Bias Against Glocks or Is It Just Me?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have a G21 and a 1911, my 1911 is my hobby gun, but I trust my life to my glock. personal preference, less to mess with when the air born defecation hits the rotating oscillator. Though, I am looking to build a 1911 in a few months... thats my stand :)
 
Everyone has their own opinion, but I would say THR is anti-Glock in general. If you want a pro-Glock board, go to Glocktalk.com.

Well, see I'm not looking for a "pro" or "anti" anything board. I'm just looking to enjoy participating in a forum filled with gun talk - things to learn and things to share. I would prefer that a board be as objective as possible but I realize that's not reality. Realizing that - I wanted to use this thread to get a feel for what everyone thought of Glocks as I "perceived" a bias against Glocks. This just helps me determine how much weight to place on what I read about Glocks in other posts on here....
 
I don't much care for them

And I have shot more than a few. For me, it is the trigger. I can live with the grip, I can live with the rather ugly squarishness, and while not my personal preference, the plastic frame is not, in and of itself a killer. What I hate is the trigger. Having grown up shooting S&W, Colt, and Rugers with fair to outstanding triggers, I find the Glock trigger to be crap.

While it might be fine for someone who doesn't know what a good trigger pull is (and that means a lot of the LEO and military personel nowdays), I can't see how anyone who has ever learned how to shoot a pistol with a decent trigger pull could be happy with a Glock. I have actually shot a Jennings that has a better trigger than some of the Glocks I have used, and while that Jennings is the exception to the rule, it still doesn't say much for the Glock!

And, as others have mentioned, the other reason I am anti-Glock is the attitude of some (not all, just some) of the Glock owners. Outright snobbery, and to me, this is annoying! There are some kids (mental age) that constantly post "get a Glock" or "Glock Perfection" or "that wouldn't have happened if you had a Glock" as and answer to everything. And bad as that is, it is worse when you are talking revolvers or rifles!

And also, there is the corporate attitude. Glock has a history of always insisting any problem is the shooter's fault. Most gun companies will listen, then decide. Glock decides, and you have to convince them otherwise.

So, all in all, Glocks don't give me a warm fuzzy, and I don't own any. My personal preference for autos are those that have an exposed hammer, or a safety lever, abd both is even better. Glock has neither, and is one more thing I'm not comfortable with.

Glock means clock, and while they may run like a fine watch, they don't feel like one to me. No, thanks.
 
As a tool, Glocks just work. They're simple and reliable and each model is basically the same across the board. I mean, once you've shot one, you've in essence shot them all (barring the differences in sizes of course). They all look the same (generally) and all function the same (generally). I have one and love it. I think it's probably one of the best pistols I've shot in terms of overall function and reliability.

I think the problem comes from an "American" gun mentality, which is that the firearm should be customized to the individual, as opposed to the German or Austrian Engineer's mentality which is, "we made this firearm after a million hours of research and it is engineered to the contours of your hand. It is reliable under every condition we could think of and if you use ammo as specified in the manual, it will function reliably for ever." It's the same thing when you look at a BMW motorcycle vs. a Harley Davidson. The BMW has fewer after-market accessories, but comes from the factory engineered to you. The Harley, you make it fit you.

The trouble comes along when Joe California wants to customize or shoot different loads than what the Austrian engineers intended or wants a custom grip or has an idea that goes against the engineers. Then all bets are off.

Some people don't "get that" or care for that. I trust Germanic engineering. People can complain about the grip angle and finger grooves all day long, but at the end of the day, you need to realize that the engineers wouldn't have put them there without reason or without a TON of research going into the design.
 
I carry a Glock. Sure, it's somewhat ugly, blocky in appearance. However, it does go bang, every time I pull the trigger. That is exactly what it is supposed to do.
 
Guys, please don't derail my thread. I'm not looking for a "war" on this - only some general words of wisdom.

Thanks again.
 
Some people dont like the grips, angle of grip, or lack of manual safety. Too many older male adolesence that cant keep their booger picker off the bang switch.
 
This out of Florida is the latest Police sanctioned KB I know about.

I like the Glock in 9mm. I witnessed a Glock 21 KB on a friend of mine with Federal factory ammo. No he didn't shoot lead or any reloads.

I got rid of my 21 and 30, and will not buy any Glock not in 9mm. Very few issues with the 9's,

It's America, they can blindly love an inanimate item, or use the best tool for the job.

When most folks who are not gun people ask me for a gun, if thy will not go with a revolver, I recommend the Glock 19.

Go figure.

Fred


Haven Police Ditch Glocks After Two Explode
Two of 90 Glock Model 37 pistols blew up in separate training incidents a year apart.

By Merissa Green
The Ledger


Published: Thursday, March 13, 2008 at 6:01 a.m.


WINTER HAVEN | The Police Department is ditching $38,000 worth of guns after two .45-caliber GAP Glock Model 37 pistols exploded in separate training incidents a year a part, causing minor injuries to an officer and a cadet.

"I've been around 34 years in law enforcement, and we've seen malfunctioning with guns, but never seen it explode," Police Chief Mark LeVine said.

"When I've got two guns out of 90 mess up, something's wrong."

The department has not had any problems with the guns during use in the line of duty.

The force of the explosions came down through the bottom of the guns and blew the triggers off, LeVine said.

Police Officer Frank Scianimanico, 32, and then-cadet Rodrique Jean-Louis, 20, suffered bruised fingers in the separate incidents.

As a result, the department will try an all-metal gun as a possible replacement for the plastic Glock during weapons testing Tuesday and March 20.

LeVine issued a memo Feb. 1 to his officers saying that if anyone was uncomfortable carrying the Glock they could carry a personal weapon instead, as long as the gun meets the department's requirements.

The department tried to work out a solution with Glock. The gun's Georgia-based manufacturer offered to swap out the nearly 2 1/2-year-old guns if the department paid the company $10,000.

But LeVine said that is unfair.

"I personally question if it should cost us anything at all," the chief said.

A Glock spokesman said the company is aware of the Winter Haven incidents, but hasn't had the opportunity to examine the guns yet.

"Without looking at the pistol, there's no way for us to make a determination," said Glock spokesman Carlos Guevara.


FIRST EXPLOSION

The first incident occurred in January 2007 when a Glock exploded while being used by Jean-Louis, a former cadet the department was sponsoring at the Polk Community College Kenneth C. Thompson Institute of Public Safety, which trains prospective police officers.

Department officials dismissed the incident as the fault of bad ammunition, and so did Glock.

The second incident, the one involving Scianiamancio, was this January during training at the department's shooting range at the Winter Haven Airport.

"We had another explode in the same fashion," LeVine said. "We've only got 90 guns, and two failed. It has caused a certain amount of uneasiness."

The issue seems to be with the gun, which only Glock makes, LeVine said.

The Polk County Sheriff's Office uses a different Glock, the .40-caliber Model 22 pistol, but there haven't been any incidents with it, said spokeswoman Carrie Rodgers.

The Sheriff's Office switched last year to the Glocks after using Smith & Wessons. The Glocks cost the agency $350 per gun, compared with $560 for the .45-caliber Smith & Wessons deputies were using.

"They're easier to fire, more accurate, and they hold more ammunition," Rodgers said.

Lake Alfred Police Chief Art Bodenheimer said he would never let his officers use a Glock after he saw a video demonstration of one being partially disassembled after being jammed.

His officers use Smith & Wessons instead, because it is an all-metal gun, compared to the plastic Glock, he said.

"I'm not a Glock enthusiast," Bodenheimer said.

The Winter Haven Police Department isn't the only one that has had problem with Glocks. At least two other law enforcement agencies have reported issues.


elsewhere in u.s.

Two .45-caliber Glock Model 21 pistols exploded in the hands of two officers at the Portland Police Department, according to a 2004 article in The Oregonian newspaper. That department then switched to 9 mm Glocks.

In 2006, The Oregonian reported an officer who was injured when his gun exploded filed a multi-million-dollar lawsuit against Glock and the ammunition manufacturer.

In Pennsylvania, a training officer with the Upper Darby Township Police Department said his department used to carry the Glock Model 21 before it started jamming.

The department is now testing a different model of Glock. "We can't get a reason why it keeps happening," he said.

Guevara said Glock's guns aren't defective, and malfunctioning incidents at other agencies are attributed to ammunition or maintenance of the guns.

And the fact that the Portland Police Department switched to a different Glock model is an indication of how good Glock guns are, Guevara said.
 
I have nothing against glocks. They are good guns. "good" being the key word. Great? no. Good, okay. I'll keep gathering Sigs and HK's
 
I think here we do a pretty good job of assessing their strengths and shortcomings fairly. I own one myself, a G19 which I recently upgraded with night sights. Despite other guns coming along (notably the S&W M&P) in the interim, it is still one of my favorites. I think it is perhaps the most "size-efficient" (external dimensions vs. capacity) handgun out there.
 
As has been pointed out, the tendency for some poeple to hate them passionately is fueled by those who push the Glock pistol so hard, especially when the person seeking advice either did not ask about Glocks, does not like Glocks or a service-type pistol is not appropriate for the intended use.

I see the mentality in the gun shops as well. I help out at my buddy's place on my off days. There is another guy there who is one such Glock person. Whenever someone comes in asking what pistol we recommend for this or that, he will pull every Glock out of the case and ignore all the other pistols in the store. When someone comes in specifically asking about another handgun (even revolvers), he tries to push Glocks. He will even continue trying to sell them when the person has shown no interest or even stated that they did not like the Glock. This is what causes people to hate Glocks. Me? I don't care for them, but I don't ignore their qualities. When I handle the customer that comes into the store looking for a handgun in .45, I will pull out a G21, G21SF, XD 45, M&P 45, Baby Eagle .45, 1911, and maybe a couple others if we have 'em and let the customer decide what fits.

I can say that Glock does need to rethink their ergo's. While the pistols are plenty accurate, durable and reliable, the XD and M&P are preferred by most where comfort is concerned. When someone comes in without preconceptions, they usually leave with the XD or M&P (or one of many metal frame guns). Glocks usually leave with someone who came in specifically looking for a Glock.
 
you have to understand that some people like this and not that and some people like that and not this but others like both

thats me i like both what i mean is, i like glocks but i like 1911 and most other kinds of handguns too, glocks are what they are and thats a tool they function with out flaw and they are mostly rust/corrosion proof but they are "ugly" as some people think (not me) however 1911 are beautiful but they maybe prone to rust if not taken care of properly and somtimes they might have a malfunction and some people choose to have the malfunctions and beauty over the ugly simplicity of a glock.

bottom line choose what you like and go with that dont let other people tell you what you like
 
I am perfectly content with my selection of Glocks and I don't care what anyone says about it. They are my fighting guns as I carry a revolver when I carry.
 
I've had Glocks, Sigs, 1911s, revolvers. I traded my Glock for a Kimber (and some $$$) and never regretted it. When I went looking for a new 9, I considered the Glock but I bought the XD. It just felt better in my hand.

To each his own...
 
pyle said:
Greetings Everyone:

I've been reading this forum for quite a while now but I only signed up recently. I'm wondering if there is a "bias" against Glock handguns here or if it's just me being overly sensitive - as I like Glocks?

If the overall sentiment of the posters on this board is truly slanted against Glock pistols - I'm wondering why?

At this time, I own two Glock pistols - a G21 and a G27. Although I've had the G21 for about 7 years (G27 for 5 years) - I've had absolutely no problems with either of them. They shoot very well and I'm totally sold on Glocks. I have other handguns also and I like them too. I guess I'm wondering if I'm missing something? Maybe I'm just lucky with my two Glock's? Just curious.......

It seems like lots of people bad mouth Glocks (Most of them say the 1911 .45 is perfect), but I haven't noticed it as much on this forum.

BTW I like other handguns but if I had to have only handgun it would be a G19!
 
I'm a Glock Fan.

For one thing, they have way less parts than a 1911.

They can be worked on very easily(you don't HAVE to attend a Glock Armorers course - but it does help).

And most parts are simply drop in.

When it comes to feeling the gun, a 1911 'feels' better to me. It is wood and steel, it has 'soul' for lack of a better term compared to a Glock.

But I shoot Glocks better than 1911's because I grew up on a Glock, so I stick with them. Especially since money is tight, I can't afford to go off in all sorts of directions.

I have big hands, so they fit me great.

To each his own.
 
I have been on several different forums. It is the same everywhere. If you have a differing opinion, or provide data that crushes their beliefs (this goes for MFGs, ballistic data, etc). They pull the strawman arguments on ya.

Unfortunately, differing opinions breed idiocy when closed minded people meet.
 
What you find in these boards, is that any given topic attracts extremes of opinion. If it's something most people don't care about one way or another, they just don't post.

I don't own a Glock anymore, but when beginners ask me what their one beginning, long-term, multi-use gun should be, I always steer them to Glock.
 
What you find in these boards, is that any given topic attracts extremes of opinion. If it's something most people don't care about one way or another, they just don't post.
7.62 vs 5.56! 9mil vs .45! .50bmg vs any other long range round! The list goes on and on.

This is why we should separate our personal beliefs from the hard ballistic data.

But yeah, anyway.
 
Glocks are accurate, reliable, ubiquitous, and available in many sizes and calibers. They are a successful and useful pistol.
That said, I just don't like em', not one bit!
 
I personally don't like Glocks because they are so light and when I'm shooting I want to feel the gun. That being said I don't carry a gun all day long.

I have nothing against Glocks, they are great firearms, just not for me. If a Glock feels right in your hand then go Glock, a Ruger feels right in mine and my wifes so that's what we own. As long as it's a quality firearm buy and own what feels best to you.
 
The 1911 was built with MY hand in mind!

I never thought the grip shape of the 17 was for me, but I once lusted after a 19.

I own two 1911, one Astra 9mm and one S&W 9mm. Next handgun purchase will be something in a .22 wheelgun.
 
I disagree with the premise there is bias against Glocks. If anything it seems there is a pro-Glock bias with the forum users weighing in on every question with "Glock Perfection!"

Too many Glock fans make it hard not to sound a little bitter once in a while, especially when their comments are completely uncalled for.

I've owned about a dozen Glocks. I only had one that really gave me any issues. Now I'll irritate the Glock fans. I've found they are not capable of the kind of accuracy that other designs are routinely capable of without significant investment.

I consider them entry level firearms. In terms of quality they are the least expensive autos I would sincerely recommend for self defense or competition. This is not a backhanded slap at Ruger, Bersa, Firestorm or the myriad other cheaper guns. It is an outright statement they do not meet my personal standards.

I sold the last on my Glocks around '01. None of them shot up to the standards I demand of my guns. I have no complaints about the frame size, grips, etc., although I do find the guns lack personality.

My complaints are in the trigger, the mechanism, barrels and sights. Sure, they can be upgraded, but you can buy a gun with the upgrades in other formats for less money than it will cost to make the modifications to a Glock.

The assertion that the only reliable guns in the world are Glocks are ridiculous. As is the idea they can be as accurate as a finely tuned 1911. I know the Glock fans will find that statement very irritating, but I suggest they go shoot Bull's Eye competition and count the Glocks. The count will end with the gun they brought.

The issue doesn't seem to be so much Glock bashing, but convincing the Glock fanatics there are other guns out there that may do the job just as well or, God forbid, even better. Some are even less expensive - just ask any CZ75 owner.

The biggest virtue I can ascribe to Glocks is they are very fast first-shot guns.

As I said, they are the minimum I would recommend in an auto loader. It may not seem like it, but that is a very high recommendation.

I own a lot of handguns, but very few stiker-fired ones. I don't like the system. That doesn't mean it doesn't work. I just don't like it.

My favorite caliber is .45 acp. Most of them are some variation of the 1911. But, the ones I use to compete or most frequently carry for SD are of the CZ pattern. Reliability of my 45s has never been an issue.

Accuracy is where they shine. I can hand you 45 after 45 that are one-hole guns at 25 yards. The fact is that I've never owned or seen a Glock that is a one-hole gun at 25 yards. That is not to say I haven't heard (particularly on this forum) about Glocks that are as accurate. I've just never seen it.

I've shot competitively in IDPA, IPSC and LE matches about twice a month for 12 years. If such Glocks exist I think I'd have seen at least one. After all, most competitors use the best gun for the job they can afford regardless of brand.

No matter what anybody says, I think they are the best entry-level auto on the market. Once you learn to detail strip a 1911, a CZ, a Hi-Power or a SIG, you'll probably find there's something else you enjoy more and rewards you with better accuracy.
 
I've shot them, but

I don't have one. Not yet, at least. I liked the ones that I was shooting. Very easy to shoot, very easy to handle. Just getting used to feeling two parts to a trigger at first and the same trigger no matter what (i.e. no double action first, single action after that) was the only glitch I had. Shot them in .45, .40 and 9mm.

I don't really understand the drooling or the growling, but as I am a lawyer, I am usually the one making people drool or growl. :D :neener:

The Doc is out now. :cool:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top