could take up to six weeks to complete."

??????????????????????????????????????????????????

BATF is really on the ball, hunh?
 
Don't laugh yet. The guy may sue the gun owner for leaving a loaded gun in an unattended vehicle. If somebody can successfully sue MacDonald's after having spilt their coffee on themselves...he could win.

In today's America...a burglar breaks into your home...your dog bites him...burglar sues and takes your house.
 
Don't laugh yet. The guy may sue the gun owner for leaving a loaded gun in an unattended vehicle. If somebody can successfully sue MacDonald's after having spilt their coffee on themselves...he could win.

In today's America...a burglar breaks into your home...your dog bites him...burglar sues and takes your house.

I used to think the same thing about the Macdonald's coffee law suit until I actually had to study it in a law class. There are federal regulation regarding how coffee can be heated. This coffee was heated way above those regulation. It was determined that the 190-200 degree coffee the lady was served was hot enough to produce 3rd degree burns in 3 second. At about 180 degrees it takes about 12 to 15 seconds to get 3rd degree burns and at 160 degrees, the max temp the cofee should have been served at, it takes 20 seconds to get 3rd degree burns.

In this incident, when the coffee spilled on an 80 year old lady's lap, giving her severe 3rd degree burns that required hospitalization and numerous skin graphs. It is my understanding that she had never filed a past law suit in her life and she first contacted Macdonalds to request compensation for here actual injuries. When Macdonald would only offer her $800, she filed her law suit requesting just enough to cover her medical bills. In fact, Macdonald's even turned down numerous settlements offers, including a $250,000 offer highly recommended by an impartial judge during mediation.

The jury in the case awarded the woman $160,000 for actual (compensatory) damaged and then $2.7 million dollars in punitive damages because documents showed that in the past decade McDonald's had received at least 700 reports of coffee burns ranging from mild to third degree, and had settled claims arising from scalding injuries for more than $500,000. Following the trial, the judge reduced the punitive damages to just under $500,000.

(Sorry to hijack the thread, I just thought others might have a misunderstanding of this case as I did)

However, the cases that upset me are the ones where a burglar breaks into a home, and while inside trips and falls then sues the home owners. This is simply ridiculous.
 
Darwin Award?

"Maybe this is today's Darwin Award winner?"

As has already been pointed out, the Darwin Award requires that the recipient eliminate himself from the gene pool.

I recall a similar incident, which did qualify for that award, about ten years ago, in Reno NV.

Two illegal aliens decided to play Russian roulette with a .357 Magnum revolver that had been stolen out of an automobile. One fired a bullet through his own head, which went on to strike and kill his partner as well.
 
The Roolz

Two illegal aliens decided to play Russian roulette with a .357 Magnum revolver that had been stolen out of an automobile. One fired a bullet through his own head, which went on to strike and kill his partner as well.
Worth noting that the only rule violated in this is rule #4.

Think about it.
 
Don't laugh yet. The guy may sue the gun owner for leaving a loaded gun in an unattended vehicle. If somebody can successfully sue MacDonald's after having spilt their coffee on themselves...he could win.

If someone did bring such a suit here, they'd get a good laugh from the jury before getting nailed with monumental Rule 68 fees. Alaska is loser-pays.

Since when did automatic need to mean fully automatic? It merely means that the action doesn't normally require input from the user to function. Much like an automatic transmission is automatic.

I believe "Glock Automatic Pistol" is an official designation for the firearm. It doesn't mean fully automatic. Far be it from from me to defend the ADN, but if they say the pistol was identified as a GAP, it probably was.
 
If someone did bring such a suit here, they'd get a good laugh from the jury before getting nailed with monumental Rule 68 fees. Alaska is loser-pays.

Go Aaska! Set the precedent for the lower 48!

Zen...I know about that part of the story...but it's still a travesty. We assume that coffee is hot when it's steaming and we take the necessary precautions to prevent burning ourselves. If we don't do so...the culpability is ours. This notion that it's always the other guy's fault closely parallels the recent attempts to make the gun manufacturer responsible for producing a device that has the potential to hurt somebody...including ourselves...if we get careless with it.

Hot coffee can burn us. Guns can hurt us. We take pains to insure that doesn't happen, but in today's world...people can get stupid and make somebody else pay through the nose for their own ineptitude.

Sorry. That's just wrong...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top