Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Anyone carry a Bersa 45 Ultra Compact-Review

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by Airbrush Artist, Feb 16, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Airbrush Artist

    Airbrush Artist member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2013
    Messages:
    333
    Location:
    Kettering,Ohio
    I have got My everyday carry choice down to a Bersa -now I'm debating on a 45 ultra compact or a 380..Just looking for some input..Thanks
     
  2. Milkbus

    Milkbus Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2013
    Messages:
    7
    That is a huge difference in power. A .380 could be pocket carried, but IMHO the Thunder 380 is a bit heavy for the front pocket. The Thunder .45 UC is definitely not going in a pocket and will have a major stopping power advantage over the .380.

    Why not look at their .40 or 9mm? Same size as the .45 with higher capacities.
     
  3. zerofournine

    zerofournine Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2013
    Messages:
    36
    I have the 45 UC and two Bersa 380's. I have never had a ftf or fte from any of the three, so I trust them to be dependable carry pistols. The 45 is a bit too wide for me to carry comfortably, but that is personal preference really. I would carry, and have carried the 380 without hesitation. My wife packs one in her purse. Someday I plan on getting the conceal carry model, and it will be my Sunday carry.
     
  4. Trad Archer

    Trad Archer Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2010
    Messages:
    274
    I have the UCPro in 40........love it.......10+1
     
  5. Snowdog

    Snowdog Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    3,942
    Location:
    Hendersonville, WNC
    I bought a Bersa UC9 Pro on a lark a few years ago and am still tickled pink by it.

    It's one of the very few handguns I've owned that skipped the whole break-in period; it was reliable from round one.

    I understand many among us think of .380acp when they think Bersa, however the 9mm, .40S&W and .45acp Thunder UC and HC models represent one heck of a value and bring more to the table, IMO.

    Though the UC (ultra compact) nomenclature is a bit deceiving, it is still very much a compact, being about the size of a Cz-82.

    4097532425_c64559c135_z.jpg
     
  6. Airbrush Artist

    Airbrush Artist member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2013
    Messages:
    333
    Location:
    Kettering,Ohio
    Great point Snow dog,The focus is on the 380 ,I thought why not look at a Higher caliber ..in the Bersa line .gonna do some more homework on the .40 &.45 ...Thank You all
     
  7. Dean1818

    Dean1818 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2010
    Messages:
    913
    Location:
    Texas!
    I had a UC40. Decent gun but it is too thick for comfortable IWB carry

    Imho
     
  8. Nasty

    Nasty Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2004
    Messages:
    534
    +2 for the UC series...I carry a stainless 45 UC myself and have not had a single issue in hundreds of thousands of rounds (I used to have unlimited ammo running the base range).

    I see no reason for the .380 in today's market with small 45's and tiny 9mm's available.
     
  9. schnarrgj

    schnarrgj Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2008
    Messages:
    158
    Location:
    Saint Peters, MO
    Have both the 45UC and the BT380. Like everyone else, after a number of thousand rounds through each, not one problem. Well one. After adjusting the rear sight, I didn't lock the screw and the blade fell off. Called the service center and had another blade for the BT380 in a few days. Right now I the BT380 on my belt. Love them both and carry them both. I vary my carry depending on where I am going, time of year and phase of the moon.:D

    My wife carries the BT380. She loves it.
     
  10. WCraven

    WCraven Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2012
    Messages:
    99
    For the 380/9mm/40/45 it going be hard to beat Kahr CW line..
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page