Back to considering a cheap Heritage revolver.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Some folks just cannot seem to by the Price is the total indicator of quality.
Anybody who is familiar at all with guns can examine a Heritage and a Ruger and determine which is the better gun. Has nothing do to with the price tag and everything to do with the build quality of the guns in question. Sorry but to simply discount the other side as being blinded by price tag is foolish. Funny how we can talk all day about how FA's are better than Rugers without issue. Imply that Heritage guns are cheap and Rugers are better and their protagonists come out of the woodwork frothing at the mouth.
 
I've been down the cheap road as well. Never again. Part of the pleasure of gun ownership is the pride and feel of a quality gun irrespective of how it shoots. Generally speaking, the warranty of a quality gun is worth the extra as well.
 
Okay guys, . . . . here's the final decision. I'm just going to go with a blued Ruger Single Ten [new]. I can get one for $450 shipped and FFL charge. How is that?
 
Well when it comes to firearms, like many other products, there is a price floor that one has to meet for well made functional firearms of good enough quality to use heavily. Fortunately that price floor is relatively low all things considered. For a rimfire revolver in a single action there are not a lot of choices, especially if you want adjustable sights, and a steel frame that is made from gun quality steel as well as other quality internal parts.

That pretty much leaves the price floor revolver as the Ruger Single Six, which is not really a bad thing. For the money you are getting a pretty nice little gun, and honestly they are not a lot of money. You also get a "real" gun that will work, and keep working, in fact they will work so well you will take for granted the fact that it will go bang and function properly all the time. Plus given the much higher materials quality it will still be around for your children's children to enjoy.

My father has been down the cheap gun road exactly once, incidentally with a cheap nasty little .22LR single action revolver made by a company called FIE. After about 6 months of regular weekly use the little gun was no longer functional, I don't remember why since I was only 10 years old at the time. I do remember shooting it a bit though not that my skill level at 10 years of age allowed me to tell you much. I can relate the end result, that being my father getting rid of the nasty little paper weight and buying a Ruger Single Six convertible. That little gun is still going strong 23 years later, and at the time it was a real revelation; even a 10 year old could tell it was much more well made, smoother to operate, better finished, prettier, it even sounded better being cocked making the nice sounds of a solid well fit action. Oh and it shot a ton better too.

As CraigC pointed out we may argue a lot about Rugers vs other more expensive guns, and we do no doubt. The reason being that for the money Ruger revolvers are often the yardstick that other revolvers are measured against. Ruger revolvers earned that reputation by being damn good guns that work at a more than fair price. Are there better guns than a Ruger? Sure, but in many cases they cost a lot more. I'll be the first to admit that the extra cost may or may not be worth it over a Ruger, and I own a Freedom Arms that cost several multiples the cost of a Super Blackhawk. For me it was worth it, but the price paid to gain that extra strength, precision, and finish was seriously hefty.
 
Anybody who is familiar at all with guns can examine a Heritage and a Ruger and determine which is the better gun. Has nothing do to with the price tag and everything to do with the build quality of the guns in question. Sorry but to simply discount the other side as being blinded by price tag is foolish. Funny how we can talk all day about how FA's are better than Rugers without issue. Imply that Heritage guns are cheap and Rugers are better and their protagonists come out of the woodwork frothing at the mouth

Sir! I did not come out of the woodwork, nor am I frothing at the mouth, if perchance you are implying the same I take that as an insult to my intelligence and integrity. Where did I say that the RR was the better firearm in the same price range, where?

For the difference in price the RR is a decent piece. I purchased mine for $119.99 at Big R on sale New, the lowest price for a New Ruger I could find on Gun Broker at a Buy it Now was $375, that 3 times as much. Yes the Ruger is higher in finish and no doubt will last longer, it sure as Heck better at 3 times the price. And NO we're not talking used guns here we're talking NEW.

Will the RR fit my needs and wants for now? YES, and for a whopping $119.00 bucks. The rest of the bucks stay in the bank.

Craig watch the mouth frothing. I see your remarks in all your threads about less expensive handguns. It gets a little tiresome.
 
Okay guys, . . . . here's the final decision. I'm just going to go with a blued Ruger Single Ten [new]. I can get one for $450 shipped and FFL charge. How is that?

You made the choice of the better of the two, however your orginal post stated "cheap" which the Ruger is not. Better? Yes Cheap? No
 
Sorry that I wasn't more clear about the title. I wasn't worried much about the price, but was only considering it because of the birds head, . . . and the "cheap" was in reference to [yes] price, but also materials used in the Heritage, . . . but not to say it wasn't good for its price.

But after due consideration, and because it is the case that the blue of a Ruger would look much better, I went with the Ruger Single Ten. Price is a bit higher than I would care to go with a .22lr shooter, but it should last for years to come and if I take care of it, may be worth as much or more in the future. So, I am getting:

pix822171246.gif
 
You'll be happy with that Ruger, they are great little guns. You might also reevaluate your view on what you should spend on a .22LR firearm. Frankly you might as well get the best rimfire pistol, revolver, or rifle you can afford. The reason is that invariably you will end up shooting your .22LR more than just about any other guns you have, they are cheap to shoot, they don't beat you up, and they are good training. So if you are going to be shooting it a lot, don't skimp, get something serviceable and capable. Your training on the .22LR will translate directly to your other larger guns, so a .22LR should not only be a useful well made gun but an understudy for your bigger guns.
 
Well, there is truth to your post, Coal. Yes, .22lr is a round that I will be shooting more than any other, so yeah, . . . I think I made the right decision. :)
 
Being as you had the funds to spend and plan on years of shooting this revolver you more than likely have made the correct choice for YOU. Not everyone fits into the slice of pie you fit into.

In my situtation, not many years left to enjoy this sport, no one to leave any of my collection to. The Rough Rider will fit into my collection of way over 200 firearms, and will fit right alongside my Ruger single six, S & W Md. 17, H & R's 999, H & R 949, NEF R92, H & R's 22 special's, I could go on & on and also enclude all the .22 rimfire auto's, but there's no point in it.

So in the end, you'll be happy with your choice, as I am so far with mine. To the others not everyone needs to always spend the big bucks, actually I already have. Then I suppose I know very little about firearms or collecting them over 50 plus years as some have implyed here.
 
Last edited:
jcwit, I may get a Heritage birds head at some point in the future. I'm not opposed to it. For THIS gun, I think the Ruger was the best choice [yes] for me.
 
35Rem, thanks for the link. I have seen this, but it seems to be out of stock. Plus, I would rather have it in kit form with all the screws and necessary items to make it work.

Another frame change would be if someone made a Bisley handle and added in the parts, including a Bisley style hammer, . . . and made it for the Single Six/Ten. I REALLY like the feel of the Bisley handle. . . . . just like the looks of the Birds Head.

Also would prefer on with a blued frame.
 
Last edited:
I personally don't buy "the most expensive". Many times, there is a diminishing return for what you get. Also, items may be more expensive due to the name with nothing really extraordinary to show over a lower priced option.

For THIS thread, however, I think that the Ruger [that I have coming my way] is definitely worth the extra $125 for the materials alone. Again, I MAY [at some point] purchase a Heritage Birds Head in the future. For now, I thought it was the more wise way to go, in case I DON'T get another .22lr revolver.

I'm actually excited about it and am glad I went with the blue over the stainless steel. A bit more "old fashion". And I have always had a thing for fluteless cylinders. Also, being that this one has a 4.6" barrel, I like that the ejector section is the same length as the barrel [as compared to the 5.5" barrels that protrude past it]. All in all, I think I made the right choice. Now I just need to go out and shoot it when it comes in.
 
The Single Ten would be easily converted to a Bisley. The frame and trigger are the same as the centerfires. Only the hammer is different. They're not too difficult or expensive to procure, think I have a couple spares myself. Frames come in the rough and require quite a bit of filing and polishing for proper fitment. Hammers and triggers are finished, ready to drop in.
 
Hmmmm. . . . maybe just getting the Bisley hammer then and calling it good. Definitely not set up to work up a frame in the rough.
 
I humbly suggest spending the money you would expend on a different grip frame and hammer, plus other tools; instead on a large supply of good quality ammo and targets! Get out there and shoot, you'll have more fun that way.

Front sight focus, press through the trigger. Repeat. A lot.
 
Okay guys, . . . . here's the final decision. I'm just going to go with a blued Ruger Single Ten [new]. I can get one for $450 shipped and FFL charge. How is that?

I'd say this was a very good move. And I own a Heritage. For only $100 to $125 more, the Single Ten is clearly the better value. One day I'd really like to pick up a 3 screw, fixed sight Single Six. For now though, I'll continue to enjoy my somewhat clunky, but fun and accurate Rough Rider. For sure I won't sell it, even when I do get a Ruger.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top