HighVelocity
Member
I went to the local indoor range this evening for a little paper punching. I took a few hundred rounds of WWB 230gr fmj and my Glock 21, which I think shoots pretty good.
The guy next to me was shooting an HK USP 45. We got to talking and ended up trying eachothers 45's. I could not shoot the HK for beans. In fact, the guy even shot my Glock considerably better than his own HK.
Both have polygonal rifling, we each used our own ammo. WWB for me in both guns and Rem UMC in both for him.
For the additional cost of the HK, I sure didn't see any advantage over the Glock at all. In fact the HK feels even chunkier in my hand. I left feeling that the HK should either cost less or the G21 should cost a lot more considering the quality of each pistol.
The guy next to me was shooting an HK USP 45. We got to talking and ended up trying eachothers 45's. I could not shoot the HK for beans. In fact, the guy even shot my Glock considerably better than his own HK.
Both have polygonal rifling, we each used our own ammo. WWB for me in both guns and Rem UMC in both for him.
For the additional cost of the HK, I sure didn't see any advantage over the Glock at all. In fact the HK feels even chunkier in my hand. I left feeling that the HK should either cost less or the G21 should cost a lot more considering the quality of each pistol.