dmarbell
Member
As stated in my thread "Values of Clays Instruction," my instructor suggested that a Beretta 391 was a better gun for sporting clays than an 1100. I didn't get to ask him if he'd shot both. I did call the club and talked with someone else about the guns. They sell Berettas, admitted not being able to compete well on price, and don't sell Remingtons. This guy (not the instructor) said that one of the members has an 1100 Competition, shoots it a lot, and really likes it.
The 1100 price is slightly lower than the 391 price, based on reviews of gunbroker and gunsamerica. All things being equal, I would lean towards the Remington over the Italian-made Beretta (I am assuming the Remmy is US made, should have checked first!).
Let's hear from both sides, and especially from anyone who's shot both guns enough to tell any difference.
I like the looks of both guns, but that nickel receiver on the 1100 with the upgraded wood makes me drool.
Danny
The 1100 price is slightly lower than the 391 price, based on reviews of gunbroker and gunsamerica. All things being equal, I would lean towards the Remington over the Italian-made Beretta (I am assuming the Remmy is US made, should have checked first!).
Let's hear from both sides, and especially from anyone who's shot both guns enough to tell any difference.
I like the looks of both guns, but that nickel receiver on the 1100 with the upgraded wood makes me drool.
Danny