Armed citizenry, unarmed police in Alaska

Status
Not open for further replies.

RKCheung

Member
Joined
Dec 23, 2002
Messages
365
Location
PRK
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationw...7oct07,1,4989181.story?coll=la-home-headlines

LA Times - Stop -- or We'll Shout

In Hooper Bay, Alaska, police are the only ones who can't get their hands on a gun. Elders are intent on preserving village custom.

14552327.jpg

'Like a bear with no teeth'
(Al Grillo / AP)

October 7, 2004

Stop -- or We'll Shout

By Tomas Alex Tizon, Times Staff Writer

HOOPER BAY, Alaska — This Eskimo village sits on the edge of the continent, part shantytown, part suburb, part Wild West. One can't go farther west without stepping into the Bering Sea — and just beyond, onto the frosty eastern tip of Siberia.

No roads lead to Hooper Bay, which is why the modern world has taken its time coming here, and then only in spots. Clusters of plywood shacks stand a short distance from subdivisions of lookalike modular homes. There's no running water, but lots of VCRs and satellite dishes, and computers hooked up to the Internet.

One of the more curious aspects of life here has to do with firearms. Every household has an assortment of rifles and shotguns. When people are hungry, they go out and shoot something, like a walrus in the surf.

Every adult has legal access to guns — except the police.

The elders won't allow it.

The policy — some would call it an edict — isn't written anywhere in the town's municipal code. It has simply been spoken by the gray-haired men and women with faces like carved driftwood who believe that armed officers would only create more trouble.

Hooper Bay is the only known municipality in the United States that prohibits officers from carrying firearms. Police Chief James Hoelscher wants to change that. For the past two years, the chief, half-Eskimo, has tried to convince leaders that a growing town of 1,200 needs a modern police department.

"It's been like pedaling backwards going uphill," says Hoelscher, 28. He has a deep voice and friendly dark eyes that can turn intimidating in an instant. "They [town leaders] think we're still in the days of dog sleds and harpoons."

The debate ebbs and flows in town meetings and wherever else it happens to come up, like the lobby of the post office or the checkout line at the grocery store. It is a passionate, disjointed conflict that signals the larger phenomenon of a traditional people facing the pressures of the modern world, the old confronted by the new.

The two sides are divided according to how they view their community. Those in favor of arming the nine police officers tend to see Hooper Bay as an American town; those against view it as an Eskimo village.

"There are many ways to deal with dangerous situations," says City Administrator Raphael Murran. "If the police had guns, somebody might get shot. Somebody might get killed. Then there would be real trouble."

Hoelscher says the village has already become a more dangerous place.

"We're at a point, with the population, when bad things start to happen," Hoelscher says. "I don't really want to die to prove the point."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hooper Bay has been able to hold on to many of its old ways because of its remoteness. The nearest large city, Anchorage, is more than 500 miles away. The town lies on a massive knob of land called the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta, where Alaska's two largest rivers run into the Bering Sea.

From the air, the surface of the delta, which is roughly the size of Utah, looks like a lime-green sponge: flat, endless, grass-covered tundra pockmarked by hundreds of thousands of ponds, lakes and streams.

It is the Alaskan bush at its most remote, and to outsiders, its most inhospitable. Temperatures range from minus 80 degrees in the winter to a humid, mosquito-infested 80 in the summer.

Hooper Bay is the largest of about 50 Eskimo villages in the delta. The only way to get here is by bush plane or boat, and during the winters, by snowmobile, when the delta becomes an ice field.

The town was incorporated in 1965, the same year it got electricity. A sewer system is scheduled to be finished by the end of the decade, if funding comes through.

Local people are drawn to Hooper Bay by jobs and families, and the population has grown by about 50 a year in recent times, Hoelscher says.

More than 40% of residents live below the poverty level, and hundreds receive public assistance. Most of those not employed in government or construction get by on fishing, hunting and gathering.

About 98% of residents are Yupik Eskimo, and many share family lineages. Hoelscher says he is related, by blood or marriage, to one-third of the village. He has had the displeasure of arresting several relatives, including first cousins.

Alcohol is the bane of his department. Hooper Bay, legally, has been dry since 1983. An underground economy has thrived ever since, with bootleggers making home brew and smuggling in a steady supply from the outside.

In a typical year, the department will handle about 40 gun-related incidents, and dozens more involving other weapons. The majority of those incidents involve suspects who are drunk or high.

Hoelscher recalls an incident that happened July 14. A local man beat his girlfriend, who went to the police. Before officers could respond, the man, inebriated, called the department on a VHF radio. He knew the officers, and they knew him. He was 21 and a convicted felon. He barricaded himself in his house and said he would shoot anyone who came near. He dared officers to come get him.

The officers stayed put. They now cite the incident as an example of the inability to do their jobs because of a simple lack of weaponry. "Like a bear with no teeth," as one resident described the department. Had the officers been armed, they would have had more options, including, but not necessarily, confronting the man. Or so the argument goes.

Town leaders, however, use the rest of the story to support their view. The morning after the incident, officers went to the man's house and arrested him in his sleep. The officers found four loaded rifles and shotguns on the floor around his bed. What could have been a deadly confrontation, town leaders point out, ended peacefully.

Officer Dan Decker says that in his five years as an officer, he has been shot at four times, once when a man went on a shooting rampage in the middle of town. The man even shot at the police building. Officers ran, hid for cover and waited until an armed state trooper arrived to arrest the gunman.

The nearest troopers are based in Bethel, more than 150 miles southeast. It takes at least two hours by plane for troopers to arrive in Hooper Bay. With fog, it could take days.

"We've responded to calls in the villages where there are 20 long rifles in the house," says Sgt. Perry Barr, the trooper who flew here the day of the rampage.

In its 45-year history as a state, Alaska has had 42 officers killed in the line of duty, many of them in the bush, most by gunshot.

"Everyone out there has guns. It's odd to me that they won't let the officers have them," Barr says. "I tell you this: I don't ever want to go on a call where an officer has been killed because he couldn't protect himself."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In a ramshackle house on the edge of town, elder Joe Bell, sitting like a smiling brown statue in a flannel shirt, explains the town's refusal to arm their officers: "The elders say 'no,' " Bell says. No further explanation is offered or deemed necessary. An elected council administers city business, but when it comes to the most important issues, the elders have the last say.

Generally, elders are people in their 60s and 70s, although the title refers more to people who've lived longer than everyone else around. Many elders don't know their exact ages.

Like Bell, some elders speak a little English; many don't. Or won't. Some are old enough to recall the days when the Eskimos of the delta were nomadic.

Until the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the Native people lived in extended family groups that followed the fish and game during spring and summer, and returned to fixed encampments during winter.

Most of the communities became permanent villages within the past 50 to 100 years, as clans were forced by the government to settle in one place. The 1890 census found 138 people living in 14 sod houses in what is now Hooper Bay. Hooper was the last name of a naval captain who claimed a nearby island for the United States.

"These micro-urban environments are artificial creations, and the people are still trying to figure out how to live together in this situation," says Darryl Wood, an associate professor at the University of Alaska's Justice Center in Anchorage. Wood has done extensive studies on law enforcement problems in Native villages.

Wood says Hooper Bay is evolving from a loose-knit village to something closer to a modern American town, and that it is "very wise" of the community to carefully deliberate something as potentially divisive as armed police.

Traditional Eskimo communities had no equivalents to police officers, says anthropologist Mary Pete, a Yupik Native who lives in Bethel. Pete said conflicts and disagreements were settled within family clans, usually by the elders or by the most influential couple in the group.

Someone who committed a transgression, such as stealing food, would be subjected to rituals in which clan members would ridicule him in song. Humiliation was an effective punishment in a culture that regarded saving face as paramount, Pete says.

More serious transgressors could be ostracized. Life was a constant struggle on the delta; clan members depended on each other to survive. A person who was ostracized would be left on his own, which could mean death from any number of causes, such as starvation.

The concept of outsiders enforcing societal laws — as when a state trooper flies into a village to make an arrest — was viewed with suspicion, even resentment. This is reflected in the Yupik words for "police officer." One word, tegufta, translates to "the person who takes you away." Another word, qillerqista, means "the person who ties you up."

Many Yupik Eskimos believe it's bad enough to be forced to tolerate the occasional tegufta. Having armed officers in town, says teacher and lifelong resident Maryann Nukusuk, would be tantamount to "giving a gun to one family member and telling him to keep watch over other family members."

"It's too intimate, too interrelated here," Nukusuk says.

If an officer were to shoot or kill someone, Nukusuk and other residents say, that officer could become a victim of another Eskimo custom: revenge killing by other family members. But what if an officer were killed? "It's the job they chose," she says.

Nukusuk acknowledges that violence happens in town, but she says the true Yupik way is to do everything possible to keep the peace, even if it means an unarmed police officer negotiating for "hours and hours and hours" to defuse a confrontation.

Back at his house, elder Bell concedes that times are changing, and that the delta is changing along with them. Just last spring, on May 31, three teenagers went on a four-hour shooting spree in the tiny Eskimo village of Stebbins, about 180 miles northeast of here, which by delta standards qualifies as next door.

Hooper Bay was abuzz for days with the news. Comments were made to the effect that the outside world was on the town's doorstep.

Bell, reflecting on the incident for a few moments, says Chief Hoelscher will probably get his way, and that the town will most likely have armed police.

"Someday," Bell says, smiling. "When all the elders are gone."
 
Scary

The part of that story that is so shocking is how many Troopers the State of Alaska has lost over the years!!

I think what the Elders of that villiage need to realize is with the introduction of Alchohol and drugs into their society their best best is to have some armed police around.
 
The part of that story that is so shocking is how many Troopers the State of Alaska has lost over the years!!

The quote was, "In its 45-year history as a state, Alaska has had 42 officers killed in the line of duty, many of them in the bush, most by gunshot."

What's scary about that? The largest state in the union (by far) and they have less than one police officer a year killed? (And only "most of them" by gunfire.) I would say that is a low number rather than a large one.

I think what the Elders of that villiage need to realize is with the introduction of Alchohol and drugs into their society their best best is to have some armed police around.

I disagree. What's that old saying..."to a man with a hammer, everything looks like a nail?" That's pretty well describes the "state of the art" in law enforcement. Everybody wants to turn to force at a rapid rate. At the slightest sign of a gun on a civilian, the LEO's start drawing their guns and pointing them at the citizens. I'm VERY uncomfortable with where we are now and it is just getting worse.

You read the article about how the barricade situation was handled? What was wrong with that? If the "Waco incident" had been handled like that a bunch of people would still be alive. LEO's need to try to think of solutions that don't involve force. But that is an alien concept to many of them. "We've got guns. Let's break down the door!"

The citizens are supposed to come first then the officers. But the LEO's always want to talk about "officer safety." Guess what buddy? Your safety comes after the safety of the citizens you are supposed to "protect and serve." Pointing guns at people becomes entirely too much "the norm." (I would think the recent posting here of the ND by the female officer would make people realize how dangerous such actions really are.) I would FAR prefer that police were unarmed in the majority of cases. They have their vehicles and all their radios. They can always call for help if something bad actually happens.

What has evolved here in the US is the worst possible outcome. The bad guys know the cops are armed and trained to "go to their guns" at an early point in a conflict. Got to "keep ahead of the force escalation." So the bad guys are MORE likely to just shoot an LEO right at the beginning of an encouter. Cops are LESS safe not MORE.

The old standard in the US was supposed to be that the citizens were better armed than the average cop. He walked around with a six shot revolver and knew everybody in the town. The citizens owned rifles and auto pistols but they rarely considered using them on their local town cop. IF things escalated because of outsiders, the cops could then call out more officers and arm them with rifles and shotguns. Somehow we have now gotten to the point where the police want to routinely carry arms that civilians aren't even allowed to own.

It's a bad situation. Maybe you won't really realize just how bad until YOU are the one lying face down in the gravel 100 yards from your house. For daring to walk down a deserted dirt road with a covered holster on your belt. Do we really want all of our LEO's acting like they are on an episode of COPS? http://www.falfiles.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=80795

Gregg
 
AK is the largest state, but has one of the smallest populations (abt 650,000); an average of almost one state trooper per year is very high. Georgia has lost 24 since 1940, and our population is roughly 13x greater.
 
I agree with tulsamal. There seem to be plenty of weapons around, should the need arise for their use. These folks got by for a LONG time without police at all.....
 
having difficulty finding the data, but this link shows figures quite different:

http://home1.gte.net/vzn05sxc/lefacts.htm

as does this one:

http://www.turnerpublishing.com/detail.aspx?ID=566


the data i was looking for chronicled the deaths of law enforcement officers, and more than 1/3 were from vehicle/plane/helicopter accidents.

tragedies nonetheless, but i think the "42 deaths in 45 years" number was massaged just a little bit.

funny the latimes just now got this story. we posted about it when it was local news a long time ago. last year?
 
Good article, actually. It's a part of the US most outside Alaska don't even know exists. I remember my first trip out there, and being shocked at the fact that Yupik is still the main language.

A few points of clarification, though. THESE OFFICERS ARE NOT TROOPERS! Alaska troopers are well armed. These folks are Village Public Safety Officers. They are locals with much more limited training. Arming them would give rise to problems since they don't have the training to go storming in on armed suspects. The "thin blue line" thinking exhibited by many posters in this thread has limited application in this state and NO application in the bush. Outside Anchorage there is no blue line. There's your rifle and your neighbor's rifle, that's it.

Also, re. the statistic--that's including all LEO's and including those killed in car accidents and other tragedies in the line of duty. Alaska's highways are far, far more lethal than her armed citizens.
 
Actually Cos,

IIRC They actually have "police", not just VPSO's. That's why it is an issue at all.

Course I read the ADN article a year ago, like Spiff.
 
This should be the policy everywhere :p

If an (unarmed) peace officer wants to arrest somebody, then he(she) just calls upon one or more private citizens (all armed, of course) to help him (her).

It would sorta put a damper on frivolous (victimless) arrests ... "You want us to help you arrest him for WHAT ????"

:neener:

(yeah, I am joking ... well, somewhat anyway ...)
 
Sorry folks, I didn't see that thread last year, but I was in Iraq at the time, so don't be so hard on me. :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top