Ban the Cell Phones

Status
Not open for further replies.
they could always install cell phone inhibitors which interferes with cell phone devices or signal. could have bad side effects though. their was a plan to do the same thing on airplanes because they found out cell phones could screw with planes instruments. have yet to hear it implemented in single plane though.

the bomb they found on the rail recently was hard wired and not wireless.

doubt it would do any real good. they could take any piece of technology availible and modify to theyre needs. its a cat and mouse game and the mouse has more holes than the cat can guard.
 
Banning cell phones would be a disaster. Talk about bringing the economy to a halt. Jeesh.

I believe that the ban on cell phones, CD players, computers, etc. on planes is hogwash. These appliances do not interfere with aeronautical instruments. It is about control. It is for your own safety. :rolleyes: They ban the use of these items upon take-off and landing where things are most likely to go awry. They do not want notebook computers flying around the plane, nor do they want people to be blasting musuc through headphones or talking on cell phones while you are supposed to be "following crew member instructions." It is about control.
 
I have a buddy with a Cessna 182 and we did a little experiment with the cell phone while airborne - it had NO discernable impace on the avionics (the plane has the latest Garmin GPS/weather stuff), and we had excellent signal strength. In fact the only problem we had was being heard, as the cockpit in a little plane like that is rather loud.

My theroy on why they ban cell hones is a), they want the revenue offa the Skyphones,; and b)' the cellphone 'sees' multiple towers from up high and it really boogers up the network billing. I know we have some commercial pioots and wireless gurus out there, any comments?
 
Wow, it seems terrorists finally figured out that you don't have to be near the bomb to make it explode:D

Honestly, a cell phone ban wouldn't pass the senate or the house. But then again, if its for the children...:scrutiny:
 
From the article:
"But in Britain, the United States and many other countries, it is illegal for civilians to use cell phone blockers. The right to make a call reigns supreme.

Michael Menage, of Global Gadget, said: "In the UK, as in most other nations, they are illegal, because you are interfering with somebody else's right to use a mobile telephone."

***???
Right to use a cell phone?
okayyyy.....
I guess I missed that right.
:rolleyes:
 
Cell phones do not cause a problem with avoinics but the frequency is only approved for ground to ground communications by our friends at the FCC. This is the reason cell phones are not allowed to be used on planes, that and it really will mess up the cell towers. At least this is my understanding of the issue, and as my wife tells me I am often wrong.
 
Jefmad's got it. When you're at high altitude, your signal will go to all the repeaters within range, which bothers the FCC, not (in most cases -- don't know about secret squirrel electronics) the plane's avionics. We generally fly at 1000' or less at work, and use the cellphone all the time. In fact we use a commercially available cable and control that lets us plug the phone directly into a commo jack so we can use the phone through our headsets.

People who do this should inform their signficant others that if they are calling them to talk dirty, they might have an audience. :)
 
Banning cellphones is impossible. The whole point of technology is to make women happy. And this wouldn't. Trust me on that. (Of course this also underscores why technology is ultimately doomed to disappoint.):D
 
We don't need to ban them, just make them "safe" phones by installing a biometric scanner on it. That way, only the person approved to use it can use it and they must be holding it to operate it. Goo way to get rid of some terrorists too I guess.

GT
 
But there are products on the market to stem the use of mobile phones in terrorist attacks.

So these devices can tell what a phone is being used for?


fjolnirsson

Michael Menage, of Global Gadget, said: "In the UK, as in most other nations, they are illegal, because you are interfering with somebody else's right to use a mobile telephone."

***???
Right to use a cell phone?
okayyyy.....
I guess I missed that right.

How about as an extension of the right to free speach / communication?

And the more general right to do what you want as long as you're not restricting other people's freedom?
 
[/ Foxworthy/on/] Well, hell, if free speech is a right, how comes they charge for it each month?[/Foxworthy/off/]:rolleyes:
 
We don't need to ban them, just make them "safe" phones by installing a biometric scanner on it. That way, only the person approved to use it can use it and they must be holding it to operate it.

We also need limits on the battery life and number of calls that can be made! My God, there are "assault batteries" out there that can provide for *dozens* of hours of usage! And chargers that LET YOU NEVER RUN OUT!

And then we have "holsters" to put them in to allow them to be carried concelaed, ready to produce and make indiscriminate calls in the middle of crowded schoolyards. OH GOD WON'T SOMEBODY THINK OF THE CHILDREN???
 
"they could always install cell phone inhibitors which interferes with cell phone devices or signal."

I think someone has slipped me one of those on my last half dozen cell phones. Or possibly, if they did, I wouldn't realize that was the reason for the interference since it happens all the time anyway.
 
Just another reason to get rid of these silly baubles.

I did kill a pager with two shots from a Ruger MKII and would love to set up an IPSC or IDPA match where all the targets are cell phones and pagers. Might save us from terrorists.

But terrorism is just the latest facet to these idiot tools. They support some of the most insipid and inconsiderate social behavior I have ever experienced.

My employer provies me with a cell phone and it should be grateful to God that it survives each trip to the range.
 
So, since my cell phone is small enough to slip in my pocket and conceal very well, does that mean I'll need a license to carry a concealed cellular telephone? Will I be required to submit to another background check? Will they monitor my calls to make sure I'm not abusing the privledges bestowed upon me? I'm gonna go out and buy a fitted tinfoil hat so they can only monitor my words, not my thoughts.
 
I wonder if I have an assault cell phone. My cell phone has the detachable battery and folds in half but it is old(C&R?) and the battery is not high capacity. :D
 
I'm going to write my Congressman and demand that key locks be placed on all new cell phones. This must be done to make these killer phones "Child Safe.":rolleyes:
P.S. If you don't believe cell phones can be used as "terror weapons" you shold take a ride across town with my wife. I guarantee you will be terrorized.:what:
 
Cell phone blockers are widely used in Japan and legal, subject to regulation, in most other places. They are illegal in the U.S., not because of any "right" to engage in cell phone conversation, but because cell phone calls are considered radio transmissions, and interfering with radio transmissions is illegal. The justification given by the bureaucrats who dreamed this up is that a cell phone blocker could also block transmissions by emergency personnel in a disaster.

But I sure would like one of those cell phone blockers.
 
Cell phones do not cause a problem with avoinics but the frequency is only approved for ground to ground communications by our friends at the FCC. This is the reason cell phones are not allowed to be used on planes, that and it really will mess up the cell towers. At least this is my understanding of the issue, and as my wife tells me I am often wrong.
The cell phone ban drives me nuts, so I've looked into it, and as near as I can tell, the history of it is:
1) Cell phones come out. People start taking them everywhere. Some people use them on planes.
2) Cell phone companies find that the cell towers can't handle users roaming between cells as quickly as planes fly.
3) Cell phone companies go to the FAA and say "Please ban cell phones on planes"
4) FAA says "Sure, why not? Doesn't hurt us." They ban cell phones on planes.
5) A few years later, airlines see this market for making calls from planes, so they put those expensive little seatback phones in there.
6) Cell phone companies finally get with the program, and design their cell towers so they can more or less handle people roaming as quickly as they like.
7) Cell phone companies go to the FAA and say "Please lift the cell phone ban on planes"
8) The FAA doesn't actually have anything against this, but the airlines go whine to the FAA and ask them not to lift the ban.
9) The FAA compromises, and says that pilots can ban whatever electronics they want on planes, whenever they want. [*]
10) Airlines then tell pilots "You'll ban cell phones, or we'll fire you"

[*] This isn't, AFAIK, actually public. I've seen a copy of an FAA document describing this policy, it wasn't marked as being intended for public release. I'm not sure how to find it any more, though.

Perhaps I'm wrong. There aren't any guarantees in life, of course. But I don't think I'm wrong, and the story works. As always, you've got to judge for yourself.

(But if you doubt me, consider this: The cell towers emit vastly more RF energy than cell phones, and some airports have cell towers awfully close to them. And you can use a cell phone right by the gate door while a plane is taking off. (Supposedly its most sensitive time.) And would the FAA really let a plane fly if its avionics could be disrupted by a device that contains at most a single amp hour of power? The first jammer someone built would bring every plane out of the sky.)

They are illegal in the U.S., not because of any "right" to engage in cell phone conversation, but because cell phone calls are considered radio transmissions, and interfering with radio transmissions is illegal.
Only active jamming is illegal. I'm pretty sure you can build a Faraday cage into the walls of your building if you feel like it.
 
A soccer mom in a mini van on a cell phone is terroristic enough for me thank you. :cuss: Achnod with some C4 and a cell? Piece of cake.:p
 
Status
Not open for further replies.