Best Combative load in 5.56mm????

Status
Not open for further replies.

1lostinspace

member
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
124
I know our boys are using 77 gainers in the sandbox with great effect.
My rate of twist is 1:9 and my go to is a 16" AR I was wondering if anyone knows what powder will yield the highest FPS on a 75 grainer. I think my 16" will not stabilize a 77 grainer. I have used 25 gr Varget and 24.5 H4895 anyone have any data"?

Also please no .223 remington loads and if you dont know there is a differense please read below.

What is the difference between 5.56×45mm and .223 Remington ammo?

In the 1950's, the US military adopted the metric system of measurement and uses metric measurements to describe ammo. However, the US commercial ammo market typically used the English "caliber" measurements when describing ammo. "Caliber" is a shorthand way of saying "hundredths (or thousandths) of an inch." For example, a fifty caliber projectile is approximately fifty one-hundredths (.50) of an inch and a 357 caliber projectile is approximately three-hundred and fifty-seven thousandths (.357) of an inch. Dimensionally, 5.56 and .223 ammo are identical, though military 5.56 ammo is typically loaded to higher pressures and velocities than commercial ammo and may, in guns with extremely tight "match" .223 chambers, be unsafe to fire.

The chambers for .223 and 5.56 weapons are not the same either. Though the AR15 design provides an extremely strong action, high pressure signs on the brass and primers, extraction failures and cycling problems may be seen when firing hot 5.56 ammo in .223-chambered rifles. Military M16s and AR15s from Colt, Bushmaster, FN, DPMS, and some others, have the M16-spec chamber and should have no trouble firing hot 5.56 ammunition.

Military M16s have slightly more headspace and have a longer throat area, compared to the SAAMI .223 chamber spec, which was originally designed for bolt-action rifles. Commercial SAAMI-specification .223 chambers have a much shorter throat or leade and less freebore than the military chamber. Shooting 5.56 Mil-Spec ammo in a SAAMI-specification chamber can increase pressure dramatically, up to an additional 15,000 psi or more.

The military chamber is often referred to as a "5.56 NATO" chamber, as that is what is usually stamped on military barrels. Some commercial AR manufacturers use the tighter ".223" (i.e., SAAMI-spec and often labeled ".223" or ".223 Remington") chamber, which provides for increased accuracy but, in self-loading rifles, less cycling reliability, especially with hot-loaded military ammo. A few AR manufacturers use an in-between chamber spec, such as the Wylde chamber. Many mis-mark their barrels too, which further complicates things. You can generally tell what sort of chamber you are dealing with by the markings, if any, on the barrel, but always check with the manufacturer to be sure.

Typical Colt Mil-Spec-type markings: C MP 5.56 NATO 1/7

Typical Bushmaster markings: B MP 5.56 NATO 1/9 HBAR

DPMS marks their barrels ".223", though they actually have 5.56 chambers.

Olympic Arms marks their barrels with "556", with some additionally marked "SS" or "SUM." This marking is used on all barrels, even older barrels that used .223 chambers and current target models that also use .223 chambers. Non-target barrels made since 2001 should have 5.56 chambers.

Armalite typically doesn't mark their barrels. A2 and A4 models had .223 chambers until mid-2001, and have used 5.56 chambers since. The (t) models use .223 match chambers.

Rock River Arms uses the Wylde chamber specs on most rifles, and does not mark their barrels.

Most other AR manufacturers' barrels are unmarked, and chamber dimensions are unknown.



Opinion: In general it is a bad idea to attempt to fire 5.56 rounds (e.g., M193, M855) in .223 chambers, particularly with older rifles.





Fact: SAAMI specifically warns against the use of 5.56mm ammo in .223 chambers. The .223 SAAMI specification was originally made with bolt rifles in mind.

For more see the SAAMI website ammo warning.


5.56 v. .223 Remington specification.
 
Thanks for the lengthy history lesson. (Like I needed that!)

Since you are not bound by the Hague convention to use FMJ, or non-expanding bullets like the military, why not use any of the very good SP or HP hunting bullets available?

They will give much more reliable killing power, with far less chance of over-penetration and collateral damage then the 77 grain target bullets.

A good mushroom or explosive fragmentation is going to do much more damage then a long slow 77 grain target bullet that may or may not tumble & break into two parts. Especially out of a 16" carbine barrel.

Complete, safe, heavy bullet loading info for the .223 / 5.56 x 45 NATO can be found in any Hornady, Speer, Nosler, Barnes, Lyman, etc. reloading manual.
The Hornady manual at least, has a chapter for safe heavy bullet loads for the 5.56 NATO in the AR-15.

You do have a reloading manual don't you?

1224.jpg
rcmodel
 
RE-DO.........

I've tried the Hornady 75 gr V-Max with Varget, AA2520, & RE7. I just can't get them to group any better than a shotgun. I use a bushmaster Target master with a 1-9" twist. Go figure. But my rifle does like the 69 gr. Sierra Matchking & Varget.
 
A Glock 40 hahaha that's funny I saw that video 2.
You guys know there are a million idiot's that don't know the difference between .223 and 5.56mm anyways as far as the lethality of light hunting bullets I ll pass.
Here is what I found out the 77 rounders used in combat are either Nosler or SMK and are both loaded with TAC powder 24. grain to be exact.
As far as the TAP ammo comment I can't get in 5.56mm and the .223 is far underpowered for me I can get higher fps using 24.5 or 25gr Varget.
The TAC tech said make sure you don't go beyond 24.5 TAC pressures are at 60,000 PSI so I think I will work up and see.


and I don't have a Glock 40 it's a Glock 45 damn it now hand me that AR.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top