Another great question is what will the price settle at when this is all over? It’s like gasoline.. Every time it makes big big jumps quick, it never goes back to true supply v demand pricing. 22lr was 2-3 cents before the 1st shortage.
So the question becomes will the 9MM and 223 become financial unsuitable if prices do not return to pre panic prices?
I know its tin foil hat stuff, maybe the game is now to price the public out of the owning of arms considered "unsuitable" for civilian ownership. After all without the ammo you own a stick or club.
It’s not nearly as “tin foil” as probably we think it is!
Australia. Look at what happened there. Stamps, taxes, permits..... money$$$.
Cost.... is a big deal.... the biggest deal, and clearly California is using taxes and rising costs as a practical tactic to not only price people out of shooting sports, but the effects are far more cascading and far reaching.
To quote Edward the Longshanks in Braveheart, “The trouble with Scotland is that it’s full of Scots”!
Many people have left California because they are tired of their rights being taken, if not their aching wallets, just trying to participate at all!
Most dedicated people will try and afford their passions somehow, but it should be said that, perhaps even the vast majority of people who own a-gun..... are not that dedicated, or expanding their firearms interests! Inside the bubble of like thinkers, it’s easy to lose sight of that simple but powerful reality. And a small group of dedicated folks will not sustain 2A, because when do a small % of people ever matter nationally, even when (especially when) they have the right idea?
So yes, I believe that antis are watching and taking notes on it all. Which is why I think commerce laws might help this situation if applied. The pricing problem, because it’s guns.... is largely ignored by the general public. But if it were say..... food, or phones suddenly jumping 3,4,5X in price, or beer....then yes you’d absolutely see protections laws applied, just like with the guys gouging PPE.
It illustrates that firearms are not considered “essential”..”protected”, like these other items, but a “privilege” to own, by the government, and society at large! Even though 2A guarantees it.