MatthewVanitas
Member
Greetings. I recently saw the pics of the WWI repro that Colt put out not too long ago. Beautiful piece of gear, though I can't think of any immediately compelling reason to replace my Sistema with one, and would fret far too much about the bluing.
I noticed the differences from pre-A1 and A1 models, which appear to be:
1) Flat mainspring housing
2) Different hammer
3) Longer trigger
4) Shorter tail on grip safety
5) Different sights
I assume that few folks prefer pre-A1 sights, as folks complain about the Gov't model sights enough as it is (though I don't find them particularly unpleasant, but I'm only 25).
Under what conditions are the other three options preferable to the A1 variants? Any folks out there like the old MSH, trigger, hammer?
I'm pretty small-handed, so I've never been bothered by hammer bite. Thus I wonder if the pre-A1 hammer and smaller grip safety would have any advantages for me, or at least provide a distinctive look with no disadvantages. Ditto for the flat MSH. When I grip my Sistema, my hand barely even touches the swell of the MSH, so not sure that the bulkier version does any better job filling my particular hand.
So far as the older trigger, not sure if that would have any upside for me.
After grad school is out of the way, I may finally break down and get a custom 1911. I like retro (when not impractical), and am small-handed, so am idly considering getting a CCO with gov't or pre-A1 outfittings (maybe some minor concessions on sights). Basically a downsized war-era 1911, but in stainless for long-term durability. The project is still a couple years down the road, but it's fun to ponder.
Thanks for any info from those who have tried out pre-A1 configurations, and especially any happy owners (shooters?) or the Colt WWI repros.
-MV
I noticed the differences from pre-A1 and A1 models, which appear to be:
1) Flat mainspring housing
2) Different hammer
3) Longer trigger
4) Shorter tail on grip safety
5) Different sights
I assume that few folks prefer pre-A1 sights, as folks complain about the Gov't model sights enough as it is (though I don't find them particularly unpleasant, but I'm only 25).
Under what conditions are the other three options preferable to the A1 variants? Any folks out there like the old MSH, trigger, hammer?
I'm pretty small-handed, so I've never been bothered by hammer bite. Thus I wonder if the pre-A1 hammer and smaller grip safety would have any advantages for me, or at least provide a distinctive look with no disadvantages. Ditto for the flat MSH. When I grip my Sistema, my hand barely even touches the swell of the MSH, so not sure that the bulkier version does any better job filling my particular hand.
So far as the older trigger, not sure if that would have any upside for me.
After grad school is out of the way, I may finally break down and get a custom 1911. I like retro (when not impractical), and am small-handed, so am idly considering getting a CCO with gov't or pre-A1 outfittings (maybe some minor concessions on sights). Basically a downsized war-era 1911, but in stainless for long-term durability. The project is still a couple years down the road, but it's fun to ponder.
Thanks for any info from those who have tried out pre-A1 configurations, and especially any happy owners (shooters?) or the Colt WWI repros.
-MV