no need to design an AR-compatible magazine for it, just use the AK-74 mags that are dirt friggin cheap
The AK magazines won't work in an AR lower. They have an entirely different geometry and lock in just like the '47 mags do, by "rocking" them into seated position. There is no provision for a mag release cutout like on the AR series of magazines.
For the record, I have fired many many thousands of rounds of corrosively primed AK74 ammo through my rifles, and I clean them as soon as I get home. That rusty hulk up there was exposed to far more moisture than one would ordinarily receive, and it doesn't appear to have been cleaned. The parts in that rifle have no evidence of having been cleaned, the receiver is caked with firing residue. No self respecting rifleman would do that to a rifle. There is no evidence of lube on any of the reciprocating parts. I suspect VERY STRONGLY that the piece depicted above was horribly abused, perhaps left buried in someone's garden or something during spring rainy season.
If you clean up properly after shooting corrosively primed ammo, you will have no issues in an AK like that. None of my rifles has rusted, and neither will yours if you clean it.
The AR with its long gas tube, which is difficult at best to get clean, may have different issues, as I know of no reliable method to remove residue from a gas tube like that.
I suspect that the standard AR magazines would come close to feeding the 5.45, as many people convert 5.45 AK mags to feed 5.56 by changing out the follower. It must be very nearly a good fit.
That said, the 5.45 in its military loading is a better round than is the 5.56, both for penetration and wounding properties. It doesn't rely upon velocity to do its thing as does the 5.56.
In all, if you really want to shoot 5.45, I'd just purchase an AK and enjoy it, rather than an AR upper receiver.