Anyone take a class like this?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jun 11, 2007
Messages
393
Advanced Tactics for Concealed Carry

STG would like to offer their Advanced Tactics for Concealed Carry course. This course will be shot from the concealed carry position only. Every piece of gear you use should be the same you carry day to day. The range time will cover Close Range Engagements, Multiple Target Engagements, Cover, Shooting from Cover, and with drawl from the engagement. This class will be a piggy back to the advanced pistol class in 2008. We will also discuss weapon retention, and Close Quarter Battle (CQB) tactics

This is the group I received my CCP training from and took an advanced handgun course. This is interesting and only $65.
 
No I haven't but it sounds interesting and a good deal at that price. Where is it going to be held?
 
Moved to a more appropriate forum.

This would be Strategic Tactical Group LLC, right?

http://www.strategictacticalgroup.com/


I don't know anything about them, so I can't comment one way or the other. Their instructors aren't listed on their website, so I can't evaluate how good the training might even be based on credentials.


I will mention $65 is cheap, really cheap, for good training. Perhaps too cheap . . . I can't see this being anything more than a one day class at that price, and adequately covering all those topics listed in the course description in 10 hours or less is a real stretch.
 
Class is being held in Utah.

I've taken one class from STG and it was good - Advanced Handgun.
 
BullfrogKen, $65 is too cheap, true. But if it is actually a piggy-back class as described, that is merely $65 in addition to the cost of the Advanced class it is added to.

Then it might make more financial sense for the instructors.
 
I don't know, dav. $65 doesn't even cover the cost of the facility rental at our Club.


I think I have a pretty good idea about the business and what it takes to do a class right. The insurances, taxes, range rental fee (unless the organization owns it facilities like Gunsite) . . . I can't see how a class like this can even get out of the red . . .


Unless it cuts corners . . .


elkhuntingfool, I don't want to speak ill of someone you know . . . but something's just not right here. I looked at the rest of the classes offered. "Advanced Pistol" is a one day class for $60, firing only 200-300 rounds. "Basic Pistol" is one day, $50 at 100-200 rounds. I can't see how I can achieve "advanced level skills" in 2 days of instruction with only 300-500 rounds downrange.


Most tuition fees for professional level courses costs between $125 to $225 a day for an 8-10 hour class of quality instruction with range time, and the entry level defensive pistol classes start at 2 days with probably 800 rounds minimum. NRA classes are often less, but NRA classes aren't really something I'd say is on par with professional defensive firearms training. I'd have to wonder why the rest of the market seems to settle in around that price window for fees, but this place is 1/2 to 1/3 the price.

I can't find any credentials or bios about the instructors. I'm not asserting its second rate, but there isn't any information provided for me to even decide if it is or it isn't. Guys who have something to offer in this business usually make it a point to mention why they feel they have something special to convince you to spend your training dollars and time with them.


Substandard instruction can be worse than none at all.

Training is one area we shouldn't scrimp on. I'll buy a cheap, police trade-in model 10 Smith & Wesson and feel OK with it. Pursuing substandard training can instill bad habits and bad techniques, and unfortunately some students aren't experienced enough to be able to tell the difference. I know we all like to get bargains, but you usually get what you pay for in life.


I'm seeing course material like concealed draw techniques, mutiple targets, and movement to/from cover thrown in with CQB, and weapons retention. I know what it takes to instruct that material properly, make sure the student understands the concepts, and then gets enough repetitions on the technique in the class so he can go home and continue to practice it properly on his own. I couldn't imagine the trainers I know seriously suggest they were going to teach the average armed citizen CQB techniques in an 8 hour class, and think at the end of the day he did the student well. In fact, I know they won't do that. This class has it crammed in with all other kinds of material. All that material mentioned in the ad, to be taught properly and to get in enough range time to have it considered professional instruction, takes no less than 55 hours, or probably 6 days minimum. And I can't see it done with less than 1,000 rounds; even that's a stretch.


I wouldn't want to go in front of the IRS with a bookkeeper that had a couple semisters of accounting classes. I wouldn't want to go in front of a judge with a paralegal. I wouldn't want to rely on training from a guy who I wasn't confident had a quality cirriculum.


Just my .02. elkhuntingfool, you put it out for discussion. That's my opinion.
 
$65 is cheap, really cheap, for good training. Perhaps too cheap
Agreed. :scrutiny:

BullfrogKen's analysis jibes withi what I know of the economics of good training i.e. getting it is expensive (Not getting could be even more expensive IMHO but that is another story.)

If somone offers to sell me a new car for 1/2 to1/3 of it's listed value it raises my hackles. I get the same feeling from the data presented so far.

As always I could be wrong.

NukemJim
 
Good training can be had without spending thousands of dollars but I don't think covering all those topics is going to be done well in one day.

There's an old saying that goes something like, "The easiest way to teach someone nothing is to try to teach them everything."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top