Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Are there any candidates running where you live that you're happy to vote for?

Discussion in 'Activism Discussion and Planning' started by Jrob24, Jul 12, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Jrob24

    Jrob24 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    434
    Location:
    taxachusetts
    In MA right now all 10 congressional seats are held by anti-gun democrats. I think due to Scott Browns senate victory several of those incumbents will have challengers this year.

    I met a pro-gun, pro-constitution candidate named Tom Weaver. He impressed me enough that I'm volunteering for his campaign to get the republican 5th district nomination in September.
    http://www.tomweaverforcongress.com/

    Are there any new or old candidates that you're eager to vote for?
     
  2. rm23

    rm23 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    282
    Location:
    I hate NY... so I moved to Texas!
    Yes! Chris Gibson is a retired Army Ranger who is running for the 20th district in upstate NY.

     
  3. cbrgator

    cbrgator Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2008
    Messages:
    2,525
    Nope. But I never find a good candidate because my politics are all over the place. I'm more inclined to vote for the pro-gunner but sometimes they have glaring deficiencies elsewhere that can outweigh their 2A viewpoint.

    Plus, my local congresswoman, who is rabidly anti-gun, has a stranglehold on the district and is not going anywhere. I have 0 intention of voting for her but it won't matter.
     
  4. swiftak

    swiftak Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2008
    Messages:
    630
    Location:
    New Hampshire woods
    Kelly Ayotte for U.S. Senate in NH.
     
  5. hso

    hso Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    48,571
    Location:
    0 hrs east of TN
    Activism is supposed to be for plans in support of RKBA that other members can put to use. Those plans have to go beyond simple "vote" questions. I'll move this to Activism Discussion in hopes that a plan of action can be developed between the members, but please keep in mind that divisive "polyticks" will get the thread closed.

    Considering that NRA-ILA and GOA and almost every other politically active organization publishes grades/scores on issues (heck, just take the Brady Campaign's scores and reverse them) it's should be pretty easy to find out what the pro and anti 2A politicians are. If the election is local enough to be difficult to find you can call the local Friends of the NRA in town an they should be able to point you to the pro-2A candidate.

    http://thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=387671
     
    Last edited: Jul 27, 2010
  6. bskillet

    bskillet Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2010
    Messages:
    42
    Bill Brady for Governor here in Illinois. Pro 2A, supports legalizing CCW.
     
  7. Shytheed Dumas

    Shytheed Dumas Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2008
    Messages:
    220
    Location:
    Louisville, KY
    Pro 2nd Amendment Todd Lally for 3rd congressional disrtict in Kentucky to replace incumbant john yarmuth who once called for repeal of the 2nd Amendment.
     
  8. Jrob24

    Jrob24 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    434
    Location:
    taxachusetts
    I just looked up yarmuth. I can't believe someone so liberal could get elected in kentucky.
     
  9. 230therapy

    230therapy Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2008
    Messages:
    764
    Location:
    Virginia
    What kind of question is that? Of course not! They're all goofs and dweebs without a clue.

    I would much rather prefer to vote for Tiger Woods than any politician. That way, nothing will get done and his golf game will improve.

    The less that Congress does, the higher the odds they're not going to steal my property and force me to participate in stupid schemes such as sex education for 4 year olds.
     
  10. oneounceload

    oneounceload member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2008
    Messages:
    15,710
    Location:
    Hot and Humid FL
    I'm voting AGAINST ANY incumbent, regardless of party affiliation - there's a LOT more things to take care of in this country beside just gun ownership. Blind party voting is what got the country INTO this mess - it's time to look at each candidate and go accordingly - starting with a clean slate at every level - city, county, state, and Federal
     
  11. Guns and more

    Guns and more member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2008
    Messages:
    1,929
    Yes.
    Anyone who isn't an incumbent. I'm not a one issue voter, be it gun rights, abortion, gay marriage, or taxes. Anyone who is does a disservice to the country. Right now, we need to clean house.
     
  12. Jrob24

    Jrob24 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    434
    Location:
    taxachusetts
  13. Balrog

    Balrog Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2008
    Messages:
    2,170
    The "vote against the incumbent without thinking" is one of the worst ideas I have ever heard.

    Why would you want to replace a bad incumbent with a worse newcomer?
     
  14. tack

    tack Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2008
    Messages:
    46
    Location:
    Southern Kalifonia
    facts of life

    It is not done without thought, Balrog, anymore than it is thoughtless to support an incumbent. You usually won't replace bad with worse. The incumbent had a chance to excel. They either demonstrate their excellence or need to be replaced ASAP. We have many examples where mediocrity sold itself to special interests to remain in power.:fire:

    Then again, Balrog, perhaps you like the way things are today. :uhoh:

    To each his own.
     
  15. hso

    hso Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    48,571
    Location:
    0 hrs east of TN
    Balrog's point is that it doesn't make sense to vote against a pro-2A champion just because they're an incumbent. There are very real champions of our cause in Congress that are the reason that surplus brass is available or a new AWB isn't currently in place. A "throw all incumbents out" philosophy is not selective. It doesn't invite critical examination of the pros or cons of the people running for that seat of power. It may make for an interesting catch phrase, but it makes no more sense than throwing out all your screw drivers just because half of them don't work properly.

    The reasonable thing to do is look at the voting record of your incumbents and determine if they have represented you well or not and whether they've actually worked to push, not just passively support, the most important legislation you want in place and if they've worked to remove pointless or destructive legislation you do want regulating your life.

    Carry out Jefferson's dream of an informed engaged citizenry selecting legislators to carry out the will of the people.
     
    Last edited: Jul 27, 2010
  16. cpuckett812

    cpuckett812 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2010
    Messages:
    59
    My town is covered with signs to vote for a guy named Rick Hole, who Im sure had a nickname or two in school. Beside his campaign signs are ones to get you to vote for Dick Norm. I mean, Im not sure if Im in the twilight zone or porkys movie , but its pretty "hard" to get excited about candidates with names like that.
     
  17. LHRGunslinger

    LHRGunslinger Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2010
    Messages:
    660
    Location:
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    Politicians = scum of the earth.
     
  18. CoRoMo

    CoRoMo Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2007
    Messages:
    8,949
    Location:
    Californicated Colorado
    Colorado Republicans are trying their best to come up with a brand new way to lose an election, but instead, they've fallen back on the old playbook of a third-party candidate to split the GOP vote. While a GOP win was all but locked up, this will hand the governor's office over to yet another anti-2A politician.

    Pity, we only had one shot of getting a pro-gun governor back in the mansion, but now we're going to end up with one of Bloomberg's boys who is openly anti-gun. Ritter dabbled in a bit of gun control, while he was busy embarrassing himself during his one term, but Hickenlooper is going to redefine the term 'control'.
     
  19. CTPhil

    CTPhil Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    281
    Location:
    NW Connecticut
    I've never voted happily. I'm still waiting for any candidate who will put the people first.
     
  20. hso

    hso Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    48,571
    Location:
    0 hrs east of TN
    Negativism doesn't get any traction here in Activism. Either come up with good ideas to affect positive change or expect to be left out of the planning.
     
  21. elcabob

    elcabob Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2009
    Messages:
    6
    Dr. Tom Coburn
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page