Alaska state CCW law will be enforced in Anchorage!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Chugach

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
232
Location
Anchorage, Alaska
GOOD NEWS! :D

Significance:
The municipality of Anchorage will follow Alaska state law instead of enforcing more restrictive municipal CCW ordinance!

This is especially noteworthy since the newly elected mayor is a Democrat!

Background:
This is an editorial from The Voice of the Times, a conservative opinion/editorial page within the far more liberal Anchorage Daily News. TVotT is the sole remnant of the conservative Anchorage Times which was eliminated in competition against the ADN (a cog in the McClatchy publishing empire).

Voice of the Times (within the Anchorage Daily News)
(Published: September 26, 2003)
MAYOR MAKES WISE CHOICE ON . . .Gun law

MAYOR MARK BEGICH made the right decision when he opted to have the city enforce the new state law on carrying concealed weapons rather than the more stringent Anchorage ordinance.

A long overdue state statute that went into effect this month allows law-abiding Alaskans to carry defensive weapons, not just handguns, concealed without a permit.

While the new law allows Alaskans to finally exercise their Second Amendment rights without asking the state for permission, the highly successful concealed weapons permit system - which requires classroom training and shooting qualification - will remain in effect so that permit holders can avail themselves of reciprocity offered by an increasing number of states.

But when the new law took effect there was a fly in the ointment causing some confusion. Anchorage for some years has had an ordinance on the books requiring anybody carrying a concealed weapon to have the state permit. A legal opinion requested by Assemblyman Dick Traini and issued by the municipal attorney's office concluded the city could, indeed, enforce its ordinance, making the concealed carry of a weapon without a state-issued permit illegal.

The question was: Which standard would be used in Anchorage? After talking to Traini and others, the mayor did the right thing. Begich chief of staff David Ramseur said the mayor is opting to enforce the state law, but hopes that those who carry without a permit will educate themselves first.

All of this is better than good news for advocates of Second Amendment rights. But Begich is correct in urging those who carry concealed without a state permit to find a way to learn the ins and outs of self-defense laws, in which locations weapons are banned, gun safety and myriad other pieces of information that go along with this important right. And there is much to learn. Those carrying a concealed weapon, for instance, must immediately tell police officers who approach them in an official capacity that they are armed.

It is just common sense that a person who chooses to carry a weapon do so in a responsible manner. To do otherwise is to play into the hands of those who oppose the exercise of Second Amendment rights.

Perhaps the National Rifle Association or the Anchorage police or state troopers could set up a course for a nominal fee to teach the basics of concealed carry and the state law so that those who do not seek a state permit can at least get the basic education required of permit holders.

The state law is a giant step toward recognizing a basic constitutional right, and Begich's decision not to thwart it in Anchorage is good news.
 
Wow!

A city, within the state, actually bowing to state law. Who'da thunk it?

Doesn't necessarily fly in Colorado though.

We've got that nasty "home rule" thing that allows them to think they can do without state laws .....
no matter a state constitution (void where prohibited).

ya right, but nevertheless, the suits still file the suits.

Funky enough, & drives The Machine.
 
This is a shocker....or at least in conventional thinking. Democrats taking a stand for freedom in spite of the national party? The original bill was submitted by Eric Croft D- Anchorage to a republican controlled legislature. Now we find the newly elected mayor who is also a Democrat not only suppo0rting the state law, but mandating his government to enforce it. *** is going on here?:scrutiny:
I'm left wondering one of the republicans won the election, if George Wurtch-R (incumbent) or Rick Mystrom (R challenger) would have come up with the same decision. :confused:
 
Sweetness. Alaska is a great state, a shining example for the rest of the country. I'm sure the blissninnies will be screaming about blood flowing in the streets.

Now if we can just get them to dig up all that natural gas in Prudhoe Bay . . .
 
There are plenty of anti 2nd amendment Republicans as well as pro-2nd amendment Democrats. I don't judge candidates on the gun issue by party.

Who would you rather see in Congress, John Breaux (D-LA, 26% voted with the Bradys) or Richard Lugar (R-IN, 52% voted with the Bradys)?
 
This is a shocker....or at least in conventional thinking. Democrats taking a stand for freedom in spite of the national party?

It WAS a shocker! I have never voted a single-party line...always tried to evaluate the individual politician. To have Democrats Croft and Begich "lead the way" on this RKBA issue gives me real hope that some Democrats are willing to buck the national trend. Admittedly, taking that stance in Alaska is very easy compared to the more urbanized and populous states.

AND, I'll feel a heck of a lot more comfortable when Begich's enforcement policy gets converted into municipal law as opposed to just policy.

AND, doesn't mean I trust the Democratic party as a whole...in fact, far from it.

You've gotta admire what's been accomplished here though: the second state to trust its citizens with reasonable carry laws.
 
A legal opinion requested by Assemblyman Dick Traini and issued by the municipal attorney's office concluded the city could, indeed, enforce its ordinance, making the concealed carry of a weapon without a state-issued permit illegal.

It's usually not very difficult to find an assault lawyer who'll vouch for the rightness of anything, no matter how stupid, preposterous, irrational, illegal, or ludicrous—assuming you've got enough money, of course.

Assault lawyers are more expensive than street hookers, but their guiding principles are the same.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top