I believe the difference between the best .45 ACP and the worst .45 ACP is smaller than the difference between the best .380ACP and the worst .45ACP....but with today's technology the difference between some rounds is vast.
I believe the difference between the best .45 ACP and the worst .45 ACP is smaller than the difference between the best .380ACP and the worst .45ACP.
I don't chase the latest and greatest in .45 ACP ammo. I shoot more 230 gr. ball out of my 1911 than anything else.
From a common sense perspective, any .45ACP ammo you shoot out of your 1911 is going to perform better than even the best .380 ammo you've been relying on in the past, so I wouldn't worry too much about it.
If you've got to have the top shelf stuff, Federal HST is usually one of the top performers, and anything using the Barnes all copper bullet is usually pretty good. Speer Gold Dot, Remington Golden Saber, Winchester Ranger are all good.
I'm not sure of how that connects to my post and why you quoted it?.380 ACP isn't a 'service cartridge'.
The OP has gone from a .380 to .45ACP.Have always liked federal hst & even hydra-shok for .380, but I'm unfamiliar with .45 ammo.
What I meant by that is that I use hst for 9mm and other standard rounds but use hydra-shok specifically for .380 because its the only round that seems to get decent penetration while still expanding for .380 ( anemic ). I aware that there is a difference between .380 and .45 guess the way it reads threw everyone off cause there r a few people comenting on .380 compared to .45. To clarify .380-hydra shock / 9mm-hst / .45-? I was basically asking what everyone out there is prefers for a .45, just curious. Sorry for the confusionI'm not sure of how that connects to my post and why you quoted it?
Some context for my post in the event you haven't read the whole thread.
From the OP...
The OP has gone from a .380 to .45ACP.