The remarkably funny thing about people who have an irrational dislike of Glocks is that they become insulting towards not only the firearms but the owners of them.It's as if movies conditioned me to believe my 19 and 22 are the ultimate firearms and that I'm an idiot for forsaking the 1911's,BHP,SIG's,S&W's,Walthers and even the Beretta in my safe for shooting them because eventually,it's going to KaBoom or " just go off".It has nothing at all to do with the fact that both of my Glocks have fired more rounds than most handguns will see in their lifetime and I indeed shoot them well enough.
While there are some rabid Glock fans out there,most Glock owners will simply tell you that " they're just functional,reliable,affordable tools".It's fairly insulting to the great number of people who have fired and owned many,many different handguns that choosing to own or carry a Glock simply comes down to " drinking the Koolaid" and infers that we simply don't know any better or couldn't shoot our way out of a wet paper bag.
It's incredible the number of people who say things like "I'd rather have a Lorcin/wouldn't have a Block if you gave it to me" who've never actually fired one.It's nice to know that there's no point trusting personal experience when the internet and gun magazines can guide you.
I owned probably 2 dozen others before I ever tried a Glock and admit that I didn't much care for the ergonomics or trigger at first and having started with a SA Browning,the lack of hammer and safety had me worried for a bit.I'd like to think that I came to understand the purpose in design and strengths and weaknesses of it rather than simply dumbed myself down into thinking it's actually quite safe,accurate enough and exceptionally easy to feed and care for.