Sir,
I am writing in complaint in the most formal matter than I can muster (since I cannot locate any other means of complain) regarding the Coatesville Police Department, one detective in particular, regarding a case from Wednesday, 3rd January of this year.
My name is Robert Drendall. I am a Coatesville resident – a pointedly law abiding one, I might add – since moving here from Delaware in August of last year. On 3rd January of this year, two firearms were stolen from my residence, both of them legally owned both of them legally purchased in Pennsylvania and summarily run through the State Police “it's not a registration program” registration program. I immediately reported this matter to your police department, and was met at the scene (my apartment) by one officer Knapp (his rank escapes me, though I seem to recall it was mentioned that he was a Corporal). Mr. Knapp was very professional, very courteous, and down to earth. I should stress that if anything he should be commended for his work regarding this case.
That evening, I received a telephone call from the station requesting that I and my girlfriend (I shan't delve too deeply into the details of the case at this point, nor my personal life) appear for an interview with one detective Quinn. My girlfriend could not return to Coatesville, having to work in Delaware until the wee hours of the morning. I reported to the police station for my interview, and was met with the most unprofessional and condescending treatment I have ever experienced in the state of Pennsylvania.
Detective Quinn wasted no time during our interview grilling me about the remainder of my (admittedly modest) firearm collection, a grand total of two rifles, two shotguns, and two pistols. Detective Quinn made it very apparent through his statements as well as tone that he had absolutely no interest in recovering my stolen property and ending the safety hazard it presents while in the hands of a thieving criminal; Rather, he made it abundantly clear that he intended to paint me as the “bad guy,” in my humble opinion singling me out because I have the audacity, in his eyes, to remain a lawful gun owner anywhere in his vicinity, and a holder of a Pennsylvania concealed carry permit besides.
While asking me very few questions about the suspected perpetrator of this crime, who I have identified to the best of my ability, provided a phone number and two photographs of his face, detective Quinn instead thought it necessary to interrogate me about my firearms instead, asking such loaded questions as, “Why do you need these guns?”
When I replied for self defense and target shooting, Quinn could not restrain himself, evidently, and flatly informed me that “I don't need these guns for target shooting.” Upon asking why I had an interest in firearms I mentioned a previous boss who got me started with shooting sports and instruction, and who was also involved in Cowboy Action shooting matches in Delaware and elsewhere. Ignoring the first half of my answer because it did not suit him, Quinn again felt the need to interject with his personal opinion and inform me “You do not use these weapons for cowboy action shooting,” tantamount to calling me a liar. I never said I did any such thing; I said that my boss did, and this got me interested in firearms as a whole.
Detective Quinn also berated me for having quote-unquote “high capacity magazines,” at one point pointedly asking me “what are you doing with high capacity magazines,” when referring to the factory 17 round magazines that came with one of the pistols that was stolen from me. I could only answer with the truth: I'm not “doing” anything with them, and the pistol in question has no “low capacity” 10 round magazines available for it since it is, quite literally, brand new on the marketplace. It is also of very important note that the federal “assault weapons ban” prohibiting magazines over ten rounds expired some years ago, and neither Pennsylvania nor the city of Coatesville have any laws on the books of which I am aware that prohibit such items. To wit, detective Quinn clearly thought that my ownership of something he did not personally approve of is “suspect,” which is grossly unprofessional and insulting besides.
I was already victimized of a crime once. I refuse to be victimized again by the opinions and invective of your police force. I am not a criminal and I am not afraid to step forward to express this fact. While I am hesitant to complain before my case is resolved (fearing some sort of personal retribution from detective Quinn himself) I cannot turn a blind eye to the crass unprofessionalism that was displayed to me on this night.
Detective Quinn, just as every other member of the Coatesville Police Force, has a job to do – And it needs to be made clear to him in no uncertain terms that as a public servant who is not elected or otherwise accountable to the citizens of his jurisdiction he must leave his political and personal opinions at home as soon as he puts on his badge. It needs to be expressed to detective Quinn in no uncertain terms that his anti-gun and anti-self defense rhetoric are neither necessary, appreciated, or appropriate on the job. It needs to be driven home in no uncertain terms to detective Quinn that while it is quite apparent he would desire that no one own a firearm for their own protection except him and possibly the rest of his police force, it is not his place to try to bully, threaten, or otherwise try to force this view upon anyone from his position. If I acted in such a way at my job I would be fired on the spot. I fail to see how detective Quinn's ego should render him immune the concept of professionalism and decency, and I will not stand to be insulted, harassed, or threatened in such a way as detective Quinn felt the need to subject me to on the night of the 3rd of January.
Sincerely,
(name and address removed)