Best combat 5.56mm load????

Status
Not open for further replies.

1lostinspace

member
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
124
Best Combative load in 5.56mm????
I know our boys are using 77 gainers in the sandbox with great effect.
My rate of twist is 1:9 and my go to is a 16" AR I was wondering if anyone knows what powder will yield the highest FPS on a 75 grainer. I think my 16" will not stabilize a 77 grainer. I have used 25 gr Varget and 24.5 H4895 anyone have any data"?

Also please no .223 remington loads and if you dont know there is a differense please read below.

What is the difference between 5.56×45mm and .223 Remington ammo?

In the 1950's, the US military adopted the metric system of measurement and uses metric measurements to describe ammo. However, the US commercial ammo market typically used the English "caliber" measurements when describing ammo. "Caliber" is a shorthand way of saying "hundredths (or thousandths) of an inch." For example, a fifty caliber projectile is approximately fifty one-hundredths (.50) of an inch and a 357 caliber projectile is approximately three-hundred and fifty-seven thousandths (.357) of an inch. Dimensionally, 5.56 and .223 ammo are identical, though military 5.56 ammo is typically loaded to higher pressures and velocities than commercial ammo and may, in guns with extremely tight "match" .223 chambers, be unsafe to fire.

The chambers for .223 and 5.56 weapons are not the same either. Though the AR15 design provides an extremely strong action, high pressure signs on the brass and primers, extraction failures and cycling problems may be seen when firing hot 5.56 ammo in .223-chambered rifles. Military M16s and AR15s from Colt, Bushmaster, FN, DPMS, and some others, have the M16-spec chamber and should have no trouble firing hot 5.56 ammunition.

Military M16s have slightly more headspace and have a longer throat area, compared to the SAAMI .223 chamber spec, which was originally designed for bolt-action rifles. Commercial SAAMI-specification .223 chambers have a much shorter throat or leade and less freebore than the military chamber. Shooting 5.56 Mil-Spec ammo in a SAAMI-specification chamber can increase pressure dramatically, up to an additional 15,000 psi or more.

The military chamber is often referred to as a "5.56 NATO" chamber, as that is what is usually stamped on military barrels. Some commercial AR manufacturers use the tighter ".223" (i.e., SAAMI-spec and often labeled ".223" or ".223 Remington") chamber, which provides for increased accuracy but, in self-loading rifles, less cycling reliability, especially with hot-loaded military ammo. A few AR manufacturers use an in-between chamber spec, such as the Wylde chamber. Many mis-mark their barrels too, which further complicates things. You can generally tell what sort of chamber you are dealing with by the markings, if any, on the barrel, but always check with the manufacturer to be sure.

Typical Colt Mil-Spec-type markings: C MP 5.56 NATO 1/7

Typical Bushmaster markings: B MP 5.56 NATO 1/9 HBAR

DPMS marks their barrels ".223", though they actually have 5.56 chambers.

Olympic Arms marks their barrels with "556", with some additionally marked "SS" or "SUM." This marking is used on all barrels, even older barrels that used .223 chambers and current target models that also use .223 chambers. Non-target barrels made since 2001 should have 5.56 chambers.

Armalite typically doesn't mark their barrels. A2 and A4 models had .223 chambers until mid-2001, and have used 5.56 chambers since. The (t) models use .223 match chambers.

Rock River Arms uses the Wylde chamber specs on most rifles, and does not mark their barrels.

Most other AR manufacturers' barrels are unmarked, and chamber dimensions are unknown.



Opinion: In general it is a bad idea to attempt to fire 5.56 rounds (e.g., M193, M855) in .223 chambers, particularly with older rifles.
 
It's particularly a bad idea to load long military bullets in 223 chambers. The leade is too short and you can get high pressure.

If I had money to burn, and didn't care about Hague compliance, I'd load 0.224 Barnes TSX. They combine great accuracy, superb penetration and good expansion/weight retention. But they are not cheap.

According to QuickLoad, the best velocity will be obtained with W748. A fairly conservative load (48,125 PSI) should give around 2500+ in a 16 inch barrel if using commercial brass and the Hornady 75gn BTHP.

As always, start low and work you way up.

Code:
Cartridge          : .223 Rem. (SAAMI)
Bullet             : .224, 75, Hornady BTHP M 2279
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 2.260 inch or 57.40 mm
Barrel Length      : 16.0 inch or 406.4 mm
Powder             : Winchester 748

Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
incremented in steps of 1.282% of nominal charge.
CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !

Step    Fill. Charge   Vel.  Energy   Pmax   Pmuz  Prop.Burnt B_Time
 %       %    Grains   fps   ft.lbs    psi    psi      %        ms

-12.8   81    19.70   2192     800   32245   9079     88.0    1.108
-11.5   83    19.99   2226     825   33565   9260     88.9    1.090
-10.3   84    20.28   2260     850   34940   9439     89.7    1.072
-09.0   85    20.57   2294     876   36376   9614     90.5    1.055
-07.7   86    20.86   2328     902   37873   9786     91.2    1.037
-06.4   87    21.15   2362     929   39435   9954     92.0    1.017
-05.1   89    21.44   2396     956   41064  10118     92.7    0.998
-03.8   90    21.73   2430     984   42766  10277     93.4    0.979
-02.6   91    22.02   2464    1011   44543  10432     94.0    0.960
-01.3   92    22.31   2499    1040   46399  10582     94.6    0.942
+00.0   93    22.60   2533    1069   48340  10726     95.2    0.925  ! Near Maximum !
+01.3   95    22.89   2568    1098   50369  10865     95.8    0.907  ! Near Maximum !
+02.6   96    23.18   2602    1127   52491  10999     96.3    0.890  ! Near Maximum !
+03.8   97    23.47   2636    1158   54711  11126     96.8    0.874  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+05.1   98    23.76   2671    1188   57037  11247     97.3    0.857  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+06.4   99    24.05   2705    1219   59470  11361     97.7    0.842  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!

Results caused by ± 10% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge
Data for burning rate increased by 10% relative to nominal value:
+Ba     93    22.60   2677    1193   58616  10828     99.4    0.852  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Data for burning rate decreased by 10% relative to nominal value:
-Ba     93    22.60   2350     920   39338  10055     86.9    1.017
 
25.5 varget will give you higher fps and lower pressures.
Even better is TAC.

Win powder works great as 28 grain 748 CCI450 or mag primmer 55gr BTHP will equal m193 fps. But to use on a 75 is asking for trouble.:eek:
 
if you're asking for reloading info, the reloading forum would be a better place.

it's customary to credit the source of a body of text when you cut/paste it, rather than passing it off as your own, which we call plagiarism.

But to use on a 75 is asking for trouble

why?
 
I know our boys are using 77 gainers in the sandbox with great effect.

The vast majority of bad guys killed in Iraq by 5.56mm small arms fire are being put in the ground with M855 62 grain green tip. Mk 262 is a good round, but it is only issued on an extremely limited basis. Even in SOF units, most people are shooting green tip.
 
357 caliber projectile is approximately three-hundred and fifty-seven thousandths (.357) of an inch.

correct me if i'm wrong but i believe that a 357 is actually .355 0f an inch
 
You will have to try shooting the 77's in your 1:9 twist barrel to determine if they will stablize.

I have seen folks shoot 75's/77's in 1:9 twist barrels, and get blown groups. And after telling a guy who built a space gun with a 1:9 twist barrel that his barrel won't shoot the heavy stuff, guess what, his shot 75 Hornady A max very well. Like 190's at 600 yards well.

It is therefore my considered opinion that the 1:9 twist is marginal on bullets heavier than 69 grains. Some will do well, others won't. Give it a go.

As a combat round, I think the .223 is marginal anyway. Does not hurt to try heavier bullets. It is my recollection that the 77 grain was offered as a better combat bullet way back in the early 60's. And it was developed by the Army. Maybe it was the 69.
 
262

Okay, I gotta ask this question so I don't pass on a possibly untrue story about effective combat rounds in Iraq. (from a Marine who said he fought in Fallujah)

What does the Mk 262 look like?

M855 has the green tip, right, but is it easy to tell visually what Mk 262 looks like?
 
Talk to Black hills today and found out that the ammo they sell to the public is loaded mild they said that the combat version can be obtained with 24 grainTAC it is 100 fps faster so I am guessing they are using about 23 grain TAC
 
correct me if i'm wrong but i believe that a 357 is actually .355 0f an inch
.355 is 9mm - shoot that in a 38Spc or 357 Magnum and you'll have god awful leading and shotgun groups.
/Bryan
 
Okay, I gotta ask this question so I don't pass on a possibly untrue story about effective combat rounds in Iraq. (from a Marine who said he fought in Fallujah)

What does the Mk 262 look like?

M855 has the green tip, right, but is it easy to tell visually what Mk 262 looks like?

The Mk 262 bullet is unpainted, and (up close) is easily recognized by the pinhole in the nose from the OTM format. From a distance you could easily mistake it for M193 55 grain, I guess, though there's not much of that floating around in the military these days.

Headstamps on the cartridge, I'm not sure about -- the last lot of 262 I shot (about a week ago) was Winchester headstamp (WCC) and did not have the NATO cross-circle stamp either. I don't know if it's all in Winchester cases or that just what this lot was built with.
 
Okay, I sat next to a former Marine (had gone Army for career reasons) on an airplane and he told me he had fought in Fallujah.

He stated that early in the fight they had a lot of trouble putting down hajis who were high on drugs and a lot of trouble with "ghosts", guys who would go down but get back up and start shooting when the Marine squads had passed.

The Marines didn't like it, and called back for "more effective ammo." The "more effective ammo" made it to the front lines pretty quickly and he said it helped a bunch.

I asked him if they had swapped out for green tip ammo or what. He looked confused and said it didn't really look anything special. Then I got confused. Mk 262?

Any Marines who can comment?
 
I had the 262 issued to me in 05 when I was a SDM. Although it was definitely more accurate I couldnt truthfully say it was more effective than the 855's. Maybe the Marines with the "special ammo" if they were 262's were just more accurate and getting better hits. I have NEVER seen a person take a solid good hit with a 556 and not go down.
 
I have NEVER seen a person take a solid good hit with a 556 and not go down.

Well you sure are simply uninformed, I know because I read on the internet that the M16 can't kill anything but mosquitos and rats already dying from cancer.

[yes I'm kidding, thanks for your service and real, legitimate, first hand insight]
 
262 is not standard issue. M855 is. As C-grunt noted, the 262 is a specialty round.

I wonder how much of the accuracy of the 262 is from more attention on precision and accuracy placed on its manufacture compared to the omnipresent M855? Has anyone compared it to match grade 55gr or 62gr 5.56mm rounds to this round? It would make sense that it could outdo the ubiquitous M855 as match grade ammunition does. I would think some range is also gained with the 262.
 
DPMS actually marks their barrels '5.56' and they are usually closer to .223 specifications.
Bushmaster barrels can be had in 1/7 twist on special order and are all chrome lined except for Match barrels and stainless steel barrels.

Current Olympic barrels are all at 5.56 NATO chamber specifications unless special order different and these will be so marked.
The 'SS' marking indicates a stainless steel barrel.
The 'SUM' marking indicates a stainless steel barrel with broach cut rifling,(stainless, ultra match).
These are not chrome lined and are very good target shooting barrels.

Colt is Colt and I personally have not seen anything remarkable enough about their barrels to warrent the additional cost.

The rest I don't have enough experience with to comment on.

My preference is Bushmaster for chrome lined barrels and Olympic for non chrome lined barrels used mainly for Match shooting.

If you do not have to subscribe to military doctrine and the Hague convention agreements, a 62 grain soft point @ 3200 feet per second or better is very effective and will generally not overpenetrate.
It will not usually penetrate a car body or windshield either and this is where the 62 grain penetrator and the 77 grain Sierra really shine.

Any .223 round is capable of killing and stopping a human size threat that is not wearing heavy body armor.
Like it or not, the cartridge is more capable than many people give it credit for being.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top