Any Other Walther PPK Lovers?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have a Manurhin PPK/S in .380. One of the last ones imported at the end of the Manurhin manufacturing when Walther started making them again in their own plant. One of my favorite pistols.

I don't mind the 'snappiness' of the .380. I shoot a Glock 29, with full power rounds too. o_O
 
My dad took over the Walther factory at the end of WWII. This was a gift they gave him.

(That started me on Walthers)

E0353CD9-AA36-4DE2-9433-1DDD5A9D7FB5.jpeg Nazi PPK. Eagle C

6492A742-B264-4300-898A-81F886216599.jpeg

Interarms PPK in .32 (kinda rare)

6A595B9F-7013-4D8E-822C-5181AE4352CC.jpeg

West German Polizei PPK

D9D110C9-1C2A-4AC6-B941-ADF42FDADA52.jpeg

Just a nice German PP.

AE1CEF8F-D14B-482A-A7D8-8A41F20BDF2D.jpeg

PPK/s in .22. Only one own not in .32.

2418F208-E960-4B69-A198-D84AC85E90B5.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Apparently, I can't edit the post above. Just got home, adding a pic.

Near the end of the Manurhin production and US importation in 1985. Serial number was, initially, beyond the range in Deiter Marschall's book which was, later, corrected.

1.jpg
 
Last edited:
Nope.

Gone through a couple. Like most here, it was the cachet of being the "Bond gun" that first caught my attention. Then the Gun and Ammo article back in the late '70s when the PPK/S came into the country.

I'd rather carry a Makarov in .380 -- at least they work all the time. And with the advent of the SIG P-230/232, there came an option for those that desired a beautifully-crafted and engineered German .380 that actually worked and had excellent ergonomics (something the Walther sorely lacks).
 
I have two, a S&W PPKs and an Interarms PPK. fit and finish are comparable in my opinion, and even with the extended tang on the S&W it did tend to leave bloody red streaks on my shooting hand until I doctored the bottom rear edges of the slide using gentle persuasion on my gray wheel. I have to wonder how bad it would have been without the extended tang!

My Interarms PPK is a safe queen so I haven't shot it, and besides I like the PPKs better because it has regular grip panels.

The guns need to be carried and shot a lot to personalize the manual of arms if you are used to other types of autos which have safeties, as they can be carried like a snub nosed revolver, hammer down, loaded chamber, pull it out, aim squeeze and fire.

But if at times you carry a single action only pistol with safety that's a different drill. Nothing wrong with that but it would possibly be confusing during that first 1/2 second of an unexpected firefight if one carried one type 3 days a week and the other 4 days a week.

The appearance of these guns is similar to many others including the HSC, several Spanish pistols (Astra Constable) and German pistols seldom ever seen but which look similar (Sauer & Sons M38) and eastern satellite state P64 and P63.

There is a lot of differences to nit pick at if one wishes, like some with heel mag releases (Why?), some chambered for cartridges arguably better but somewhat rare, aluminum frames I wouldn't give a nickle for, and the Sig 230 and 232.

I'm very glad Walther started up the Fort Smith factory because that means this design will be around for a long time. The fact that they didn't bother to dovetail the rear sight kept me from buying one though.
 
I too have a Sig p-230 and love it, although it does bite me with some Spanish ammo purchased 20 odd years ago. Can you say hot........ammo.
Wish I had purchased a couple more mags when I bought it though.
With what they are getting for spare mags I might have to take out a second on the mortgage.
 
Mine's a very early production S&W, with the correct (shorter) tang. It runs with total reliability with everything I've fed it, including HP's, so long as the case is brass. It barfs on aluminum ammo... won't feed an A-Zoom snap cap in fact. BTW contrary to Galco, their Ankle Glove fits perfectly. It's the extended tang on later S&W's that interferes, I expect.
 
Apparently, I can't edit the post above. Just got home, adding a pic.

Near the end of the Manurhin production and US importation in 1985. Serial number was, initially, beyond the range in Deiter Marschall's book which was, later, corrected.

View attachment 959788
I must be brain damaged, because Im thinking about buying one just like that- after my last two bad experiences with PP-type guns........
 
I have a blued Manurhin PPK/s I bought off Shotgun News, back in the late eighties, if memory serves. When I first got it, I had some problems with it, but I did a detailed disassembly and found the firing pin was greased up and sticky.

After I cleaned it, it never failed to fire again. I have carried it, and quite appreciated its thinness, and even its weight. Yes, it's all steel, but it's also a blowback design, so the extra weight helped with the recoil. I do not have "meaty" hands, closer to bony really, so slide bite isn't a problem. The only thing I didn't really like was the heavy double action pull on the first shot.

These days, I carry a S&W Shield. It's thin, holds a more potent round, and more of them. Also, with the short recoil action, perceived recoil is milder.

So to answer the O.P., I don't carry my PPks any more, though I would if necessary, and not feel under-armed. On the other hand, I would prefer to be buried in a Tuxedo, and a shoulder holster with my PPks in it than a S&W shield, dontchaknow. :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top