SaintofKillers
Member
Nuke this poll please www.illinoisleader.com scroll down and to the right to see the poll, right now we are losing 50 to 47
another AWB poll
- Thread starter SaintofKillers
- Start date
- Status
ShootAndHunt
Member
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2003
- Messages
- 241
We are wininig now
Fox32 poll - chicago last night
The Fox news poll ,in Chicago (TV 32) ,concerning the AWB had the following results;
renew the ban 39%
Let it expire 61%
Not that the libs care but I thought it was interesting and evidently so did the newscasters who seemed slightly disappointed..
The Fox news poll ,in Chicago (TV 32) ,concerning the AWB had the following results;
renew the ban 39%
Let it expire 61%
Not that the libs care but I thought it was interesting and evidently so did the newscasters who seemed slightly disappointed..
Denny Hansen
Member
Hit.
Let it expire: 62.4
Renew it: 35.4
Denny
Let it expire: 62.4
Renew it: 35.4
Denny
John Hicks
Member
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2004
- Messages
- 143
I've seen a lot of polls, all of which have different results.
The trick is to see who conducted the poll. Online don't really count (although it is satisfying to nuke one just to make a point).
But what's really unnerving is polls that say 80% want renewal, but the poll was conducted by a disguised anti group (called the Sahara Foundation, or something neutral like that), and posts no data.
Unless it was conducted by Gallup, Zogby's, or a major news network and volunteers to post the data (which allows people to critique whether or not the questions were biased), I'd disregard it.
And even when the aforementioned "good" pollers post one, critique the results.
Sorry to vent, but I've seen a lot of links here and elsewhere to polls, most of which aren't worth the $.01 of storage space they occupy.
JH
The trick is to see who conducted the poll. Online don't really count (although it is satisfying to nuke one just to make a point).
But what's really unnerving is polls that say 80% want renewal, but the poll was conducted by a disguised anti group (called the Sahara Foundation, or something neutral like that), and posts no data.
Unless it was conducted by Gallup, Zogby's, or a major news network and volunteers to post the data (which allows people to critique whether or not the questions were biased), I'd disregard it.
And even when the aforementioned "good" pollers post one, critique the results.
Sorry to vent, but I've seen a lot of links here and elsewhere to polls, most of which aren't worth the $.01 of storage space they occupy.
JH
- Status
