Anyone here have a Smython/Smolt

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mn Fats

Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2017
Messages
2,372
I've been wanting to send my 686 and a 6" Colt Python barrel to Ten Ring Precision for a Smython build (I hate the sound of "Smolt")

The idea was the stronger S&W action with the more accurate Colt barrel made for an ideal, accurate revolver. Not sure about that, but I find them very unique and plain cool. I'm finding Python barrels for $300ish. Ten Ring Precision says they'll do it for $500 I believe.

Anyone here use Ten Ring Precision? Anyone have a Smython/Smolt?
 
Interesting concept. Have not heard of these, but I like stuff that is off the beaten path. Thanks for sharing, and hopefully someone else with experience will step in.
 
Always liked the fenestrations over the Python barrels.

Is the Smith & Wesson action really stronger than that of Colt's?

I only have a few Smiths and one Ruger - haven't read on this before.
 
Last edited:
Always like the fenestrations over the Python barrels.

Is the Smith & Wesson action really stronger than that of Colt's?

I only have a few Smiths and one Ruger - haven't read on this before.
Classic Colt actions only have 2 locking points, at the bolt and hand (and the bolts are tiny compared to S&W)- they are completely unsupported at the front of the cylinder, unlike S&W or Ruger. They also have more contact points and the sideplate fit is critical to laterally locating the hand. When they are in new condition, they lock up tighter, but are more susceptible to wear and frame stretch effecting timing.
I like Colt revolvers, but ya, its not the best design and IMO, the S&W is stronger.
 
Classic Colt actions only have 2 locking points, at the bolt and hand (and the bolts are tiny compared to S&W)- they are completely unsupported at the front of the cylinder, unlike S&W or Ruger. They also have more contact points and the sideplate fit is critical to laterally locating the hand. When they are in new condition, they lock up tighter, but are more susceptible to wear and frame stretch effecting timing.
I like Colt revolvers, but ya, its not the best design and IMO, the S&W is stronger.
^^^^^^^^^ This! I own both types of revolvers and in my posts I always mention that my preference goes to S&W this is one of the reasons and the other, to me the action is smoother as well.
 
I remember reading about the “Smolt” conversions in the 80’s Handguns Magazine. Just as cool of an idea today.
 
Classic Colt actions only have 2 locking points, at the bolt and hand (and the bolts are tiny compared to S&W)- they are completely unsupported at the front of the cylinder, unlike S&W or Ruger. They also have more contact points and the sideplate fit is critical to laterally locating the hand. When they are in new condition, they lock up tighter, but are more susceptible to wear and frame stretch effecting timing. I like Colt revolvers, but ya, its not the best design and IMO, the S&W is stronger.

Thanks, good to know...

I remember reading about the “Smolt” conversions in the 80’s Handguns Magazine. Just as cool of an idea today.

Retro is kewl! :cool:
 
Performance or cool factor?
Shoot $800 better than the 686---Not for me. The 686s I have shot were very accurate.
Cool factor---Don't care about it. Never bought into the cool factor thing.
 
Why not just install a custom match grade barrel on that S&W ?
Performance or cool factor?
Shoot $800 better than the 686---Not for me. The 686s I have shot were very accurate.
Cool factor---Don't care about it. Never bought into the cool factor thing.
Unique factor is all. They were put together by competition guys back in the day who truly believed the Python barrel would enhance accuracy. For me it would be negligible anyway. But the mix and match is somewhat historical in that sense.

Just a unique gun is all. One I've been pining over for years. Everyone has one of those. Or a few.
Ten Ring Precision is a good outfit.
Good to know :thumbup: I like a lot of the stuff they offer.
Classic Colt actions only have 2 locking points, at the bolt and hand (and the bolts are tiny compared to S&W)- they are completely unsupported at the front of the cylinder, unlike S&W or Ruger. They also have more contact points and the sideplate fit is critical to laterally locating the hand. When they are in new condition, they lock up tighter, but are more susceptible to wear and frame stretch effecting timing.
I like Colt revolvers, but ya, its not the best design and IMO, the S&W is stronger.
Very well put, NightLord.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top