Anyone use Iron sights for hunting?

Status
Not open for further replies.

EMNofSeattle

Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2012
Messages
44
Location
The Emerald of the West Coast
I was wondering if anyone used Irons for hunting. The only rifles I presently have that meet state laws for hunting are a Mosin and a #1 enfield, neither can accept a scope. so I was just wondering if anyone had hunted with irons and if they found it particularily difficult compared to hunting with a scope.
 
I shot a doe back in the woods at 60 yards with my Win 94 and old notch and post sights.
Open sights is pretty much all I use back in the woods.

I would feel comfortable to about 100 yards. For deer hunting, just make sure you can hit an 8 inch circle at your desired distance pretty much every time.
 
No, the only difference from shooting at most hunting distances (at least for me) with iron sights and using a scope is you won't get your pretty little 1" 5 shot group. Like was said above, keep it in a kill zone sized area, and you're fine. I like to use a paper plate, the 7-9" plates do just fine for telling you if you can hit something.

There are very few deer or hog with 2" kill zones, so don't worry about making the perfect groups and just make sure you can get it in the zone. My .30-30 doesn't have a scope on it and it does just fine at the distances I usually hunt, which is 50-100 yards.

If you're planning on 300 or 400 yard shots, you might want to practice quite a bit, but up to around 150 yards, you should be ok.

Edit: Forgot to add, this past weekend I shot my new muzzle loader for the first time. At 50 yards (with open sights) it was shooting 3" low right out of the box. Moved the rear sight to aim up, dead on. Next week I'll test it at 100 to find out where I need to aim when I'm shooting 100 yard distances, but I'll leave the sights set at 50, because both of my stands only have shooting distances of about 50 yards around them.
 
That was what I used to use all the time. Open sights on a Marlin 336 was good enough for my eyes at any distance I felt the round had business taking deer at.
 
I use my Springfield Armory M1A standard loaded with irons for hogs. aint afraid to shoot at 300 yards. thought of scoping it, but got to put a cheek piece and special mount on it. I like the classic looks of it anyway. also shoot my old model 94 with no scope, the trajectory of a 30-30 just dont make it a long shooter.
 
SKS

As long as you can hit the kill zone consistently at your expected range, there is no reason not to shoot iron sights. Faster target acquisition is one benefit.

My SKS is my 'bush gun' within 150 or so yards, when I'm bushwhacking or rock-hopping.

Practice your field positions with hunting gear.
 
Around here, if a man can't get within half a football field's length of a deer at least now and again, he's doin' it wrong... like jumping jacks in a sequined, bell festooned track suit soaked in panther pee, upwind at high noon WRONG. Scopes are optional.
 
I have shot two coyotes this year with my Mini-14 and factory sights. One shot was 40yds and the other was at 80yds.
 
My first game other than bird that I took was a 130 lb pig shot at approximately 30-40 yards with a Browning 1895 30-06 with irons. Where I hunt in OK most shots will be well under 100 yards.
 
I hunt deer here in Wisconsin with a Win M94 and irons. It works but I think that a scope would work better, especially in low-light situations and even more so as I get older. In fact, the next time I can scrounge up enough cabbage to buy another gun it's probably going to be a bolt 'n scope deer rifle. By the time there is enough light to tell the difference between the deer, the front sight, and a tree, the deer have all bedded down for the day. YMMV.
 
Irons

All of my hunting rifles have iron sights.
About the Moisin....you can scope it as picture and you can install a scout type mount and scope. The K 31 is also scope able.

Pete
 
I am quite tempted to use my woods gun in that way with my Skinner peep sights on my .444 Marlin. I can put a 1.5 inch group at 100 yards. My other option is my BLR in .300 WSM with an adjustable scope. For me, I love shooting my Marlin more than the BLR and it is a better bear defense weapon with the high powered Buffalo Bore loads for .444. Quite tempting to say the least.
 
My Winchester 94 has a Williams peep sight. My Ruger Ranch rifle just uses the standard rear sight. Both are fine and out to about 150 yds accurate enough.

I usually draw 2 firearms licenses and try to use the 94 on one of the deer.
 
No scope for me.

I hunt deer and hogs with a saiga in 762x39 with irons. I did replace the rear sight leaf with a Krebs aperture tho.

I usually hunt on the move in heavy brush. 25-50 yards is quite common. But I'd feel comfortable taking a 150yd shot.
 
I prefer iron to optics.

When I was a kid, I literally wore out BB guns. If I didn't shoot a million BBs then I came pretty darn close. All were equipped iron sights and this is where I developed my proficiency with, and preference for, iron sights.
 
On just a few rifles.

1903A3 Issue sights
1907 Swede m/94 Carbine issue sights
m/38 and m/96 same thing
CG-63 target sights.

1886 Win -buckhorn sights
Sharps 50-90 vernier peep sights.
1892 38wcf- issue buckhorn sight

1840s 69 caliber Mountain Rifle open sight notch


Modified Ruger M-77/MKII Sourdough rifle, Detachable Peep sight for when the sun goes down and I am walking back to camp.

Plus I have a couple 22s around here with open sights.
 
My 12 ga. and 30-30 are not scoped on purpose: doing nasty drives in the tamerack swamps, don't need the extra weight, and don't need the extra tangle hassle...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top