Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Barrel burners? The real numbers.

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by Kachok, Jun 21, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Kachok

    Kachok Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2010
    Messages:
    4,429
    Location:
    Palestine TX
    OK the term barrel burner has been thrown around ALOT lately so I though a little scientific breakdown is needed to see which cartrages are really excessively overbore by measuring their powder to area ratio. All loads reflect an average of the max loads with heaviest bullet in each. Most of these are on the warm side at leased but I threw in the 308 seeing as it has a very long well known barrel life.

    22-250 913gr/sq in 36gr
    243 948gr/sq in 44gr
    25-06 1059gr/sq in 55gr
    6.5x55 840gr/sq in 46gr
    6.5-284 950gr/sq in 52gr
    264 win mag 1042gr/sq in 57gr
    270 win 912gr/sq in 55gr
    270WSM 1077gr/sq in 65gr
    280AI 900gr/sq in 57gr
    7mm Rem Mag 1011 gr/sq in 64gr
    308 win 605 gr/sq in 46gr
    300 win mag 881gr/sq in 67gr
    300WSM 855gr/sq in 65gr
    300 Ultra mag 1184gr/sq in 90gr
    So here is the breakdown
    600-700 Don't worry your grandchildren will likely be shooting from that barrel.
    700-800 Still pretty mild by any standard.
    800-900 Always let your barrel cool between strings if you want many years of service, getting hot.
    900-1000 Hard on barrels regardless of cooling, but acceptable barrel life can still be had.
    1000-1100 Barrel burner alert, with these expect to start loosing some accuracy quickly, often before you hit 1,000 rds
    1100+ Buy stock in Shilen because all of your money is going to them if you shoot alot.
    There are other factors involved too like barrel heat, brass design, and peak pressure but they are minor compared to the volume of burning abrasive being forced down your barrel at supersonic speeds.
    If anyone else would like me to run the numbers of their pet cartrage/load just let me know.
    I hope this clears things up for us a bit.
     
  2. taliv

    taliv Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2004
    Messages:
    22,368
    i think there are several additional factors that contribute. for example, angle of the shoulder
     
  3. MtnCreek

    MtnCreek Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2010
    Messages:
    3,976
    Location:
    West GA
    .22 x .50BMG. Figure about 225 grs of powder. :)
     
  4. jim243

    jim243 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2009
    Messages:
    1,992
    This has me confused. My interest is in the 243 you have listed. My standard load for this is with a 95 grain SST, not a 40 grain bullet. And my fps should be around 2,900 not the 4,000 that you can get with the 40 gain bullet.

    How can you say that you are using the heaviest bullet in each??? Or do you mean the lightest in each??

    Also I use the standard of 130 grain in the 270 not 55 grains, I save those for the 223.

    Jim
     
  5. MtnCreek

    MtnCreek Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2010
    Messages:
    3,976
    Location:
    West GA
    I think the grain listed is powder charge.
     
  6. jim243

    jim243 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2009
    Messages:
    1,992
    I feel like the church lady from SNL, "Oh, never mind".

    Jim
     
  7. USSR

    USSR Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    8,582
    Location:
    Finger Lakes Region of NY
    Nice chart, but meaningless. Too many other variables such as bullet weight, amount of powder, and type of powder (single base or double base) that will skew the numbers profoundly.

    Don
     
  8. Kachok

    Kachok Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2010
    Messages:
    4,429
    Location:
    Palestine TX
    Yeah that is 44gr or powder not a 44gr bullet. That is using a 100gr projectile which depending on the type of powder used you will max out at 42-46gr so I used the 44gr figure, does that make sense?
     
  9. Kachok

    Kachok Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2010
    Messages:
    4,429
    Location:
    Palestine TX
    Yeah I think I said that, it looked alot like "There are other factors involved too like barrel heat, brass design, and peak pressure" Sharper shoulders and long necks help no doubt, but they don't fix a 1,000gr/sq in ratio either.
     
  10. SpeedAKL

    SpeedAKL Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2007
    Messages:
    1,027
    Location:
    McLean, VA
    I've been told some of the biggest barrel burners are the .378-series Weatherby Mags and other mega-magnums (RUMs, .338 Lapua, Lazzeronis, etc). Any experience with therse?
     
  11. Kachok

    Kachok Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2010
    Messages:
    4,429
    Location:
    Palestine TX
    No hands on, but looking at the numbers the 30-378 Wby is just as bad as the 300 RUM and the Lazzeroni 7.82 Warbird is even worse 118gr of powder through a .308 bore is a whopping 1,552 gr/sq in!! The 338 Lapua is not as bad as some think, it only ranks about a 992gr/sq in which while hot is only a little more intense then a 270 win, mil spec rating on their barrels was 5,000rd if I remember correctly.
     
  12. rajb123

    rajb123 member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2010
    Messages:
    892
    I always tought the 22-250 was a mega barrel burner..... according to your chart ....not so much
     
  13. Kachok

    Kachok Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2010
    Messages:
    4,429
    Location:
    Palestine TX
    ^ Two reasons for that, one is that any Varmint caliber is likely to get called a barrel burner because people shoot so many rounds downrage often in a rapid fashion. Two is that the 22-250 is one of those cartrages people like to push over max loads, I have seen it several times where people are trying to push 4k fps. Those guys are the first to cry about having to get another barrel.
    Any cartrage used in any varmint hunting or match shooting is much more likely to be labled a barrel burner vs a big game hunting cartrage that we are in no hurry to shoot and might only go through a couple boxes of ammo a year. I will bet you anything my 270WSM barrel won't be shooting 1/2 MOA 1,000rd from now, but since neither varmint hunters nor match shooters use it I doubt it will ever become commonly called a barrel burner. 1,000 rd might last me the next 10 years as long as I don't use it as my main target rifle.
     
    Last edited: Jun 21, 2012
  14. valnar

    valnar Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2003
    Messages:
    1,409
    Location:
    Ohio
    ^ I also heard that there is some 'extra' physics thrown in on the smaller bores that increase wear compared to larger bores. What that factor is called, I do not recall. But I think empirically people will admit that the smaller bored barrels are indeed ones that get replaced more often.
     
  15. jim243

    jim243 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2009
    Messages:
    1,992
    Easier to shoot, less recoil more rounds down range.

    As an example, I can shoot 40 grain (243) bullets at 4,000 fps and get 750 rounds down range before my accuracy falls off, or I can shoot 95 grain bullets at 2,900 fps and get 1,500 rounds before accuracy falls off.

    You can choose how fast or slow you burn your barrel out.
    Jim
     
  16. Skyshot

    Skyshot Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2011
    Messages:
    936
    Location:
    Tn.
    Good chart, I think heat and pressure accelerate the process more than any other factors. Having said that I have a 7mm Rem Mag that has over 3k rounds through it and it still shoots sub 1/2 moa (5shots too) a 100yards. I keep waiting for it to go so I can rebarrel, but it's hangng in there. Also a 243 barrel that has over 2k rounds through it and they were smoking hot loads. But it also is still a tacker.
     
  17. Kachok

    Kachok Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2010
    Messages:
    4,429
    Location:
    Palestine TX
    What brand of barrel is that?? Most 7mm rem mags I have seen start dropping off at half that! Are you running full power loads or are you well under max?
     
  18. Skyshot

    Skyshot Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2011
    Messages:
    936
    Location:
    Tn.
    The 7mag is a 1971 Remington factory barrel, and no I don't shoot full power loads in it. Its always shot best in the mid-range of charges with IMR4831 and IMR7828 and the bullets have always been in 140 to 160 gr. weights. When I would increase charges it would open up so I took the "if it ain't broke don't fix it" attitude. I'm sure it's close to being on the verge, but as I have gotten older I don't shoot the big 7 as much. It's just relegated to deer hunting on cold clear days.
     
  19. joed

    joed Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2009
    Messages:
    2,202
    Location:
    Ohio
    I don't know if I agree about people pushing the .22-250 loads. Most of the loads I've seen on here aren't much faster then a .223.

    Me, I push the .22-250 for all it's worth. If I wanted a .223 I'd have bought one. I wanted a .220 Swift and I'll try to get as close to it in performance as I can.
     
  20. willypete

    willypete Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    418
    Sooooooo why didn't you just get a .220 swift? :confused:
     
  21. Kachok

    Kachok Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2010
    Messages:
    4,429
    Location:
    Palestine TX
    Hard to find 220 Swifts now, 22-250 has stolen it's thunder to say the least. There is only about a 100fps difference between them anyway.
     
  22. Arkansas Paul

    Arkansas Paul Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2009
    Messages:
    7,416
    Location:
    Central Arkansas

    Not trying to speak for joed, but probably because there are very limited options in .220 Swift these days and nearly unlimited ones for .22-250. Just a guess.
     
  23. Ridgerunner665

    Ridgerunner665 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2005
    Messages:
    3,400
    Location:
    Upper East Tennessee
    Shoulder angle and neck length both make a difference on throat wear...true...but nothing makes a bigger difference than the amount of hot abrasive getting blown through there with every shot.

    Somebody up there (I forget which post...read it earlier today) has this backwards....pushing light bullets to max velocity isn't near as hard on a barrel as pushing heavy bullets to max velocity.

    In truth...velocity itself has absolutely nothing to do with it...

    With light bullets one can use faster powders, that means LESS powder...to get the most velocity from heavier bullets require large doses of slower powders...and with that, you're pushing far more abrasive through the throat.

    An example....243 Win, 75 grain Sierra bullet, 40 grains of Varget...thats a pretty high stepping load in terms of velocity (3,200 fps from the 20" barrel on my 243), but very easy on the barrel. I know this because that is my coyote load...A deer load that I worked up for a buddy of mine...243 Win, 90 grain Nosler Ballistic Tip, 35 grains of Varget...3,100 fps, still easy on barrels.

    Another contributing factor to throat wear...solid copper bullets (Barnes), and solid gilding metal (Nosler E-Tip) is even worse...these can have a pretty big impact on throat wear too and is just another one of many reasons to fight lead bullet bans.
     
    Last edited: Jun 21, 2012
  24. Kachok

    Kachok Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2010
    Messages:
    4,429
    Location:
    Palestine TX
    I don't know Ridge I have seen both light/fast and heavy/slow burn barrels out pretty quick. Max loads for lighter bullets can be just as much powder if not a little more, max load for a 40gr 22-250 is 46.5gr of H380, max load for the 60gr bullet is 44gr or H4831sc similar results when comparing 243, 7mm-08 and others
     
  25. Ridgerunner665

    Ridgerunner665 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2005
    Messages:
    3,400
    Location:
    Upper East Tennessee
    Yes...but you can pick your powders and use less of it...

    For the 22-250...either Benchmark or IMR 3031 will work for the 40 grain(I used Varget when I had a 22-250)

    And for the 60 grains...H4895 and H322 are great.

    The point was you can still get all kinds of speed with faster powders and light bullets (and its more economical to do so).

    Even the 30-06, with 125 grain bullets...53 grains of H4895 will get the same velocity and will probably be just as accurate as 57 grains of Varget...all the while being easier on the barrel.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page