Baltimore finally acknowledges the obvious!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jmurman

Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2002
Messages
661
Location
MD
They finally post what we have known all along!


Police seek end to chain of killings
City's suspects, victims have similar criminal records, demographics
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Del Quentin Wilber
Sun Staff
Originally published May 25, 2003



When Baltimore recorded its 100th homicide early this month, police officials expressed frustration -- not just with an unexplained surge in deadly violence that puts the city ahead of last year's pace but also with their inability to directly attack the problem.
Police are often stymied, they say, by the very nature of Baltimore's deadly violence, which springs from a culture where victims and killers are frequently part of the same milieu. In many cases, yesterday's suspect becomes tomorrow's victim, making it exceedingly difficult to break the chain of killing.











Under new Commissioner Kevin P. Clark, police are trying to attack the underlying circumstances associated with homicides by harassing drug dealers and those who hang out with them. Police hope that by disrupting the underworld's street life, they can eventually reduce overall violence and killings.

Police are implementing those strategies as the city continues to endure a modest spike in killings. Through Friday, the city had recorded 112 killings, compared with 101 through the same period last year. In 2002, the city tallied 253 homicides, a dip from 256 in 2001 and 261 recorded in 2000, when Baltimore dropped below 300 killings in a year for the first time in a decade.

Police point to many factors that contribute to the stubbornness of the homicide numbers. Many are targeted attacks. The majority are outdoors and at night. The killings are scattered throughout the city. And they are often isolated events.

But in interviews with top police commanders and detectives, authorities usually return to one vexing characteristic about city homicides that stands out above all others -- the victims' backgrounds are often indistinguishable from those of their killers.

"Our murders involve criminals -- whether they are victims or suspects," said Maj. Antonio Williams, commander of the city's homicide unit.

In order to get a better handle on the situation, police launched a study of this year's first 100 homicides.

What they found did not surprise them.

Nearly every suspect -- 42 of 43 -- had a criminal record.

So did 80 percent of the victims.

Typical of many of those killed was Haywood McKinnon, police say.

Recently released from prison after serving time for attempted murder, the 22-year-old was gunned down April 30 on the front steps of an East Baltimore house. Just a few weeks earlier, he had been arrested on drug dealing charges.

Police detectives have few suspects in the case and say they believe McKinnon was killed because he was trying to re-establish drug turf lost while he was behind bars.

John Cooley, 29, was found fatally shot March 13 in West Baltimore. Cooley had a lengthy record of arrests, including a murder charge that was later dropped by prosecutors. Police said they believe Cooley's death was tied to his previous brushes with the law and might have been connected to an earlier killing.

As in many cases, detectives have been frustrated in their investigation of Cooley's death by uncooperative witnesses. One potential witness in that case told a detective that he would not identify a suspect in a photograph, even if his own son's life hung in the balance, police said.

Other victims, such as Tyrone Lewis, put themselves in extremely dangerous circumstances, police say. The 26-year-old -- who had a lengthy record of arrests for a variety of offenses -- was slain March 9 while robbing a drug stash house, police say. Two men have been charged in Lewis' death.


Circles of violence

"These victims are traveling in circles of violence," said Chief Edwin Day of the city's detective division. "They are involved in a culture that begets violence. We have to acknowledge they are traveling in this culture and that comes with risk."

Supporting Day's observation are statistics that indicate many of the city's killings appear to be targeted. With about 80 percent of homicide victims killed by gunfire, just over four in 10 of those were hit in the head and nearly six in 10 were hit multiple times.

"It is very clear that there is an intent behind the shooting," Day said.


Similar profiles

Police also indicate that the profiles of suspects and victims are similar. Of the first 112 homicide victims this year, 100 were men, and 62 were between the ages of 18 and 29. This year, police say, they have identified 66 suspects in 55 killings committed in 2003 and in previous years. Among that group of suspects, 63 are men, and 48 are between the ages of 18 and 34, police said.

Police also say that Baltimore's homicides are scattered throughout the city, which makes it difficult to concentrate resources to prevent them.

This year, the smallest district in geographical size -- the Western -- is leading the city in killings, tallying 27 through Friday. That represents about a quarter of city homicides.

Last year, the Eastern District led the city with 61 killings. Through Friday, the district had recorded 17 slayings, well below the same period in 2002.

Police also say the killings happen in darkness -- 61 people were slain between 8 p.m. and 4 a.m. -- when few credible witnesses can be found with legitimate reasons for being near a homicide scene.

The killings also occur in the open, on street corners where seemingly innocuous confrontations can erupt into gunfire.

About 65 percent of this year's killings and 75 percent of those in 2002 were committed outdoors.

That's one reason police are hopeful that their new crime-fighting strategies of harassing drug dealers who roam the streets will help reduce murders.

"There are no quick fixes or easy answers," said Williams, the commander of the city's homicide unit. "It will take time before we see results."



Copyright © 2003, The Baltimore Sun
 
Recently released from prison after serving time for attempted murder, the 22-year-old was gunned down April 30 on the front steps of an East Baltimore house. Just a few weeks earlier, he had been arrested on drug dealing charges.

didn't the dealing charges violate his parole? why was that guy on the streets in the first place?
 
The state of affairs in Baltimore is sad indeed. It is a darn shame that the bad guys have created such a climate of fear and a disregard for the good things that Baltimore has to offer.

My family came from Baltimore City and I guess I still consider myself a Baltimorean (or is thet Balti-moron, hon?) at heart. However, I find very little reason to venture North of the Anne Arundel County line these days. This is truly a shame as the city has wonderful resources beyond the Disney-esque surreality that is the Inner Harbor.

My wife and I love to go to the symphony, but who wants to walk at night back to their car? We would like to spend time doing research at Enoch Pratt Library, but who wants to run the gauntlet of homeless beggars camped out around the building?

Until the leadership of Baltimore (the city that bleeds......oops, I mean reads) grows a pair and stands up to the special interest groups that allow the continued erosion of the basic tenets of civilized behavior, no one is going to make an effort to put their personal assets into the city. The people who do have money to live in the nicer neighborhoods, pay a disproportionate share of the taxes compared to the services recieved. It's nothing more than a redistribution of wealth so that the fine citizens mentioned in the article below can be subsidised to stand on the corners all day and ply their trade.

Since Maryland is one of the most restrictive states for the purchase of a handgun, one has to ask rhetorically where do these people get guns? Classic illustration that more restrictions on gun laws only take the guns away from the good guys.

:banghead:
 
the victims' backgrounds are often indistinguishable from those of their killers.
Good. They call it thinning the herd. Let these slimeballs continue killing themselves off. Makes no matter to me.

Nearly every suspect -- 42 of 43 -- had a criminal record. So did 80 percent of the victims.
Having less restrictive gun laws would do nothing to curb this murder rate as it would in most situations where the victims were regular law-abiding citizens being preyed upon. However, this just goes to show that bad guys don't follow the rules and will get guns no matter what the law says.

I sincerely doubt they will put 2 and 2 together, especially for our community's benefit.

GT
 
Darwin at work.

Thinning the crowd.

Cleaning off the streets.

I am sure those criminals are saying the police need to protect them better from other criminals... :rolleyes:

If it didn't put other people in danger, the police should just send the address of every criminal to everyother criminal and let them talk their differences out.
 
We need the government to solve this problem.

Let's see, why don't we have them outlaw drugs and then restrict private ownership of firearms.

That should do it.



Oh!!

They've already done that.

Gee, maybe, instead of solving this problem, the government is causing it?


Nah, they wouldn't do that -- (would they?).


The free-market and limited government could never solve a problem like this, could it?



Only bright spot: the cockroaches are doing their own pest-control.


Matis
 
...the victims' backgrounds are often indistinguishable from those of their killers.

(Road sign: Darwin Working Ahead) How is this bad? Unless an innocent gets caught in the wrong place at the wrong time.
This is a self eliminating problem. Evacuate the friendlies, contain the rest inside set boundries, and keep them well supplied with ammo.
 
Since Maryland is one of the most restrictive states for the purchase of a handgun, one has to ask rhetorically where do these people get guns? Classic illustration that more restrictions on gun laws only take the guns away from the good guys.

I just sent Gov Ehrlich a email about the MD Handgun Board. I asked when this is going to change.

A story for you.

At the dealership where I work a fellow that works here, was called the other day. It was an emergency call that someone had broken into his apt. Now, this guy lives right across the line in the City. The neighborhood is questionable to say the least. Well, when he gets to his house, he finds the Balto City Crime Lab at his home. They have entered his house (he lives with his young son and both of them were out of the house). The Police tell him he cannot enter his house. They then tell him he is under arrest. You see, the Police ransacked his house. They went through EVERYTHING. In his bathroom, in a cupboard, not in a medicine cabinet but a towel cabinet, they found two pistols. One was purchase legally and the other was purchased off the street. My guy tells me that he NEEDS a gun for his families protection. I totally believe him. The one purchased off the street was done years ago, before he bought the "legal" piece.

So, they confisgate them both, even though the search was totally illegal. My guys lawyer has him released from jail that night. Forget about the slime that broke into his house....my guy is now the criminal. The case will be thrown out, but you see, Baltimore has this policy...they NEVER give back any firearm!

Now, my guy is out of luck....no weapon to defend himself, and will probably not pass the "back ground check" for future purchases.

Now, let me ask this question. If you were him, and someone came to you and said that they has handguns for sale...would you buy one?

Tough situation to be in for sure.
 
JMurman:

Sounds like a stereotypical Maryland story....the victim of the crime is the one actually arrested and charged......easier that way.

For my part, when I'm going back and forth to the range I always make sure that I carefully observe the speed limit, full stops at stop signs, never go through a yellow light, etc. I don't want any LEO to have an excuse to put the metal bracelets on my wrists. (No offense intended to LEO's out there.....)

Perhaps the city of Baltimore needs a certain level of civil unrest to justify higher levels of funding for law enforcement:confused:
 
I guess they consider it "as the city continues to endure a modest spike in killings" when they need an excuse as to why their oppressive guns laws aren't working to halt crime like they told everyone.
 
Stange, we recently had the first murder in the state in two years. Since we have some of the most lax gun laws in the country, you'd think that we'd be the most dangerous place to live??? :rolleyes:

Funny how people like Michael Moore choose to ignore places like where I live. And instead focus on Canada. :barf:

Morgan Quitno Press, a Lawrence,Kan.-based research and publishing company, has ranked North Dakota as the safest state in the U.S. for the sixth year in a row.

"North Dakota had the nation’s lowest murder rate, the lowest robbery rate, the lowest aggravated assault rate and the lowest burglary rate.â€
 
The "harass the drug dealers" plan may have unintended consequences, bringing more police in the circle of violence... and not usually as the killers, either.
 
ND has lowest crime rate ...

That wouldn't be because BG's don't like anyplace that has ten months of winter every year now would it ??? :)
 
What amazes me is that anybody is amazed to find out that a vastly disproportionate amount of the murders in this country are what police term "NHI" killings, for No Humans Involved.
 
Wondernine

we recently had the first murder in the state in two years.

That's incredible! But come clean now: what was the murder rate??

Lets see - population 726, 1 murder, 2 years ...

:D
 
Nearly every suspect -- 42 of 43 -- had a criminal record. So did 80 percent of the victims.
No surprise. Chicago (aka Gun Owner's Hell aka Daleyville) did a 20-year study of murderers and their victims. It turned out that over 3/4 of the murderers had prior criminal convictions, as did more than 2/3 of the "victims."

The study was largely suppressed, as it included demographics, and certain demographic groups were VERY over-represented relative to their proportion of the population. (Can't say certain things, you know, even if true . . . it's just not politically correct.)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top