Anybody have an ugly rifle they love?

I actually have 2, but no pictures presently available as they live at my hunting camp. The old camp rifle, an Eddystone M1917 with a pretty classy sporterization likely back in the 40s or 50s and lots of hard mileage since. "Joseph P Noldner" is lovingly electric penciled on the bolt release! I don't think this one was ever re-parked for WWII, rather WWI blued finish that is now mostly a brownish blue patina. Barrel bobbed slightly right through the bomb, and a goofy for lack of a better term stock with a palm swell and a medium cheek riser. Built for a tall aperture sight (the shadow is still there on the receiver and barrel) it also works well with a low mounted optic. The stock is built more like an old time target stock than a hunting stock, so I think it used to be a poor man's Palma or match rifle and later was D/Td for optics and used as a hunting Sporter. It has an early glass bed job of high quality. I paid the princely sum of $150 for it including a beat up but serviceable El Paso K4 some 18 years ago.

The other is a hacksaw M44 Mosin that I found at a garage sale for $50. Somebody had taken a hacksaw to the folding bayonet and started the ATI scrap metal scope mount. Thankfully they didn't purchase the plastic stock also, as the original stock is still on the rifle in serviceable condition. I've had to oil finish it as the original shellac is long gone. I finished the scope mount and put a too large and heavy 1980's 3x9 on it to see what it would do. It shoots FAR better than it should. Handloads it likes will shoot under an inch including the Hor 174RN and 123 Vmax, Czech surplus around 2. It just balances right with that heavy steel tube 3x9 and that helps eat the substantial recoil. This one stays at the cabin for slicking crows off far away trees and casual shooting with the pile of surplus ammo and old silo blocks I am still working on expending.

I LOVE both of these rifles as they are stupid accurate and reliable. They will always fire, they will always shoot where you aim them. They are both the type you don't mind slogging through a swamp with or tossing in the sleigh behind a snowmobile for a wolf hunt (God willing we get to do that again!).
 
I have one of the original style HI-Point 9mm carbines. Always looked to me like a gorilla soldier extra off of Planet of the Apes dropped it and it was then sold at a studio auction. Weird looking ugly and ridiculously accurate. Was $99 NIB at a gunshow many years ago. My favorite cheap gun of all time!
 
I have always liked guns with honest wear on them. Some of them you might call ugly. Like the one I got 40+ years ago.
index.php

She started as your basic, garden variety 10/22. I've put a Hogue stock and a little red dot on there, and got her a trigger job. She may not be the perfect "teaching rifle," but she does a damn fine job.
 
I still want an STG58 clone, they're ugly but cool.
Just a range toy, too heavy for anything else.
Problem is, factory sights suck and optics mounting is less than ideal.
Cool factory is high, and they are comfy to shoot.
But a lot of money for what they are IMHO.

Why I don't have one.
 
My dad's Ruger #1 is well worn, to the point its ugly.
But it still shoots, and was his rifle, so I leave it as is.
.22-250 isn't my fave varmint cartridge either.
 
JMHO, but I personally reserve the appellation of a "pretty " gun to a nice figured piece of walnut or maple and fine bluing. I see VERY few guns at the range these days that fit my definition of " pretty ". Most look like something out of Star Wars.
 
Just 1/4 ugly; to me it is ugly in a cool way.

My all-stock PTR-91, clone of the G3, HK-91. Here are members of the German Bundeswehr.
🇩🇪Some of their Designated Marksmen carried the "fancy" versions until a few years ago. I'm well aware that only two of these soldiers have a G3.:) Genau....nur zwei.

About five days ago I chatted with a Federal Police officer in front of the Munich Rathaus/Town Hall, whose MP5 has the same basic action.

H73%20(1).jpg
 
Last edited:
Gun looks are certainly subjective. I have never been one to look at modern guns and think, "oh that is a good looking pistol or rifle" I see them as plastic/metal and utilitarian - practical and designed for what they were intended to do in all environments. I find the guns with wood, metal engraving and good craftsmanship to have a sense of beauty. So for me, I guess no ugly guns, but most are plain and practical and some have beauty. My Sharps rifles and Colt Peacemaker have beauty but everything else is just average looking. I have an M1917 that many think is ugly but in my mind, it is no different than the other milsurps I have.
 
Surely we’ve all got at least one ugly rifle that just keeps hanging around. Maybe it’s a beater with a ton of sentimental value. Maybe it’s like mine and it’s a paint job gone horribly wrong. Maybe it’s some strange conglomeration of parts that just turned out to be fun. I’ll go first. My ugly rifle is a Seekins Precision SP223 that I dropped an 18” Dracos 6.5 Grendel barrel in a few years ago. The zombie green barrels were on sale for 50%, so I thought, why the heck not. After I got the barrel I decided the rifle needed some Cerakote to match the barrel, so I found a Multicam pattern online that incorporated some of that zombie green Cerakote. It actually looked really good. The pattern subdued the bright green to a degree that it was quite tolerable. I called up my Cerakote guy and asked if he could replicate the pattern and colors used. I actually gave him the color list. Long story short, what I ordered and what I received did not match up, but I’d been without the rifle for several months and I’m not really a complainer, so I just rolled with it. Problem is, I was so disappointed with the paint job, that the rifle just collected dust in the safe for a couple years and rarely saw the light of day. This year, I just decided to enjoy the danged thing for what it was and threw a thermal scope on it and decided to pig hunt with it and I’ll just be damned if it isn’t growing on me. Shoots lights out, and it’s a decent balance of weight and length. It’s still ugly, but I doubt I’ll ever get rid of it, or have it re-painted. View attachment 1172867View attachment 1172866
Ugly rifles are “shooters.”

Purty rifles are Safe Queens and, occasionally, overpriced eyeball candy for the table droolers at the regional Fun Show.

You’ve got a great shooter right there. :thumbup:
 
Just a note, that I must have one or two rifles with all-wooden furniture, to have both the color and natural character to offset the black plastic of the other two .308 battle rifles.

Is this a common preference or requirement? Ugly can mean having no guns with natural color.
 
Back
Top