Australia's failed gun control plan - now Sword control

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rob62

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
621
Location
Georgia, USA
This is truly one of the funniest things I've read in a long time. It almost seems to be a joke but unfortunatly true. There is no doubt that kitchen knifes will be next.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=38896

Gun control in Australia has given way to sword control as police prepare to enforce a new law meant to curb modern-day swashbuckling.

According to a report in the Melbourne Herald Sun, the new statute slaps owners of swords who don't have a permit with up to six months in jail and fines of up to $12,000.

Police Minister Andre Haermeyer told the paper the law will help cops deal with youngsters who are arming themselves with swords.

"For most people running around the street carrying swords there is absolutely no reason for them to be carrying those weapons," he is quoted as saying.

Under the law, set to go into effect next month, those owning swords now would have to surrender their weapons to authorities, sell them to a licensed dealer or apply for specific approval to possess them.

Sword collectors will have to keep the items under lock and key and have a burglar alarm.

According to the report, a 21-year-old man had his hand severed by a samurai sword in a confrontation between 40 men last winter, and a 19-year-old was hacked to death in 2002 by a mob using swords.

The police minister stressed those owning swords for legitimate reasons can apply for exemptions.

"Legitimate sword owners understand the importance of ensuring that their swords do not fall into the wrong hands," he told the Sun. "The vast majority of the community would say, 'Look, there's no place for people just being able to go out there and buy these things and carry them around the street.'"

The Victoria government is also looking at bans on some other weapons, such as crossbows.


Regards,
Rob
 
In ten years, will they make everyone go out in public wearing padded mittens? Will you need a permit to make a fist or pick up a hammer?
 
Brave New World, and 1984 isn't suppose to be the instruction manual :cuss: :cuss: :cuss:

Thought police... Excuse me why I go find my tin foil hat...:scrutiny: :uhoh: :barf:
 
Do people seriously buy swords for everyday street carry in AU?

"...a new law meant to curb modern-day swashbuckling"???

SWASHBUCKLING? Am I actually intended to believe that Australia is just one big renfest now, with everyone wearing a sword as they go about their daily business? Arrrgh, matey!

I always thought politicians everywhere had a fear of being laughed at. Evidently not.

ETA: If this caught on with the criminal element in the US, would it be referred to on the street as "Swizash-mo' funkin bucklin"?
 
Last edited:
Rebellious subjects, enemies to peace,
Profaners of this neighbour-stained steel,--
Will they not hear? What, ho! you men, you beasts,
That quench the fire of your pernicious rage
With purple fountains issuing from your veins,
On pain of torture, from those bloody hands
Throw your mistemper'd weapons to the ground...
 
Wow. Sounds like a step towards sword-control from 16th century feudal Japan. I'm not a Japanese historian, but how well did that work out?
 
Sheesh. While they're at it they need to round up and burn any old Errol Flynn movies that might be lying around................:rolleyes:
 
According to the report, a 21-year-old man had his hand severed by a samurai sword in a confrontation between 40 men last winter, and a 19-year-old was hacked to death in 2002 by a mob using swords.
Sounds like the 21-year-old and the 19-year-old should have been carrying guns. Hacked to death by a mob? Where were the police? :rolleyes:
 
AHHHHHHH!!

My head hurts.

And I havent even done this yet.

:banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:
 
The following extract is from the newsletter of a pro gun politician here in Australia. FWIW.


'PROHIBITED WEAPONS SCHEDULE
The Review of the Prohibited Weapons Schedule is underway. This happens
every five years, and decides what changes need to be made to the Schedule
of Weapons which are legally prohibited.

The main cause of concern this time around, seems to stem from reports that
the Minister might add swords, machetes, and other cutting and stabbing
instruments to the Schedule. The Minister might do that only if the
officers conducting the review recommend it. It should be understood that
the Minister himself does not conduct the Review personally, but has it done
by officers of the Ministry for Police and his Ministerial office.

I had a great deal of correspondence from collectors, and others who have
swords of various types, and I advised them to make submissions before they
closed on May 15.

In my own submission, I pointed out the rarity of serious offences with a
sword as the weapon, and that it would be very difficult to arrive at a
sensible definition of “swordâ€. For example, I have a purely decorative
Samurai sword, with a flat edge instead of a sharpened blade, and a blunt
point, which could not be used for stabbing. Is this, technically, really a
sword, as such?

The feeling coming through to me is that there is not a great deal of
enthusiasm for such a prohibition amongst senior government people. It was
included in the Review only because Victoria has taken action to limit
ownership of swords. But the difficulty of definition, and the logistic
nightmare of setting up a licensing and registration system, through a
Firearms Registry which is already disastrously overloaded, is being brought
home firmly.'
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top