This would be a great case for SCOTUS to take because it includes so-called "assault weapons", 'high capacity magazines", and even undergoing safety training just to purchase a firearm. Case is Bianchi v. Frosh.
I could see the safety training part being extremely restrictive for some folks, say the single mom with kids and 2 jobs, first getting the money for the training and then the time to do it.
They are forcing you to pay for and take training to exercise a Constitutionally protected right.
Getting one case that encapsulates so many issues is extremely good since SCOTUS takes so few cases a year and until recently hadn't taken a 2nd Amendment case in nearly a decade.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/25-states-urge-scotus-hear-case-fighting-maryland-firearms-ban
I could see the safety training part being extremely restrictive for some folks, say the single mom with kids and 2 jobs, first getting the money for the training and then the time to do it.
They are forcing you to pay for and take training to exercise a Constitutionally protected right.
Getting one case that encapsulates so many issues is extremely good since SCOTUS takes so few cases a year and until recently hadn't taken a 2nd Amendment case in nearly a decade.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/25-states-urge-scotus-hear-case-fighting-maryland-firearms-ban
Last edited: