Because divorce is a sin,thats why.

Status
Not open for further replies.

gunsmith

member
Joined
May 8, 2003
Messages
5,906
Location
Reno, Nevada
http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/story.jsp?story=495055

Gun expert jailed for murdering ex-wife


By Paul Dykes
[email protected]

25 February 2004
THE former police armourer who shot his wife in the back of her head with his police-issue pistol has been sentenced to life imprisonment, with a minimum 11-year term, after pleading guilty to her murder.

Adrian Stewart Baird, (47), of Skerryview near Broughshane, was sentenced today by Lord Justice McCollum at Ballymena Crown Court, sitting at Laganside in Belfast.

The court heard that Baird admitted firing the single shot that killed his wife on February 10 last year, and that other than for his early guilty plea he would have likely faced a minimum 14-year tariff.

Katrina Baird (41) also suffered a broken nose and according to the official pathologist had injuries consistent with having been punched in the face, and partially strangled.

Lord Justice McCollum said he did not accept the version of events put forward by the defendant, but in view of the early plea, and the remorse shown, he felt that 11 years was the correct tariff for Baird to spend in custody before being considered for parole.

The court was told by Crown prosecutor Gordon Kerr QC that Baird travelled out to a remote farmhouse near Broughshane last February to confront his estranged wife at her workplace.

There were no witnesses to what happened at the farm, he said, but in an emergency phone call requesting an ambulance immediately after the killing, Baird told the operator that he "had lost the head and shot her" during an argument.

"She was just on the ground, and I just left her," the taped conversation continued.

"I am very sad and sorry."

Mr Kerr said it was clear from where the single 9mm pistol shell had been found that there was some distance between the victim and her murderer.

He had used the pistol given to him by the PSNI as his personal protection weapon in his role as a civilian police armourer. Mr Kerr said Baird told police that the couple were in the porch of the house, and that Baird had pulled the gun and aimed it at his own head.

Katrina Baird had turned him round in some way, and started walking away, with Baird holding the pistol in his right hand at waist height. He then fired one shot at his retreating wife, hitting her in the back of her head.

Baird's counsel, Richard Weir QC, said Baird had succumbed to jealousy after suspecting his estranged wife had been out socialising the previous night.

He said Baird contended he had gone out to the farmhouse to take his own life, using the weapon he carried regularly.

An argument had ensued, he said, and Baird admitted firing the fatal shot.

"He has accepted by his plea that he intended to kill his wife at that fell moment," Mr Weir told the court.

He said the change of plea to guilty in December had been done by Baird solely to spare the family any further suffering. Baird had intended to seek a manslaughter ruling in court.

In delivering his sentence, Lord Justice McCollum said the killing was a tragic case that had robbed a family of their father.

In setting the minimum 11-year term, he stressed that this was the absolute minimum Baird must serve in custody, and at the end of the term Baird would not automatically be released, but would have to be considered for parole.

He said the term included an element of deterrent to make men aware that they faced a substantial sentence if they murdered their spouse.

"I have difficulty in accepting his (Baird's) account of the actual killing of Mrs Baird. She was quite a distance away from him when shot, and it looks like she was moving away. It was a pretty deliberate act on his part.

"I don't accept this confused account of a struggle, or partial accidental firing of the gun. He went there with a gun in his possession, and jealousy in his heart, and then carried out this terrible act."

Family members in the public gallery, including the couple's eldest daughter Linzi (25) remained silent throughout the sentencing, and declined to comment outside the court.

Katrina Baird's parents, Sam and Margaret Gilchrist of Raceview Road, Broughshane, believe she was callously shot by a firearms expert who knew exactly what he was doing.

After killing his wife - the childhood sweetheart he first met 25 years ago - Baird gave himself up to police in Ballymena.

Baird was granted limited bail in the High Court soon after the killing to enable him to undergo pyschiatric treatment at hospital.

The victim was the mother of the couple's three children, and a grandmother.

The youngest child, Peter (11) now lives with the Gilchrists, while Linzi (25) and Steven (22) have their own homes.
 
11 years for murder.
Ain't we got a wonderful f****** "justice" system.

Whats wrong with shooting that piece of s*** in the back of the head:mad:
 
Take a nice deep breath....

M2, this was in England, according to the account. Had it happened in Texas, the prosecution quite possibly would have sought the death penalty.

;)
 
Oh well ...

At least the media didn't play the "when the gun just went off" angle ...
 
'till death do us part.............................:uhoh: I get that question frequently. The "heat of the moment" lost your head, what if scenario. Apparently it happens quite often. :( shame..........................

add: the link says "Belfast" in it. that's in Ireland.
 
Last edited:
:banghead:

"We have to show that murdering your wife is a particularly evil form of murder, so we'll give you at least 11 years".

What would they recomend for a "lesser" murder?



Snowdog

M2, this was in England, according to the account. Had it happened in Texas, the prosecution quite possibly would have sought the death penalty.

Northern Ireland. Part of the UK, but definitely not England. (Technically not Britain either, although the (Loyalist) Northern Irish tend to be more insistant that they are "British" than most other people from the various parts of the UK).

Also, AFAIK, in Northern Ireland you can legally own handguns, unlike the rest of the UK.
 
Ah, thanks iapetus.
When I see "United Kingdom", I automatically think "England" (though I know other locations apply). You know what happens when you assume... :eek:
 
Right guys,
It's too early, my eyes aren't open yet.
I didn't see Belfast.

But I'll give you an example of our justice system.

Very short version.:)

Years ago, a stranger threatened to kill my wife over the phone. To stab her.
Party line. 10:30 at night.
She got me from the barn and he was still on the phone.
You can guess how the conversation went.
Next morning I called the phone company and sent my wife to talk to the Sheriff.
The Sheriff already knew who it was. The POS was out on parole for incest with his daughter.
Wife came home and started to tell me what the Sheriff said.
I said, I'll tell you what he said.
You would have to press charges, it's a voice on the phone so you probably won't win anyhow.

I called the Sheriff and told him I was an ex Policeman so I understood the problem and I wasn't going to put my wife through that.
I asked the Sheriff where the POS lived (knowing he wouldn't tell me).
I asked him, what I really wanted to know, "What does he drive, so if I see it coming up the drive I know to fill it full of holes."
The sheriff wouldn't tell me.
Then I said something I shouldn't, "That's OK, I'll find him"
The Sheriff said, "I bet you will."

My wife said if we aren't going to do anything why did I go to the Sheriff?
I said I am going to do something. I wanted the Sheriff to know it is self defense.

I started hunting for the POS, with a 12 ga, without leaving a "paper trail".

The next day or so my wife heard the POS telling his lawyer, on the phone, he was going to kill his neighbor.

Before I found him he did kill his unarmed neighbor.
Shot him in the head with a 44 Mag in front of the guys wife, in the front yard.

Also short version.

The jury was stupid and found for man slaughter.
Then when they saw they had been "had" they gave him the max, 10 years.

The Sheriff told me a couple years later the guy served less than a year and had moved out of the county.
He wouldn't tell me where ( I still had the 12 ga shotgun;) )
 
M2, this was in England, according to the account. Had it happened in Texas, the prosecution quite possibly would have sought the death penalty.

Had it happened in Texas, the prosecution probably would have had a 44 Magnum trained on him during the trial. :p

While I think I lean towards being against the death penality, I don't see how anyone can rationalize 11 years possibly offsetting the deliberate and viscious taking of someone's life.
 
Anyone notice that according to the story, he shot her with a single head shot, from the hip, at some distance?

Must be some kind of trick shooter.
 
In delivering his sentence, Lord Justice McCollum said the killing was a tragic case that had robbed a family of their father.
???
The father made a decision and ...robbed a family of their MOTHER maybe. Must be something in the water over there that makes some people's thought process different. Perhaps the Lord Justice mis-spoke or was mis-quoted.
 
MrAcheson

If my wife had not gone in to tell the Sheriff she had been threatened, telling him later that the guy was out to kill her would have sounded pretty phoney don't you think?

Like,
"Well ya, he attacked me and I shot him. By the way he threatened to kill my wife last week"

If someone threatened to kill you, wouldn't you tell the law?
Even though the police probably can't do a thing about it.

Then to, there's more detail to the story that's too long to write.
Bottom line, he threatened to kill my wife and I wasn't going to give him a chance to carry out the threat.

Then when he did commit murder it didn't cost him a year.:mad:


Actually I think the Sheriff would have been happy if that POS would have wound up floating in the river.
Just another dope killing.
 
I really question whether or not the United Kingdom even has a "justice" system anymore when this man commits a stone cold killing and Tony Martin is jailed for acting in self defense.

It seems that the UK is rapidly falling into the kind of hell that the United States started to suffer in the 1960s through the 1980s, where the rights of the accused became absolutely paramount and the rights and suffering of the victim became essentially meaningless.

In the United States, at least, that situation has been somewhat reversed with stricter regulations regarding parol and early release and the effective application of the death penalty in some states, and even in two cases at the Federal level.

I have a nasty, nasty feeling, though, that there's not going to be any sort of backlash in the UK, and that it's just going to get worse.
 
Sadly Mike I have to agree with you .... it's very hard eh ... to rationalize any feeling of ''balance'' when you see this story and think of Tony Martin.

It will get worse .. the trend has been set in stone a long time already.
 
"It seems that the UK is rapidly falling into the kind of hell that the United States started to suffer in the 1960s through the 1980s, where the rights of the accused became absolutely paramount and the rights and suffering of the victim became essentially meaningless."

The rights of the accused *are* absolutely paramount. I'm sure all here agree that the concept of "innocent until proven guilty" is a good one. There are countries in the world where, if you are accused of a crime, you must prove your innocence.

Remember, he was charged *and convicted*. Where this case goes over the edge is in sentencing. I certainly agree that the suffering of the victim seems to have been ignored here. 11 years for murder?

Tim
 
Bad choice of words on my part, Tim.

I should have said "rights of the convicted criminal" become paramount, with the rights of the victim becoming meaningless.

A step in the positive direction is the increasing incorporation of victim impact statements in sentencing proceedings. Crime and its effects are not, and cannot be, viewed as being sterile.

There's still a long way to go, though, when the "system" views things like restraining orders as an effective barrier to continued domestic abuse, etc.

If, however, the rights of the accused actually were paramount, then the accused individual wouldn't be incarcerated in the first place...
 
"A step in the positive direction is the increasing incorporation of victim impact statements in sentencing proceedings."

Absolutely! Also, in the US, at least, victims and/or their families or other concerned parties are well within their rights to show up and testify at prisoners' parole hearings. I hope a similar system exists in the UK. If so, maybe this SOB can be held in prison for much longer.

"If, however, the rights of the accused actually were paramount, then the accused individual wouldn't be incarcerated in the first place..."

I'm not sure I understand where you're going here, but in general if the police are acting in good faith they are not considered to be violating your rights simply by arresting you. No one has a right never to be arrested. (Except maybe diplomats?)

Tim
 
Let's see.... she was beaten, strangled, and then shot in the back of the head. That is REAL consistent with his story that he went out there to kill HIMSELF......

I haven't seen such a ludicrous miscarriage of justice since the ex-wife of the Scarsdale diet doctor went over to his house with a gun and shot him dead and wounded the woman he was in bed with. The ex-wife's story was she went over there to commit suicide in front of him to make him feel bad.... RIGHT! Then she changed her mind and emptied the magazine into him and his new (younger) lady friend. That murdering witch got off with just a few years in jail.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top