Benelli M2 Supersport Review

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hoser

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 29, 2002
Messages
1,543
Location
A Forest Fire Near You
Well this weekend I had a chance to gun a few boxes of ammo through a Super Sport and compare it to my M-1.

My M-1 is built up for IPSC shooting, 21 inch VR Barrel, 10 round mag tube and a limbsaver recoil pad. No Dead Mules or mercury in the stock.

The Super Sport was bone stock. 28 inch with porting.

Both weigh about the same.

My main concern was recoil and if the M2 stock really did suck up all that recoil that Benelli says it does.

Both guns ran every type of ammo I had with me, everything from skeet to low recoil slug and 00 buck. I first tried some handicap/IPSC (1.125 oz @ 1,300 fps) ammo. It kicked, but not too bad. Not like a pump gun, but not like a 28 gauge as I had hoped. Same ammo through M1. Kicked about the same as the Super Sport.

Then some skeet (1oz @1,200 fps) ammo. Much less recoil than the handicap ammo. Could shoot this stuff all day long. Felt the same in my M-1.

I then tried some low recoil slug and 00 buck. The Super Sport shot the slugs to point of aim at 50 and 100 yards. Hitting a 12 inch plate at these ranges sitting was easy. The mod choke kept all 9 pellets inside an IPSC target A and C zone at 25 yards. My M-1 does the same.

We took off the stock to see if it could be stuck on an M-1. It can, but it would require some dremeling to the stock where the trigger group meets the stock. And the shape where the stock meets the receiver, just the bottom .25 inch or so, is a little different.

All in all, I dont think the M2 series is the gun its hyped up to be for recoil sensitive sissies like me. It does seem to take a little out of the initial sting/thump of a Benellis recoil, but its no 40-50%. I was hoping the recoil would be something around a Remington 1100, soft and pushy. The porting did help a bit with muzzle rise, but not recoil. At 25 yards my M-1 climbs about 12-18 inches offhand. The Super Sport maybe only climbed 8-12 inches. If anything, keeping the muzzle down adds to the straight back recoil. I took a set of Briley Spectrum choke tubes just to check the patterning of the guns to keep it apples to apples. They did not work. Their new Cryo tubes are a little narrower and much longer. The stock looking like carbon fiber looks cool to some, others hate it. Its just a dip on coating BTW. The best thing is the soft cheek piece. My cheek was not sore from shooting about 250 rounds over an afternoon.

I did shoot some skeet and trap with them. Both are light and mount (I shoot low gun) swing easy. All birds broke. Most broke due to being shot, the rest when the hit the ground. I would have shot a round or two of 5-Stand, but it was getting late.

I dont think Benelli will be getting another $1,500 from me.
 
Thanks for the review.I have a M190 that I really like .Porting works only with full loads, it's worthless for target loads, you should feel a difference there. The butt and cheekpiece have gel that's supposed to be recoil absorbing .You said you didn't notice recoil differences but it was easier on the cheek- is that due to stock shape ? BTW as a metallurgist I can tell you that the info on the website about cryo is a lot of BS. So much of recoil is dependent on stock design how much difference is there between the two ? . My O/U has a custom stock, which I really need and my M190 has been modified by extending the butt and adding height to the cheekpiece.Comments that have heard about the new Browning Cynergy is that everyone hates the stock especially getting their cheeks bruised.
 
Thanks for posting this, I had seen the ads for the SS and wondered if it was all hype or a design breakthrough.

Sisley did a recent piece in Sporting Clays mag and stated one of these kicked like his 391, obviously the new stock design had something going. Of course, there were several big full color ads for the thing in that issue. So much for Nick's veracity....

Despite the hype, I'd like to see how these work out for SC and general use as well as 3 gun.

For $1500(Roughly the price of 6, repeat SIX, used 870s) I'd want a weekend in Vegas too....
 
Interesting...

So no diff between the M1 and the SS thats too bad. Although I love benelli their technical data (if thats what you would have it called....) seems like some dude in marketing ripped apart the engineers report and left the "catchy words"... But its there and looking at it I would think that

a) the recoil pad

b) comfor tech system

would make a difference in the felt recoil (i dont know if the diff is 1.5k worth but there should be)

It could be the way you shoulder the gun that the comfor-tech system won't make a difference. I notice that the biggest difference in benelli shooters is the way they shoulder the gun. To some it kicks like a mule and to some its tame, to some it fails every so often and to some it runs like clock work.

But if you're not happy with it oh well :( hope you can get a refund or something hehe
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top