Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Beretta Nano 9mm

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by giggitygiggity, Apr 7, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. giggitygiggity

    giggitygiggity Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2009
    Messages:
    1,355
    Does anyone know anything or have experience with Beretta's Nano 9mm. Beretta makes good stuff and I'm hoping this gun upholds the Beretta reputation. It almost looks like the Taurus TCP.
     
  2. smalls

    smalls Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    2,433
    Location:
    Macomb County, MI
    Surprisingly, I haven't heard much about it at all. I thought it would be a lot more popular than it seems to be.
     
  3. Tigerjeebs

    Tigerjeebs Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    11
  4. greenlion

    greenlion Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2009
    Messages:
    536
    I handled one at the gun show a week ago. The grip felt really crowded and short, much more so than a Kahr PM9. Overall, the gun just felt very uncomfortable in my hand. The shape of it was not ergonomic at all.

    I think it is due to the fact that the Beretta has it's trigger mechanism above the trigger which pushes the trigger down further away from the slide. A Kahr has the trigger mechanism offset from the trigger in some way that keeps the trigger much higher up toward the slide. The end result is that the Kahr has more grip to hold onto, and feels much more ergonomic than the Beretta.

    I would pick the Kahr over the nano on the feel alone, regardless of how reliable the Beretta ends up being. The Kahr is smaller, lighter, and better designed for the human hand. It looks like an experienced company like Beretta, who has waited so long to get into the subcompact 9mm game, would at least try to one-up the competition, but the Nano is NOT a step forward in my opinion.
     
  5. BamAlmighty

    BamAlmighty Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2008
    Messages:
    285
    Location:
    West coast
    ^Exactly! Compared to the PM/CM9 the Nano misses.

    Side by side with a Kahr the Nano comes off as bulky and top heavy. The trigger... you'd think with a integrated trigger safety they would have put something nice in there, instead you get a clunky heavy pull. Of all the compact nines the Kahr still has the smoothest. Even without ANY safeties the Kahr still manages to have a lighter pull.
     
  6. greenlion

    greenlion Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2009
    Messages:
    536
    no one has one-upped KAHR yet in the pocket auto game. My bet is the new single stack S&W auto just announced doesn't either.
     
  7. The Lone Haranguer

    The Lone Haranguer Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Messages:
    11,717
    Location:
    Johnson City, TN
    delete
     
    Last edited: Apr 16, 2012
  8. gunnutery

    gunnutery Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2009
    Messages:
    1,682
    Location:
    Iowa
    For the record, I haven't shot or held one. However, from my observation, people want smaller guns to walk around with, either to match wardrobe or not having to mess with multiple holsters etc.

    Personally I don't want a "pocket" gun but for those that do, more (or technically less :) ) power to you. If the market has a demand for the smallest, most concealable, deep cover gun, Beretta answered the call. For the one random day that you'll be attacked with deadly force, it most likely won't be from 50' away, it'll be 5' or less. It's not for comfortable shooting, it's for comfortable carrying.
     
  9. bannockburn

    bannockburn Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2007
    Messages:
    14,434
    I checked out a Nano a couple of months ago and I just didn't care for the design or the ergos on it. The grip seemed like it was too vertical and too short in its presentation, making it feel uncomfortable and awkward in my hand. The other thing I didn't like about it was the heavy and somewhat gritty trigger pull that it had. Granted that may have just been that one particular model, but both things didn't seem to add up to a favorable design in a small 9mm.
     
  10. ZXD9

    ZXD9 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2005
    Messages:
    213
    Location:
    Georgia
    I've had one for a little over a month. I had about 2% FTE where it was either left in the chamber or stove piped. Sent back to Beretta and yesterday fired 150 rounds w/ no problems.

    Over on the Beretta forum there is a lot of discussion on this. Some have had no problems others see the same 2% failure I did. The feeling is that it is an extractor QC problem. They replaced mine.

    I like the gun. Shoots accurately and recoil ain't that bad.
     
  11. jpruitt

    jpruitt Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2008
    Messages:
    164
    Location:
    Tampa Bay, Florida
    From handling it at the store, short grip and top-heavy (though it may balance out with a loaded mag). I have also heard several reports of FTE problems. For nearly the same weight and size (and price) you can get a S&W M&P Shield (which has gotten much better early reports) or the proven Glock 26 or 27 (slightly thicker, I know).
     
  12. dubya450

    dubya450 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2012
    Messages:
    715
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Tigerjeebs, I agree, hickhock45 makes GREAT YouTube reviews. He's the first person I look for on YouTube whenever I'm considering a new pistol purchase.

    OP, I really like the idea of the Nano and my local range has one to rent. I plan on shooting tomorrow and if i do ill rent it and give ya some feedback. Hope I don't like it too much because ill be in trouble when i get home if you know what i mean lol... I'm sure most of you guys get what I'm sayin.
     
  13. WRGADog

    WRGADog Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2009
    Messages:
    645
    Location:
    Brevard County, FL
    I have a Nano an love the gun

    I have put about 500 rounds through the gun with no problems whatsoever. Thee gun is very accurate and reliable. It has become my primary carry gun. I also own a Kahr PM9 and Kahr P380 which are also fine guns, but I shoot the Nano far more accurately than the Kahrs. The Nano and PM9 are very similar in size. Although the Kahr PM9 is a bit Smaller. IMO the Nano is an excellent choice for concealed carry.
     
  14. MachIVshooter

    MachIVshooter Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2005
    Messages:
    14,648
    Location:
    Elbert County, CO
    Not one-upped, perhaps, but the slightly longer and taller PF-9 is a bit lighter.

    The Rorbaugh R9 is smaller and lighter than the PM9, but it also has problems associated with it's size, so although they beat Kahr in the dimensions game, they lost in maintenance and reliability (and price).

    The Nano? It kinda failed generally speaking when compared to the above and others.
     
  15. Fishbed77

    Fishbed77 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2010
    Messages:
    3,039
    I think the Nano is a nice gun, but a victim of poor timing, coming to market between the Kahr CM9 (lower-priced but still very high quality version of PM9) and the Smith & Wesson M&P Shield (that everyone seems to be abuzz about).
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page