"armed and dangerous" ???

[David]

It's funny -- if you go the the FBI's website and look up the most wanted criminals and the most wanted terrorists -- you will usually see the term "use caution -- may be armed and dangerous".

However, in all the government homeland security info I have seen to date, they never even mention the word FIREARMS in reference to one's self-defense.

If all these "dirt bag" criminals and evil terrorists are likely "armed and dangerous," does it not may sense that us, the "good guys and gals," should be "armed and safe"?

:banghead: :banghead: :banghead:

Just my 2 cents...

 

[Hardtarget]

Maybe to their way of thinking, anyone that is armed is dangerous. "They" want to be the only ones armed...so we wre put into the position of fearing "them"
Mark.

 

[Standing Wolf]

I believe the F., the B., and the I. are doing as much as possible to further leftist extremist hoplophobia.

 

[cool45auto]

My bad. I thought this was a review of that old John Candy movie!

 

[Pendragon]

Dangerous is almost meaningless as a word these days.

I am unarmed and still dangerous. I am a LOT bigger than about 99.9% of the people I come across.

Is something dangerous because it has the capacity to harm, or the intent to harm? Perhaps a combination?

 

[blades67]

They have to justify their budget somehow.