An anti converted? Perhaps...

Status
Not open for further replies.

RNB65

Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2006
Messages
4,056
Location
Richmond, VA
http://www.newsobserver.com/sports/story/634471.html

What is it about guns? Columnist finds out

Ruth Sheehan, Staff Writer

I had written about guns before.

I'd written about how they've been used, mostly illegally, by people under restraining orders for harming their wives, by people diagnosed with mental illness, by lowlife kids looking for a thrill (and killing a sheriff's deputy in the process).

But until I showed up at the Wake County Firearms Education and Training Center recently, I had never seen a gun up close.

I had never touched one.

I had never fired one.

And I sure as heck had never nailed a paper plate dead center with a 9mm Smith & Wesson. (More on that later.)

Everything I knew about guns I'd learned from Angie Dickinson and the group North Carolinians Against Gun Violence.

Maybe that's why some of the guys out at the public firing range looked less than thrilled when I walked in for my lesson.

Luckily, National Rifle Association instructor and sharpshooter Eric Shuford was willing to give me a chance.

I was set up with Shuford by my colleague, N&O outdoors editor Mike Zlotnicki, who'd been urging me to visit the range for months.

The conversation got started when I wrote about a local mother's push to get parents to ask whether there are guns in the homes their kids are visiting.

The column stirred quite a response in the gun-owning world.

Several shooters had invited me out with them, but the offers evaporated when I said yes.

Zlotnicki, who probably heard as much about that column as I did, decided to take matters into his own hands.

Or maybe he just has a perverse sense of humor.

Either way, I went through the requisite gun safety course one night in June.

And on the night before Independence Day, I drove out to Wake's very impressive range outside Apex.

I will admit to chewing one of my nails down to the quick on the way.

But the first and most enduring thing you learn about Wake's public range is that safety comes before all else.

Shuford had brought out several of his smaller guns for me to try.

We did a dry run in a classroom first, with an empty chamber, so I could learn how to line up the sights. Shuford determined I was right-eye dominant (my left eye was in a permanent squint while sighting). He showed me how to hold the gun with two hands, thumbs off to the left, finger never approaching the trigger until ready to shoot. He told me to hold my breath and pull.

Click.

Then, donning ear and eye protection, we headed out to the range.

Stereotype-busting, this was not.

There were a lot of burly guys shooting very large guns.

And I now understand why people say gunfire can be mistaken for firecrackers. In this case, nearby firecrackers.

I jumped at every noise.

Shuford ushered me to a more quiet section of the range and brought out a Smith & Wesson .22 revolver and a .22 Ruger autoloader.

I tried both, sitting down and standing up.

And though the firing underscored my fear of firearms, I also found it empowering.

The target was only five yards away, but it was thrilling to see the clusters of bullet holes appear on paper plates stapled to the cardboard.

After I'd gotten reasonably comfortable, Shuford trotted out a couple more guns. The first, a Sterling .22, showed how some of the flashy guns used on TV are inaccurate even at close range.

Shuford said that most folks, including law enforcement officers, don't spend enough time at the range to fire well anyway.

"Criminals don't worry me too much," he said.

No, I'll bet they don't.

Then Shuford helped me load a hollow-point bullet into a sleek 9mm, the kind favored by cops.

This thing felt like a serious weapon. This thing had a little bit more kickback.

Nervously, I lined up the sights and pulled the trigger.

When I managed to pry my eyes open, I discovered I had bored a bull's-eye in the paper plate.

(Angie Dickinson, kiss my foot.)

It was beginner's luck, but I think Shuford was right proud of me.

He offered for me to keep going. But after a couple of hours with Ruger and S&W, I was feeling the tension, and the weight of the guns, in my arms and shoulders.

We packed the weapons carefully and headed out to the car, chatting amiably about my education. Shooting is like any other sport, Shuford told me.

"Next time," Shuford said, "you should bring your sons."

That brought me up short.

My sons.

I know the boys would love to visit the range. They've tried riflery at camp. No doubt they'd love to try this as well.

The range's emphasis on safety would be good for young men who have informed me they were born with the ability to make AK-47 sounds.

Still, I fear fueling a fascination with firearms in the boys.

I can't shake the image of one of them at a friend's house, finding a gun and "showing" his friends how to use it.

Still, I might be persuaded to go back out to the range myself. Who knows? I may end up with a concealed-carry permit.

Whatever happens, one thing is sure: I'll be hanging my 9mm paper plate here at my desk.

I wish I'd had it during the Duke lacrosse debacle.

I like the idea that bloggers -- and editors -- don't know for sure whether I might be packing heat.

I think I'll keep it that way.
 
Interesting. But she gets it backwards: bringing her boys to the range will make them less likely to fool with a gun they find in some friend's house.
 
can't shake the image of one of them at a friend's house, finding a gun and "showing" his friends how to use it.

I'm more afraid of the ignorant person who finds it and says "Whoa this is cool" while pointing the "unloaded" gun at someone and firing....

All my kids will be learning about firearms and more importantly - firearms safety.
 
Everything I knew about guns I'd learned from Angie Dickinson and the group North Carolinians Against Gun Violence.
Very seldom will people admit to having such a limited knowledge base and then try to change it. Way to go for her.
 
Soybomb said:
Very seldom will people admit to having such a limited knowledge base and then try to change it. Way to go for her.
+1

This is a much better method to getting people over from the dark side than screaming at them for calling a magazine a 'clip', or nearly biting someone's head off for asking why you need "cop-killer hollow points". I am guilty of both, but I have also taken many people to the range, and purchased CCW permits for 2 of my friends who had never shot a gun before I took them out.

It's amazing how people can judge so easily without knowing the first thing about squat.
 
It's very cool to read about this on THR - I was at the range that night!

The range is a very nice county facility, and it's administered by a pretty old and very well respected local gun club. The range officers are great - the ones I have talked to are relaxed and friendly, but absolutely hardcore about what is permitted and not permitted on the range. They are very safety conscious.

I have taken both of my kids and several nieces and nephews there, and I tell them they have to sit through the orientation class before they can shoot. That's not strictly true, but I really want them to get the safety lecture from a non-parent.

That night, Eric was showing a very nice looking blond lady around the range, and he stopped where I was shooting to show her a 45 LC round, for a comparison with the 22's she'd been shooting. He showed her my Blackhawk - I think he called it a "cowboy" gun. I offered to let her shoot it, but she declined. I wondered who she was, because she had photographer with her. I feel dumb that I did not recognize her, and I wasn't 100% sure that it was a photographer that was with her. I wondered if it could have been some very high tech scope or something like that.

I can't imagine a better introduction than being shown around that facility by Eric.

Mike
 
Awsome but I have seen this happen several times before. The lady in my pistol safety class ended up becoming totaly addicted after firing a 9mm. My mother also went from anti to enthusist though she prefers only pistol perhaps because she is a lefty. I am more of a long gun person.
 
damien said:
Angie Dickinson is an ANTI? Crap.

This is an anti moving to our side and you respond with an expletive? Good call. :)

I believe Ms. Sheehan was referring to an old TV show called "Police Woman", where Angie Dickinson played a character named "Sgt. Pepper Anderson". I think Ms. Sheehan was saying that all that she knew about guns - prior to her trip to the range - came from an old TV show and North Carolinians Against Gun Violence.

Mike
 
I responded to Ms. Sheehan's column and talked a little about her concerns about taking her sons to the range. She like what I had said, and asked me to shorten my response and submit it as a letter to the editor:

My letter:

Ms. Sheehan,

I was at the Wake County Range that night. Eric showed you the 45
"Long Colt" round I was shooting out of a Ruger Blackhawk revolver. I
think he referred to it as a "cowboy" gun. I offered to let you shoot
it, but you declined.

I can't imagine a better introduction to shooting than an evening at
the Wake County range with Eric showing you around. I share your
reaction that "safety comes before all else" at that range. That is
the main reason that I shoot there - it reminds me of an Izaak Walton
range I shot at as a kid several decades ago.

I do have one comment on "I fear fueling a fascination with firearms
in the boys."

As another parent - and not too much of a Gun Crank (I think) - I
decided that I'd rather have my son and my daughter (and one niece and
one nephew) learn about gun safety from Eric than leave then untutored
in that regard. I respect parents with different attitudes than my
own, but I think that Eric's class and a little range time is an
effective antidote to the Hollywood fascination with guns. Hollywood
guns are magic sabers that knock bad guy dead immediately, and never
hit anyone other than the intended targets.

My own hope is that once a child had taken Eric's class (or any of the
NRA safety classes), if they find a gun at a friend's house, they
might be more likely to point the gun in a safe direction, keep their
finger off of the trigger, etc. We can't know what they will do in
that circumstance - that's part of the challenge of parenting.

At least I do know that the children I have taken to the Wake County
range have heard the safety rules. More importantly, seen adult men
follow those very safety rules. From my perspective, it was important
that my nephew not only heard the range rules, but saw me open the
chamber of the weapon and step back when the range officer announced
"Range 3 is going cold!" It's is one thing - as a child - to have an
adult give you a rule. When you're a a child, adults are constantly
specifying rules. It's another thing to see that adult follow that
rule punctiliously.

At any rate, if you are out at the range again, and see a "burly"
(ouch) guy in a tee shirt that says "Tom Riddle is My Friend" shooting
a Ruger Blackhawk in 45 Long Colt, you (or you sons) are welcome to
shoot a few rounds. If you are of an age to remember Sgt. Pepper
Anderson, "Police Woman" (surely in re-runs), then you probably also
saw a Western or two. The Ruger Blackhawk is a very fun gun to shoot,
and functions more or less like those old gunslingers' weapons.

Sincerely,

Mike P. Wagner

Her response:

what a beautifully written, thoughtful discussion of the gun safety
issue regarding kids.
i wish you would shorten your letter and send a copy of it to our
letters to the editor. ([email protected])
even if you don't... i appreciate your note.
and i may take you up on the offer to give one of your guns a try.

I guess that I have my work cut out for me this weekend.

Mike
 
That is about as good as it gets for a response too. May not be perfect, but chalk it up as a win for reason.
 
Well done!

Tell her to bring the kids and write another article about how they no longer have the ignorance and fascination that other children who have never been taught might have.
 
My Letter to Ruth

I read the column and decided it was worth acknowledgement:
Dear Ruth,

I read with interest your recent column about your range trip with Eric Shuford.

As a still-learning recent addition to the shooting world myself, I must say, "jolly good show."

I've gone slowly, working my way up from a .22 calibre rifle to larger hardware, breaking one misconception after another along the way.

I've also spent some time teaching my two children to shoot.

I wish I had started earlier, both for myself and for them.

When Eric suggested to you that you should bring your boys I found myself in agreement.

Ignorance is of little value in achieving safety. We teach our kids about cars and driving in school. Why? Ignorance can kill them. We teach our kids about safe sex in school. Why? Ignorance can ruin their lives. At every turn in the educational process, we take care to inform and enlighten our kids because, in the end, ignorance is deadly stuff.

Except, in the last few decades, we've elected to NOT teach kids about guns and gun safety in school. Because ignorance is good and sacred and . . . say what?

Understanding does not come from indoctrination ("guns are bad!") but from information and education ("see, this is how that works ...") and from patient instruction.

My parents taught me to think for myself: obtain the data, observe and evaluate, then formulate a conclusion. They pointed out that uncritically accepting the pre-filtered opinions of others is to deny one's self most of the facts.

You're in the fact business. I'm greatly encouraged to see that you gather your own facts. Who knows? Maybe that could become a new trend in journalism.


Sincerely,

Arfin Greebly
After all, I try to encourage actual enlightenment over uninformed opinion.
 
You're in the fact business. I'm greatly encouraged to see that you gather your own facts. Who knows? Maybe that could become a new trend in journalism.

Do you really think that kind of comment helped your message? To be honest, I find that cheap shots at the career of the person to whom I am speaking impedes any real attempt at dialog.

My sense is that Ms. Sheehan speaks for a number of "soccer moms" in this area. The paper for which she writes has enormous influence through a wide swath of this state. If she were to become very pro-gun, that might have very nice (local) effect.

Pontificating is for Popes - it's unseemly for the rest of us!

Evil
 
Ruth's Reply To Me

In response to my message above, I received this today:
I've heard the same thing from others (regarding the wisdom of bringing my sons to the range), thanks for your note.
So, hey!

I got an answer!

And it was civil, and it implies that several of us said similar things to her.

And she seems to be at least a little receptive.

I'll take a win on that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top