Anyone see an MDS on polycoated bullets?

Status
Not open for further replies.
S

sbwaters

Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2016
Messages
638
Location
Rome, NY
Have been loading poly coated bullets and love them. One company says their poly coat is “proprietary.”

Okay. Someone I know found out the hard way about PTFOE from making circuit boards.

I’d kinda like to know what, aside from lead, I’m working with. Anyone have a good idea?
 
sbwaters said:
Have been loading poly coated bullets and love them. One company says their poly coat is “proprietary.”

Okay. Someone I know found out the hard way about PTFOE from making circuit boards.

I’d kinda like to know what, aside from lead, I’m working with. Anyone have a good idea?
Click to expand...

Proprietary is one way of saying it, and under current law they are protected from being forced to say exactly what is in their product. If you get right down to it, "Confidential Business Information" is just that. I would think that you would be able to get the information though. I have plenty experience digging up SDS, and old school MSDS. Shoot me a pm and let me know exactly what bullet your using and I will try to get you an answer. If I need to I can send a formal request, I'm good with that too.
 
I have the MSDS for a Sandstorm coating and the older 2 part liquid Hi-Tek one. I moved since I received them so not sure how long it would take to put my fingers on them.

What are you trying to figure out?
 
http://www.pcimag.com/articles/the-effect-of-crosslinking-chemistry-on-superdurable-powder-coatings " Due to concerns with the toxicity of TGIC, powder coatings that contain more than 0.1% of the compound would have to carry a warning label that included the European Toxic label, which includes a skull and crossbones logo. The performance of TGIC in weathering is quite good, so this has significantly affected the use of the crosslinker in superdurable architectural coatings. If suitable replacements are found that can perform as well or better, they could be used to replace this compound. Clearly a need has developed in the European marketplace.

The United States does not yet have the same labeling requirement and there are no indications that a similar labeling requirement is imminent. However, most of the major powder coating producers operate globally and wish to have formulations that are universal. These requirements have encouraged North American producers to also look at alternatives to TGIC. " https://www.osha.gov/dts/chemicalsampling/data/CH_273775.html
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top