content
Member
Hello friends and neighbors // Lots of folks with the same tools/toys and diffferent opinons when comparing them should tell you something.
Other than "Luck of the Draw" you need a great gunsmith.
Right now I have 8 .357s.
2 S&W a 586 nd, 6", 1983 and a 28-2, 4", 1976 both with the triggers smoothed by the same man.
2 DW 15-2s, a 1977 and 1978 PP ,both Monson, no GS work
2 Colt Pythons a 1961 and a 1983, no GS work
2 Ruger Sixes, Security and Service, no GS work
From a purely trigger point of view the 1961 Python of the unworked and 1983 586 overall.
More time carrying and shooting the 586 probably has a great deal to do with this.
Of the unworked revolvers the 1978 DW 15-2 is closest to the Python.
My worked 28 is still probably no comparison to a good 27 but turned out quite smooth. The weight of the 28 just makes for a harder comparison than the Dan Wesson 15-2 to the Python.
The right GS's trigger work can make your S&W( or other) a dream, just like the wrong GS could make your Python a nightmare.
Other than "Luck of the Draw" you need a great gunsmith.
Right now I have 8 .357s.
2 S&W a 586 nd, 6", 1983 and a 28-2, 4", 1976 both with the triggers smoothed by the same man.
2 DW 15-2s, a 1977 and 1978 PP ,both Monson, no GS work
2 Colt Pythons a 1961 and a 1983, no GS work
2 Ruger Sixes, Security and Service, no GS work
From a purely trigger point of view the 1961 Python of the unworked and 1983 586 overall.
More time carrying and shooting the 586 probably has a great deal to do with this.
Of the unworked revolvers the 1978 DW 15-2 is closest to the Python.
My worked 28 is still probably no comparison to a good 27 but turned out quite smooth. The weight of the 28 just makes for a harder comparison than the Dan Wesson 15-2 to the Python.
The right GS's trigger work can make your S&W( or other) a dream, just like the wrong GS could make your Python a nightmare.