Beretta 92 reliability...
I don't own any Berettas, but I would rank them right up there with the most reliable autoloaders of all time. The truth is that the M9 is a great gun. You put a cheap, POS magazine in any gun and it will malfunction whether it is a Beretta, a Glock, a Sig, a HK, a XD, a 1911, or anything else for that matter. That is exactly what the military did with the M9 in recent years.
In actual military testing, with quality magazines, the M9 has an average of one malfunction every 21,500 rounds. This isn't coming from some BS internet claim or some BS online torture test. This is a stat that came from actual military testing. I suspect that Glock, or any other gun, would be hard pressed to match this performance in an unbiased test.
People rip on the Beretta, but there is a reason that most branches of our military still prefer the M9. They are incredibly reliable guns. They are also safe, and they are easy to shoot. With being stuck using FMJ, the 4.9" M9 barrels probably help to get better performance out of the 9mm. I see nothing wrong with the M9.
I almost wish that Glocks would be adopted by the military. I would love to hear the complaints about limp wristing, KBs, negligent discharges, magazine malfunctions, and even exploding barrels (a somewhat recent post on this forum). I'm not anti-Glock; I am just tired of all of the internet Glock perfection fairy tales. Most modern guns will match the performance of Glocks. I personally don't even think that Glocks are the best polymer pistol on the market any longer.
Why do people always have to get into these stupid pissin' matches with their favorite guns? It is so stupid. Glocks can be reliable, but so can Berettas and a lot of other guns. If you dig deep enough, you can find issues with every type of gun ever manufactured, including a lot of dirt on Glocks. No gun is perfect.