Another confirmation: 33rd. 9mm G18 mags found on shooter

Status
Not open for further replies.
G

glockarmourer40517

member
Joined
Apr 17, 2007
Messages
69
there is a NEW report today , AGAIN SAYING that G18 9mm 33rd. Glock magazines were recovered off the body of the shooter.

-----the report came from a "source" that was reported on the (anti-gun) MSNBC network.
I reported this info a day ago, but there is now more confirmation of same....

**G18 mags (designed for use in g18 selectfire [i.e. fullauto] handguns used by european security, and airport security use, close quarters mini-machineguns)...which is in actuality only a modified G17 with a selector lever which lets the handgun go full-auto...this selector bumps the cruciform plate on each cycle letting the striker repeat (ie machinegun).

**Glocks have always been on the chopping plate by the anti-gunners due to the fact that very simple modification will turn any glock into machine-pistol......NOT to mention the fact that there are 3 manufacturers who made quick-removable collapsable stocks which fit ALL but the subcompact glocks....OR that a company in the USA invented a (a build it yourself design no less) slide cover which turns any glock into a selectfire / fullauto machine-pistol.

*****
Translation ::::: High cap mag ban, with NO expiration date, unlike the 1994 ban.
 
Last edited:
They can ban glocks for all I care I own one and dont plan on buying another one ever. On another note who ever writes the news should study before they pull crap out their ***
 
yes, the news folks are usually idiots when it comes to gun facts, they confuse fullauto with semi, and CNN posted a pic of a G26 with the caption "glock 19".


trashing glocks? ....you just dont know any better, ive worked in 2 gunshoped, owned EVERYTHING....there is nothing more reliable than a glock, has few parts than any other, LOW bore axis.......and the ONLY handgun that can be 100% stripped complete in under few mins WITHOUT tools.

as such, your comment is Doxa (personal conjecture/opinion), rather than the fact that, while not as beautiful as a $2000+ 1911, etc, its the most reliable handgun made.
 
All I can say is that people seem to be coming around to our side. Adam Corrola, who hates guns, said yesterday on his radio show that all these shootings are in gun free zones and that he would actually kind of likes the "Hell's Angles" style atmosphere where if someone starts shooting, they will probably get shot by someone else packing, rather than to depend on the police to do something 10 minutes after the fact.
 
My question is... if he had 33rd Glock magazines, how come he didn't pose with them in his pictures?? It just seems odd to me that he'd make all these "tough guy" pics and wouldn't use the long machine pistol magazines in them.
 
33 round mags?


That still would not have prevented this event.Nothing would have changed.
 
quote::"33 round mags? That still would not have prevented this event.Nothing would have changed."


thats correct, your error however is in ASSUMING the anti-gun scum have common sense , they dont. :D
 
The 33-round G-mag fits in the G17, G19, G26, and G34. How can it really be classified as specifically a "machinegun" magazine?
 
.and the ONLY handgun that can be 100% stripped complete in under few mins WITHOUT tools.
Click to expand...

Me, my spec'd 1911A1s, and John Moses Browning's ghost had a hearty laugh at that nugget.
 
quote:::"The 33-round G-mag fits in the G17, G19, G26, and G34. How can it really be classified as specifically a "machinegun" magazine?""


its specified BY GLOCK INC. as a "g18 mag", also on websites that sell them, such as cdnninvestments.com and other sites........ because IT WAS DISIGNED FOR USE WITH the G18 select-fire pistol.

However, glock, like EVERY COMPANY ON earth, so long as its legal, will sell anything to anyone for $$$, and there are tons and tons of regular citizens that WANT the "cool-ass big honkin 33rd maggie to stick in their G17/G19/G26"

SAME REASON the 30RD. mags used in AR-15 are classified as M16 mags, however most list them as "M16/AR15" mags.

its CLASSIFIED that way, cause thats exactly what the damn hell it is, its a G18 mag, which happens to be USED , SOLD TO , and LOVE BY G17/G19 owners who wanna own one of those "bigass mags". :scrutiny:
 
quote::"Me, my spec'd 1911A1s, and John Moses Browning's ghost had a hearty laugh at that nugget."

a 1911, which i own many of and love, cannot be stripped 100% in anywhere close to the time i can strip any glock, nor is a 1911 in the field, even 1/10th as trustworthy when the muck and dirt are everywhere.

1911 has KNOWN DESIGN flaws......namely: its extractor, its slide pin, its barrel bushing........etc etc. ..........the 1911 experts admit this much. Its a great design, i love my many 1911s, however they cannot size up to a glock in many respects......reliability, bore axis, capacity, durability, simplicity, design........etc. :rolleyes:
 
You were wrong the first time and wrong yet again the second time, but don't let reality get in the way of an illiterate rant.;)
 
Lets not let the thread drift. Nobody should be concerned with the reliability of Glocks versus 1911s or how you can strip each gun.

The point is that the media is going to portray this in the worst light. The fact that he had "high capacity" magazines is what they will use against us. It matters not if they were for a 1911 or a Glock 17 or a Glock 18. In the end it will be used to justify some new draconian antigun laws.
 
Do you have a source for this? No article on MSNBC's website says anything about a 33 rd. mag, and none were visible in his "manifesto."
 
1911 has KNOWN DESIGN flaws......namely: its extractor, its slide pin, its barrel bushing........etc etc. ..........the 1911 experts admit this much. Its a great design, i love my many 1911s, however they cannot size up to a glock in many respects......reliability, bore axis, capacity, durability, simplicity, design........etc.
Click to expand...


From glockarmorer...hmm. Surely an unbiased opinion. :rolleyes:
 
In a Congress which is controlled by Dems, maybe quickly. But it would need 2/3 vote to get by President GWB, once he vetoed the 1st round. Now in 2008 this may change, if a Democrat becomes President.
 
Some seem to have forgotten that Our Glorious Leader said he would sign a new AWB if congress got it to his desk...
 
He may be counting on support that would block the Bill from ever reaching his desk?
I can't see him signing a awb Bill...maybe I'm blindfolded though...we'll have to see.
 
Nobody is going to ban anything without your consent. Are you going to consent or are you going to explain to your representatives that you will replace them if they do not express your will?

It sounds simple, and in some ways it is; but at the end of the day, that is what it comes down to. Nobody can ban anything unless you allow them to.
 
Nobody is going to ban anything without your consent. Are you going to consent or are you going to explain to your representatives that you will replace them if they do not express your will?

It sounds simple, and in some ways it is; but at the end of the day, that is what it comes down to. Nobody can ban anything unless you allow them to.
Click to expand...

That sounds nice, but in reality is completely untrue. My consent, and the consent of this entire forum, is totally unnecessary. We can write as much as we want, cut down an entire forest to make our letters if we wish, but if the numbers are against us then we shall lose.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

H
  • Locked
Most terrifying gun in the world seized.
2 3 4
Replies
98
Views
2K
iapetus
I
D
  • Locked
(Netherlands) Stolen guns (200) found in traffic check
Replies
5
Views
583
Jim K
J
M
  • Locked
Mystery Death at the UN
2
Replies
26
Views
1K
Teufelhunden
T
2
  • Locked
Study backing extension of 'assault weapons' ban draws fire
Replies
5
Views
477
Master Blaster
Master Blaster
P
  • Locked
American Hunters and Shooters Association: Antigun to the core
Replies
2
Views
418
progunner1957
P
Back
Top