NoHillForAHighStepper
member
Since the 243 Win is based on the 308 case, why aren't there more AR10's or mini 30's chambered in 243? That is an AR that I would be interested in owning. 5.56, 308, 300 blk are mediocre cartridges, IMHO.
I think you're looking for a 6.5 grendel or .224 Valkyrie to balance that out.Since the 243 Win is based on the 308 case, why aren't there more AR10's or mini 30's chambered in 243? That is an AR that I would be interested in owning. 5.56, 308, 300 blk are mediocre cartridges, IMHO.
223 vs 22-250 or 220 Swift?I’m interested in how you define mediocre cartridges. It would seem to me, .308 blows the consistency of that list If it’s based on power. Unless your list is based on trajectory/ballistics. In that case, .223 blows the list. So I’m stumped.
I should have defined them as ballistically inferior maybe? Although, the 308 is closer to the 30-06 than I realized..308 is superior to .30-06 or .300 winchester mag in an autoloading action because it's shorter, cycles better, and weighs less per cartridge (which is important for military applications). Barrels also last longer than with higher-velocity .30-06 or .300 win mag loads.
Similarly, 5.56/.223 is superior to .22-250 or .220 swift because of improved barrel life and reduced ammunition weight, and a shorter action.
For a hobbyist or hunter, these may not be major concerns, but for military and mass market appeal, they are.
.223 1:7 beats a .22-250 1-14......just sayingI should have defined them as ballistically inferior maybe? Although, the 308 is closer to the 30-06 than I realized.
I was actually looking for a longer range varmint rifle in an AR platform. The 243, if loaded with 80-90 grainers, will carry more energy downrange than a 5.56. Granted, you probably need to be 350 yards+ to see the advantage but it is there...i was once helplessly misguided in thinking the 243 was a great cartrige .shot several deer and the only one that said OMG i have been shot is the one that got it in the head .
Cuz for me if I were to get an AR-10 type rifle it would be in 7mm-08, and if I were to get two, the second would be in .338 Federal.Since the 243 Win is based on the 308 case, why aren't there more AR10's or mini 30's chambered in 243? That is an AR that I would be interested in owning. 5.56, 308, 300 blk are mediocre cartridges, IMHO.
Totally true and I’m surprised no mainstream manufacturers make a 22-250 with a 1:7 twist. Whittaker’s did have a special run of Tikka’s with 1:8 twist a couple of years ago. They sold out fast..223 1:7 beats a .22-250 1-14......just saying
This was my hunch but I was hoping somebody had some experience with one to lend me some of their wisdom. Thank you...I bought an Armalite AR10 chambered in 308 prior to 2001 and the first “accessory” I bought for it was an extra Armalite upper chambered for 243.
The early Armalite 243 uppers were of the “flat top” variety a with a 20” barrel (which kinda shorts the shooter on performance reference the 243 cartridge).
My experience with the factory 243 upper was that it was difficult for me to get “gilt” edged accuracy with and it was overgassed with handloads when trying to get the velocity up to reflect full 243 potential (it was not uncommon for primers to fall out of the primer pockets due to the bolt opening too soon well before I got to max Powder. charges.
Now, keep in mind this was 20 years ago when Armalite was the only AR10 game in town (Knights Armament had the SR25 but nobody could afford one), the internet was brand new and nobody had heard of (let alone were making and selling) adjustable gas blocks, heavier buffers and buffer springs etc.
It took considerable patience and burning a whole lot of different powders and trying a bunch of bullets before I figured out what I had to do to get it to shoot the way I wanted.
Once I got it running the way I wanted and got the accuracy node for my handloads up to my standards accuracy I hunted varmints with it exclusively for about 4 years and killed a whole bunch of coyotes and bobcats with it.
View attachment 926003
View attachment 926004
View attachment 926005
During the years I hunted with it, I trained several young hunters in the art of varmint calling and that rifle with the 243 upper always left a lasting impression on them.
Some of those guys still stay in touch and when we talk they always ask if I still have that bad ass green 243 we killed all them coyotes with.
I always answer yes and they invariably comment that if I ever wanted to sell it to please give them first refusal.
If they only knew what it took for me to get it shooting the way I wanted they would never asked.
.223 1:7 beats a .22-250 1-14......just saying
I think you are still conflating the two AR frame sizes. The 6.8 and Creedmoor are too disparate to compare.I'm not sure it will ever be a popular combination now that the 6.5 Creedmore and 6.8 SPC are available. IMHO, the 243 was over-rated as a deer cartridge. I think as a long-range varmint round in the AR platform, it might have found more popularity? But the 22-250 and 220 Swift are hard to beat....or the 17 Remington.
I disagree. What do you base your opinion on? You also say, “was”, does that mean it used to be over-rated but isn’t over-rated now?IMHO, the 243 was over-rated as a deer cartridge.