Best .22lr Handgun around $500 or Less

Status
Not open for further replies.
You have a lot of options. I have a fair selection of .22 handguns and can't recommend against any of them. The Ruger Old Model Single Sixes are my favorite and I've been trying in vain to wear this one out, to the tune of 30,000rds over the last 12yrs. The CLC claro walnut grips cost more than the gun did.

IMG_7107b.jpg

New Models are okay too, this one is from a small special run for Davidson's in 1989-1990. Paid $225 NIB about six years ago.
NMSS%204_%20-%20021.jpg

And Bisleys, although this one's a .32.
Bisley%20.32%20-%20002.jpg


I also love older S&W K-22's and while I paid way under $500 for my 17 and 18, that can be difficult to do these days. Paid all of $265 for the 17 and $200 for the 18 but those days are long gone.
IMG_0925b.jpg


The Buckmark and Ruger MK-series are both excellent and I believe neither has a decided advantage over the other. I prefer the grip angle of the Buckmark and have been trying to wear out a pair of them since 1989. They are extremely accurate and dead reliable. My Bullseye model has turned in some quarter inch groups at 25yds. Had two Rugers and they were also accurate and reliable. I just couldn't get along with the grip angle until they introduced the 22/45RP model. Which to me is the best of the bunch. Mine has goodies from Volquartsen and ivory micarta grips by JP. The rhetoric about taking them apart is just that. They are not difficult to strip but I find that to be unnecessary but every several thousand rounds. If you're taking it down to clean every time you shoot it, you're way overdoing it.
IMG_7748b.jpg

The old Buckmark Standard with at least 20,000rds on the clock:
Buckmark%205_%20-%20031b.jpg


BuckMark isn't even in the same league, by design or execution.
I would strongly disagree with this statement.


The Ruger is less expensive too and its frame is not "stamped."
Since 1949 the Ruger standard auto has always had a stamped sheet metal grip frame. Not that it's an indictment against the design but it is true nonetheless.
 
I recommend the S&W Model 617 10 shot revolvers.
They're stainless and come with either a 4" or 6" inch barrel.
They can found used for about $500 or so.
Please tell me where? I have not seen a used 617 selling for much less than a $650. :uhoh:
 
The Ruger SR22 is on my "next to buy" list. From everything I've seen and heard about it, it fits what I'm looking for perfectly. Seems to eat about every major .22 ammo and since I'm not looking for just a "target" pistol this one sounds just about right.
 
I was going to say I love my H&R`s, & copy a few links, but heck I searched for more than 30 min. & this is the only one I found, I guess no one is selling their H&R`s. I know I would`nt sell any of mine..............

http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.aspx?Item=297435516

I also will never sell my H&R 929. If you can find one grab it.


Scott Campbell
Remember wheel guns are real guns too
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
 
The Ruger is less expensive too and its frame is not "stamped."[/QUOTE

"the most innovative aspect was that the pistol's frame was constructed of facing halves stamped from two flat sheets of steel and then welded together. Again not typical, but more than strong enough a .22 LR action and notably less expensive to produce than the forged or milled frames used by other .22 pistol makers-which was the main reason for the new Ruger pistol's remarkably low price respective to its competition, a position it kept for many, many years."

http://hunting.about.com/od/guns/l/aast50rugersa.htm

Rugers have always been cheap. Bill went to casting, not because it was better, because it was cheaper.

The .22 had a "lugar-esque-ness" to it because Bill recognized that WWII vets coveted the Lugar as a war prize.

The Ruger .22 has always been cheaply made yet accurate (not unlike the 10-22).
 
I've heard surprisingly good reviews of the very inexpensive Phoenix Arms HP-22. Can be had for about $140 or less at my local place, I've been quite tempted a few times...
 
The Ruger SR22 is on my "next to buy" list. From everything I've seen and heard about it, it fits what I'm looking for perfectly. Seems to eat about every major .22 ammo and since I'm not looking for just a "target" pistol this one sounds just about right.
It is great, really. Except, keep it away from any female gun user you have in the home. You'll never see it again.
 
It is great, really. Except, keep it away from any female gun user you have in the home. You'll never see it again.
Ha...that's what I hear. But as long as I can shoot cheap .22 at the range to my hearts content, then she can have it the rest of the time.
 
Except, keep it away from any female gun user you have in the home.

I gave a Ruger to my father.

When I was dating my current wife we took her to shoot. She was killing the tin can like an assassin.

When she was finished with the carnage she cleared it and went to hand it back to him, thanking him for allowing her to shoot it.

He said "honey, just keep it"

It may be her most treasured gun.

All that said, she bought (without my help) a Browning Buckmark (camper) a decade later.

I liked hers so much I bought one of my own.
 
Yes the Rugers are not difficult to deal with at all.
 

Attachments

  • ruger markIII with scope 004.jpg
    ruger markIII with scope 004.jpg
    91.1 KB · Views: 17
I gave a Ruger to my father.

When I was dating my current wife we took her to shoot. She was killing the tin can like an assassin.

When she was finished with the carnage she cleared it and went to hand it back to him, thanking him for allowing her to shoot it.

He said "honey, just keep it"

It may be her most treasured gun.

All that said, she bought (without my help) a Browning Buckmark (camper) a decade later.

I liked hers so much I bought one of my own.
Good. Nice to see the fairer sex getting involved more and more.
 
Supposed to have had a quote here from another post. Something to the tune of the Buck Mark not being in the same league as the Ruger....

That is a matter of opinion. But, you are entitled to yours. I love my Buck Mark. They are very nice, easily customized, and accurate. Nothing wrong with the Ruger, but I won't be buying one.
 
I will tell you what not to get

My .22 broke about two days ago and I'm sending it back:

432080_353559658057629_1563682650_n.jpg


Don't get a 22A like above. I found other posts with broken frames so it's an issue although they shoot great.

Also had a Walther P22. Sold it because the rear site is a POS that gets loose and the slide wore quickly. Stay clear!

I went for an all Steel robust piece... Ruger Mark III Target:

http://www.ruger.com/products/markIIITarget/specSheets/10103.html


Hope to pick it up next weekend.
 
Originally Posted by tuj View Post
I've had my MKIII for about 2 years now, I use it a lot and it STILL needs a rubber mallet to separate the upper from the lower.
That's disconcerting.
Well, to me that would be reassuring. If you don't want a tight fit between the receiver and grip frame, you can sand away as much as you like.

I'm going to go out on a limb and say a Ruger Mk is the most durable .22 handgun for the money. 22 revolvers are nice, but once you've used a 22 cliploader, you might never go back. That's the reason I hardly ever shoot my Phoenix HP22 anymore. The cliploaders only work for Ruger/Buckmark/Smith 22A's, ARAIK.
 
22 revolvers are nice, but once you've used a 22 cliploader, you might never go back.

I don't know about that... if it was always all about the quick reload, single action .22 revolvers would have ceased to exist long ago...


I like my autos, but I also like my revolvers. There are a few things you just can't do with an auto - mainly shoot a short or a CB (that isn't singly loaded).
 
Ruger Mark II target competition. I acquired mine Pre-owned. I got a trigger job and had a Clark Trigger installed. I added an Ultradot Match Dot. One of the most fun guns I've owned, aside from my larger calibers. Maintenance, once learned, is no more complicated than an AR-15 or a Semiautomatic Shotgun.

My goal is to get long distance shooting to 150 yards. I'm out to 75 yards, consistently. That's a big jump from my old and usual 7-15 yards a couple of years ago.
 
I have always wanted the H&R 999 9 shot break-top revolver. Life moved on, and H&R went out of business, and when I finally got around to looking for one, they were long gone. So I asked my Mom to keep an eye out for one, as she goes to a lot of gun shows and pawn shops. She found a nice one, for about $500.00, and waited. She finally found a like-new one in a pawn shop for only $235.00, and it' now one of my favorite .22s. It shoots great, reloads easily, and with 9 shots, you don't get the "I just got started and it's out of ammo" feeling a 6 shot .22 gives me. I also own a Colt Woodsman Match that my Grandpa bought new back in the 40s. I love that gun too but the H&R is my favorite to shoot and reload. It's great fun to shoot it, then break it open and send the empties flying.

So if there is a gun you want, be patient, and look around.

hR2.jpg
 
A tale of 2 guns

I took out a couple of my .22s and the difference was striking.

The 1st one I pulled out was the Ruger. What a simple, effective gun. If you look, sandwiched in the stamped, sheetmetal frame is the simplest trigger mechanism you will find. It is like a pellet pistol. But it is also light and smooth.

The next one I pulled out was a S&W 41. They stopped production because it was too expensive to sell (these days they employ lots of S&Ws famous "improvements" to cut costs and thus worth it to produce.) The 41 is complex, smooth as butter goose-squeeze and the quick change barrels are beautifully designed.

But for their purposes, which is better? The answer is both.

The Ruger is a basic, accurate, effective pistol at a very cheap price. It offered amazing value.

The S&W was a craftsman's dream. Expensive, luxurious and dead-on accurate itself.

Two guns with the same mission, for different customers.

I would NEVER trade my 41 for a Ruger, but you have to appreciate it for what it is. The best bargains ever to shoot a .22 that rides in a holster.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top