Hey all,
I happened to stop at a new Gander Mountain store that opened up here recently, and I was checking out their selection of Glocks when I noticed something interesting. The grip width of the 10mm/.45acp models did not appear any thicker (from side to side) than the 9mm/.40 models. I was always under the impression that it wasn't just the slide that was fatter, but the grip was thicker too. However, today I noticed that the slides of the larger caliber guns were actually fatter and basically flush with the width of the grip, while the 9mm and .40 models have a slide that is thinner than the grip by a good 1/16" on each side. Other than that, the grips appear to be the same width. If the larger caliber guns have a thicker grip, it must not be by much. I wish I got to compare them for myself today, but I didn't ask to see any of the 10mm's or .45's because I already checked out a g35 and they were pretty busy with other customers. Just didn't want to be a pain I guess considering I wasn't going to buy anything.
The reason I'm asking is because I held a 21sf a few weeks ago and it felt amazing in my hand. I told myself it wouldn't work for me because I already liked the feel of my g17 and I didn't want to get used to a thicker grip. Now I'm thinking maybe the grip wasn't any thicker at all and it felt so good because it was like my 17 except with less curve in the back strap due to the "slim frame" option.
I'm not in the market for a hi-cap .45 right now, but I will be within the next year. I was going to pick up a H&K USP.45 just to keep an H&K around since I have my P2000sk up for sale right now. The only thing is I am now dedicating myself to the Glock platform for concealed carry (g26) and for when I start competitive shooting (g35) after my wedding next week - one of many things I will be able to start doing for myself after all the chaos in my life blows over (graduating college, getting new job, moving twice, wedding next week..). Anyways, I'm thinking maybe I should stick to the Glock platform once I do decide to pick up a nice hi-cap .45. It's not like I'm against owning other guns, but the Glock is a good bit cheaper when bought new and I'd have to change sights and get a holster as well.
The width of the grip is a major factor for me though. Anyone out there care to comment on their experiences or post some pictures demonstrating the width of the Glock 21/20 compared against a 9mm/.40 Glock or even a H&K USP.45? Any input on the subject would be helpful at this point.
Thanks!
I happened to stop at a new Gander Mountain store that opened up here recently, and I was checking out their selection of Glocks when I noticed something interesting. The grip width of the 10mm/.45acp models did not appear any thicker (from side to side) than the 9mm/.40 models. I was always under the impression that it wasn't just the slide that was fatter, but the grip was thicker too. However, today I noticed that the slides of the larger caliber guns were actually fatter and basically flush with the width of the grip, while the 9mm and .40 models have a slide that is thinner than the grip by a good 1/16" on each side. Other than that, the grips appear to be the same width. If the larger caliber guns have a thicker grip, it must not be by much. I wish I got to compare them for myself today, but I didn't ask to see any of the 10mm's or .45's because I already checked out a g35 and they were pretty busy with other customers. Just didn't want to be a pain I guess considering I wasn't going to buy anything.
The reason I'm asking is because I held a 21sf a few weeks ago and it felt amazing in my hand. I told myself it wouldn't work for me because I already liked the feel of my g17 and I didn't want to get used to a thicker grip. Now I'm thinking maybe the grip wasn't any thicker at all and it felt so good because it was like my 17 except with less curve in the back strap due to the "slim frame" option.
I'm not in the market for a hi-cap .45 right now, but I will be within the next year. I was going to pick up a H&K USP.45 just to keep an H&K around since I have my P2000sk up for sale right now. The only thing is I am now dedicating myself to the Glock platform for concealed carry (g26) and for when I start competitive shooting (g35) after my wedding next week - one of many things I will be able to start doing for myself after all the chaos in my life blows over (graduating college, getting new job, moving twice, wedding next week..). Anyways, I'm thinking maybe I should stick to the Glock platform once I do decide to pick up a nice hi-cap .45. It's not like I'm against owning other guns, but the Glock is a good bit cheaper when bought new and I'd have to change sights and get a holster as well.
The width of the grip is a major factor for me though. Anyone out there care to comment on their experiences or post some pictures demonstrating the width of the Glock 21/20 compared against a 9mm/.40 Glock or even a H&K USP.45? Any input on the subject would be helpful at this point.
Thanks!
Last edited: