Brady Campaign Sinks to New Low

Status
Not open for further replies.

mike101

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2006
Messages
1,443
Location
SOUTH Jersey
Folks, you're not going to believe what is awaiting you on the BC's homepage this morning.

http://www.bradycampaign.org/

"In a major threat to the visitors and citizens of the Nation's Capital, Congress will soon consider legislation that would allow dangerous people to openly carry assault rifles and other military weapons on the streets of our Nation's Capital.

The bill, H.R. 6691, would allow nearly anyone, even teenagers and children, to carry loaded assault rifles on the streets of our Nation's Capital. It would mean law enforcement could not stop individuals from arming themselves with assault rifles and .50 caliber rifles near federal and government buildings or motorcade routes.

The lobbyists for the gun industry are deceptively suggesting that the legislation is needed for the city to comply with the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in District of Columbia v. Heller. Instead of giving the local elected officials a fair and reasonable opportunity to enact permanent regulations, the gun lobby is pushing Congress to enact dangerous and sweeping legislation that goes far beyond the mandates of Heller.

In reality, the bill is just another effort by the gun lobby to push its extremist

In a major threat to the visitors and citizens of the Nation's Capital, Congress will soon consider legislation that would allow dangerous people to openly carry assault rifles and other military weapons on the streets of our Nation's Capital.

The bill, H.R. 6691, would allow nearly anyone, even teenagers and children, to carry loaded assault rifles on the streets of our Nation's Capital. It would mean law enforcement could not stop individuals from arming themselves with assault rifles and .50 caliber rifles near federal and government buildings or motorcade routes.

The lobbyists for the gun industry are deceptively suggesting that the legislation is needed for the city to comply with the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in District of Columbia v. Heller. Instead of giving the local elected officials a fair and reasonable opportunity to enact permanent regulations, the gun lobby is pushing Congress to enact dangerous and sweeping legislation that goes far beyond the mandates of Heller.

In reality, the bill is just another effort by the gun lobby to push its extremist"

This is in response to the effort to remove DC's blatantly uncostitutional and defiant semi-auto ban.

If you would like to battle the Bradybots on Huffpo, Huffpo has changed their policy. When you register, your account goes active immediately, and you can commence firing right away, instead of having to wait a day or two.
 
Just FYI It's a Democractic Bill and it doesn't address at all the question of carrying a firearm. I just skimmed it, but those who have reviewed it say it is better than the Republican bill.

Link to the bill is here: http://www.snowflakesinhell.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/hr6691.pdf

I skimmed it, it is actually a well thought out bill that is seeking to restore the Second Amendment rights to the people of D.C. The fact that the Brady Campaign would come out against it the way that they did proves that they are really seeking to ban guns and all that other talk about "sensible" gun laws is a lie.
 
This is awesome - if you click the button "Click here to tell congress: don't weaken DC gun laws" it gives you a pre-written form that you can PERSONALIZE to say whatever you want :D

So here is how it starts:

Oppose H.R. 6691: Don't Recklessly Weaken D.C.'s Gun Laws

Please oppose H.R. 6691 and any other legislation that would eliminate or recklessly weaken gun laws in our nation's capital city.

The gun lobby is deceptively suggesting that H.R. 6691 is needed for D.C. to comply with the Supreme Court's ruling in the Heller case. The reality is that the bill goes far beyond what the city must do, and is just another effort by the gun lobby to push its extremist agenda.

This bill is so sweeping that it would allow nearly anyone, even teenagers and children, to carry loaded assault rifles on the streets of our Nation's Capital. Law enforcement could not stop individuals from arming themselves with assault rifles and .50 caliber rifles near federal and government buildings or motorcade routes.

H.R. 6691 would also prevent the District from enacting future laws that would "discourage" the private ownership or use of firearms.

H.R. 6691 would endanger not only D.C. residents, but also all those who work in and visit the capital.

And here is how I've "personalized" it:

Support H.R. 6691: Eliminate D.C.'s Unneeded and Unconstitutional Gun Laws

Please support H.R. 6691 and any other legislation that would eliminate or responsibly overturn illegal gun laws in our nation's capital city.

The gun lobby is correct that H.R. 6691 is needed for D.C. to comply with the Supreme Court's ruling in the Heller case and with the entire Second Amendment. The reality is that the bill is exactly what the city must do, and will bring DC back in compliance with the US Constitution.

This bill is so sweeping that it would allow any lawfully armed citizen, even teenagers and children under proper adult supervision, to own any firearms legal under Federal law in the homes and vehicles of our Nation's Capital. Law enforcement could still stop individuals from arming themselves with assault rifles and .50 caliber rifles near federal and government buildings or motorcade routes, but would not be able to illegally disarm them elsewhere.

H.R. 6691 would also prevent the District from enacting future laws that would "discourage" the private ownership or use of firearms, which is an abomonation against the United States Constitution and the idea of American liberty.

H.R. 6691 would protect not only D.C. residents, but also all those who work in and visit the capital.

HOW AWESOME IS THAT!?!? Unfortunately they will apparrently add me to their mailing list, but that's just a good opportunity for me to consume their resources and use their "business reply cards" to mail them bricks and shoeboxes full of rocks and the like on their dime :)
 
Actually, there is a lovely and potentially very signficant little sleeper in this document.

The document prefaces saying that the GCA (1968), FOPA (1986) and Brady Act (1993) must be adhered to.

Then the last paragraph says.

21 SEC. 10. AUTHORIZING PURCHASES OF FIREARMS BY DIS-
22 TRICT RESIDENTS.
23 Section 922 of title 18, United States Code, is
24 amended in paragraph (b)(3) by inserting after ‘‘other
25 than a State in which the licensee’s place of business is
•HR 6691 IH
VerDate Aug 31 2005 17:02 Aug 02, 2008 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H6691.IH H6691
12
1 located’’ the following: ‘‘, or to the sale or delivery of a
2 handgun to a resident of the District of Columbia by a
3 licensee whose place of business is located in Maryland or
4 Virginia,’’


This completely overturns, albeit in a limited way, one of the core restrictions, the "Though can only buy and take ownership of a handgun in your own state".

Any half way competent lawyer can reasonably argue that if DC can buy from Maryland or Virginia than it follows that this must also reasonably be a bi-directional flow.

If then MD and VA can buy from DC there can be no reasonable restriction on a triangular flow.

Ergo, based on the very Commerce Acts that have been used to restrict legal firearms sales then there cannot be such an artificial constraint applied upon the remaining 48 states.

Further, since the magazine restrictions have been completely voided for DC, I could see this being usefully employed as a tool to attack the artificial constraints on magazine capacity constraints in places like NY, NJ etc.

The Law of Unintended Consequences at it's best, don't you just love it when a plan start to come together......:D
 
I also used their form to support the bill. Pass the link around, folks, before they make the subject box un-editable.

By the way, where do they get off saying that the bill supports children prowling the streets with AK47s? I guess that they're betting that folks won't read the actual bill. I guess they're taking a lesson from Josef Goebbels, who said that if one is going to lie, make it a whopper and keep repeating it and people will believe it.

Children on the streets with AK47s? Holy crap.
 
Everyone carrying guns?

They say that like it's a bad thing.

Sounds great to me.
 
Here's What Brady Is Whining About



The bill itself:

110th CONGRESS

2d Session

H. R. 6691
To restore Second Amendment rights in the District of Columbia.


IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

July 31, 2008
Mr. CHILDERS (for himself, Mr. ALTMIRE, Mr. CAZAYOUX, Mr. DINGELL, Mr. ROSS, Mr. TANNER, Mr. STUPAK, Ms. HERSETH SANDLIN, Mr. ELLSWORTH, Mr. MELANCON, Mr. CHANDLER, Mr. LINCOLN DAVIS of Tennessee, Mr. BOYD of Florida, Mr. MATHESON, Mr. CARDOZA, Mr. CARNEY, Mr. KAGEN, Mr. HOLDEN, Mr. SHULER, Mr. LAMPSON, Mr. HILL, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. SPACE, Mr. BARROW, Mr. MCINTYRE, Mr. BISHOP of Georgia, Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas, Mr. GORDON of Tennessee, Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota, Mr. BOREN, Mr. DONNELLY, Mr. WALZ of Minnesota, Mrs. BOYDA of Kansas, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mr. SOUDER, Mr. HAYES, Mr. SALI, Mr. WALBERG, Mr. PATRICK J. MURPHY of Pennsylvania, Mr. COOPER, Mr. BOUCHER, Mr. MURTHA, Mr. BOSWELL, Mr. BERRY, Mr. DAVIS of Alabama, Mr. KANJORSKI, Mr. SALAZAR, Mr. MAHONEY of Florida, Mr. MARSHALL, Mr. MCNERNEY, Mr. HODES, Mr. SESSIONS, and Ms. SHEA-PORTER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


A BILL
To restore Second Amendment rights in the District of Columbia.


Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the `Second Amendment Enforcement Act'.

SEC. 2. CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS.

Congress finds the following:

(1) The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

(2) As the Congress and the Supreme Court of the United States have recognized, the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the rights of individuals, including those who are not members of a militia or engaged in military service or training, to keep and bear arms.

(3) The law-abiding citizens of the District of Columbia are deprived by local laws of handguns, rifles, and shotguns that are commonly kept by law-abiding persons throughout the United States for sporting use and for lawful defense of their persons, homes, businesses, and families.

(4) The District of Columbia has the highest per capita murder rate in the Nation, which may be attributed in part to local laws prohibiting possession of firearms by law-abiding persons who would otherwise be able to defend themselves and their loved ones in their own homes and businesses.

(5) The Federal Gun Control Act of 1968, as amended by the Firearms Owners' Protection Act of 1986, and the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act of 1993, provide comprehensive Federal regulations applicable in the District of Columbia as elsewhere. In addition, existing District of Columbia criminal laws punish possession and illegal use of firearms by violent criminals and felons. Consequently, there is no need for local laws which only affect and disarm law-abiding citizens.

(6) Officials of the District of Columbia have indicated their intention to continue to unduly restrict lawful firearm possession and use by citizens of the District.

(7) Legislation is required to correct the District of Columbia's law in order to restore the fundamental rights of its citizens under the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution and thereby enhance public safety.

SEC. 3. REFORM D.C. COUNCIL'S AUTHORITY TO RESTRICT FIREARMS.

Section 4 of the Act entitled `An Act to prohibit the killing of wild birds and wild animals in the District of Columbia', approved June 30, 1906 (34 Stat. 809; sec. 1-303.43, D.C. Official Code) is amended by adding at the end the following: `Nothing in this section or any other provision of law shall authorize, or shall be construed to permit, the Council, the Mayor, or any governmental or regulatory authority of the District of Columbia to prohibit, constructively prohibit, or unduly burden the ability of persons not prohibited from possessing firearms under Federal law from acquiring, possessing in their homes or businesses, or using for sporting, self-protection or other lawful purposes, any firearm neither prohibited by Federal law nor subject to the National Firearms Act. The District of Columbia shall not have authority to enact laws or regulations that discourage or eliminate the private ownership or use of firearms.'.

SEC. 4. REPEAL D.C. SEMIAUTOMATIC BAN.

(a) In General- Section 101(10) of the Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975 (sec. 7-2501.01(10), D.C. Official Code) is amended to read as follows:

`(10) `Machine gun' means any firearm which shoots, is designed to shoot, or readily restored to shoot automatically, more than 1 shot without manual reloading by a single function of the trigger, and includes the frame or receiver of any such weapon, any part designed and intended solely and exclusively, or combination of parts designed and intended, for use in converting a weapon into a machine gun, and any combination of parts from which a machine gun can be assembled if such parts are in the possession or under the control of a person.'.

(b) Conforming Amendment to Provisions Setting Forth Criminal Penalties- Section 1(c) of the Act of July 8, 1932 (47 Stat. 651; sec. 22-4501(c), D.C. Official Code) is amended to read as follows:

`(c) `Machine gun', as used in this Act, has the meaning given such term in section 101(10) of the Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975.'.

SEC. 5. REPEAL REGISTRATION REQUIREMENT.

(a) Repeal of Requirement-

(1) IN GENERAL- Section 201(a) of the Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975 (sec. 7-2502.01(a), D.C. Official Code) is amended by striking `any firearm, unless' and all that follows through paragraph (3) and inserting the following: `any firearm described in subsection (c).'.

(2) DESCRIPTION OF FIREARMS REMAINING ILLEGAL- Section 201 of such Act (sec. 7-2502.01, D.C. Official Code) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

`(c) A firearm described in this subsection is any of the following:

`(1) A sawed-off shotgun.

`(2) A machine gun.

`(3) A short-barreled rifle.'.

(3) CONFORMING AMENDMENT- The heading of section 201 of such Act (sec. 7-2502.01, D.C. Official Code) is amended by striking `Registration requirements' and inserting `Firearm Possession'.

(b) Conforming Amendments to Firearms Control Regulations Act- The Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975 is amended as follows:

(1) Sections 202 through 211 (secs. 7-2502.02 through 7-2502.11, D.C. Official Code) are repealed.

(2) Section 101 (sec. 7-2501.01, D.C. Official Code) is amended by striking paragraph (13).

(3) Section 401 (sec. 7-2504.01, D.C. Official Code) is amended--

(A) in subsection (a), by striking `the District;' and all that follows and inserting the following: `the District, except that a person may engage in hand loading, reloading, or custom loading of ammunition for firearms lawfully possessed under this Act.'; and

(B) in subsection (b), by striking `which are unregisterable under section 202' and inserting `which are prohibited under section 201'.

(4) Section 402 (sec. 7-2504.02, D.C. Official Code) is amended--

(A) in subsection (a), by striking `Any person eligible to register a firearm' and all that follows through `such business,' and inserting the following: `Any person not otherwise prohibited from possessing or receiving a firearm under Federal or District law, or from being licensed under section 923 of title 18, United States Code,'; and

(B) in subsection (b), by amending paragraph (1) to read as follows:

`(1) The applicant's name;'.

(5) Section 403(b) (sec. 7-2504.03(b), D.C. Official Code) is amended by striking `registration certificate' and inserting `dealer's license'.

(6) Section 404(a)(3) (sec. 7-2504.04(a)(3)), D.C. Official Code) is amended--

(A) in subparagraph (B)(i), by striking `registration certificate number (if any) of the firearm,';

(B) in subparagraph (B)(iv), by striking `holding the registration certificate' and inserting `from whom it was received for repair';

(C) in subparagraph (C)(i), by striking `and registration certificate number (if any) of the firearm';

(D) in subparagraph (C)(ii), by striking `registration certificate number or'; and

(E) by striking subparagraphs (D) and (E).

(7) Section 406(c) (sec. 7-2504.06(c), D.C. Official Code) is amended to read as follows:

`(c) Within 45 days of a decision becoming effective which is unfavorable to a licensee or to an applicant for a dealer's license, the licensee or application shall--

`(1) lawfully remove from the District all destructive devices in his inventory, or peaceably surrender to the Chief all destructive devices in his inventory in the manner provided in section 705; and

`(2) lawfully dispose, to himself or to another, any firearms and ammunition in his inventory.'.

(8) Section 407(b) (sec. 7-2504.07(b), D.C. Official Code) is amended by striking `would not be eligible' and all that follows and inserting `is prohibited from possessing or receiving a firearm under Federal or District law.'.

(9) Section 502 (sec. 7-2505.02, D.C. Official Code) is amended--

(A) by amending subsection (a) to read as follows:

`(a) Any person or organization not prohibited from possessing or receiving a firearm under Federal or District law may sell or otherwise transfer ammunition or any firearm, except those which are prohibited under section 201, to a licensed dealer.';

(B) by amending subsection (c) to read as follows:

`(c) Any licensed dealer may sell or otherwise transfer a firearm to any person or organization not otherwise prohibited from possessing or receiving such firearm under Federal or District law.';

(C) in subsection (d), by striking paragraphs (2) and (3); and

(D) by striking subsection (e).

(10) Section 704 (sec. 7-2507.04, D.C. Official Code) is amended--

(A) in subsection (a), by striking `any registration certificate or' and inserting `a'; and

(B) in subsection (b), by striking `registration certificate,'.

(c) Other Conforming Amendments- Section 2(4) of the Illegal Firearm Sale and Distribution Strict Liability Act of 1992 (sec. 7-2531.01(2)(4), D.C. Official Code) is amended--

(1) in subparagraph (A), by striking `or ignoring proof of the purchaser's residence in the District of Columbia'; and

(2) in subparagraph (B), by striking `registration and'.

SEC. 6. REPEAL HANDGUN AMMUNITION BAN.

Section 601(3) of the Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975 (sec. 7-2506.01(3), D.C. Official Code) is amended by striking `is the holder of the valid registration certificate for' and inserting `owns'.

SEC. 7. RESTORE RIGHT OF SELF DEFENSE IN THE HOME.

Section 702 of the Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975 (sec. 7-2507.02, D.C. Official Code) is repealed.

SEC. 8. REMOVE CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR POSSESSION OF UNREGISTERED FIREARMS.

(a) In General- Section 706 of the Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975 (sec. 7-2507.06, D.C. Official Code) is amended--

(1) by striking `that:' and all that follows through `(1) A' and inserting `that a'; and

(2) by striking paragraph (2).

(b) Effective Date- The amendments made by subsection (a) shall apply with respect to violations occurring after the 60-day period which begins on the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 9. REMOVE CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR CARRYING A FIREARM IN ONE'S DWELLING OR OTHER PREMISES.

Section 4(a) of the Act of July 8, 1932 (47 Stat. 651; sec. 22-4504(a), D.C. Official Code) is amended--

(1) in the matter before paragraph (1), by striking `a pistol,' and inserting the following: `except in his dwelling house or place of business or on other land possessed by that person, whether loaded or unloaded, a pistol,'; and

(2) by striking `except that:' and all that follows through `(2) If the violation' and inserting `except that if the violation'.

SEC. 10. AUTHORIZING PURCHASES OF FIREARMS BY DISTRICT RESIDENTS.

Section 922 of title 18, United States Code, is amended in paragraph (b)(3) by inserting after `other than a State in which the licensee's place of business is located' the following: `, or to the sale or delivery of a handgun to a resident of the District of Columbia by a licensee whose place of business is located in Maryland or Virginia,'.
 
Do Not Use The Brady Link To Email Congress

They will see who it's from (Brady), they won't read it, and they will count it as a letter in support of Brady's maniacal position.
 
I'm sorry but are you guys really shocked that the Brady Campaign is lying? Think back to all the other B.S. they have put out and you realize this is just par for the course. We have to keep up our activism and the rebutting of their crazy fallacies (this one will be easy) until everyone sees them for the fools they are.

We are doing a great job so far and I look at this statement from them as a gift, use it accordingly.
 
I'm sorry but are you guys really shocked that the Bracy Campaign is lying. Think back to all the other B.S. they have put out and you realize this is just par for the course. We have top keep up our activism and the rebutting of their crazy fallacies (this one will be easy) until everyone sees them for the fools they are.

Were doing a greta job so far and I llok at this statement from them as a gift, use it accordingly.

He's right, it's a gift. Nothing we could do could more effectively undermine their credibility than this grotesque monument to Brady's stupidity.
 
Do Not Use The Brady Link To Email Congress

They will see who it's from (Brady), they won't read it, and they will count it as a letter in support of Brady's maniacal position.

I believe you're wrong. it's just an email generator that e-mails your congresscritters. The subject line is editable, and the body is entirely editable. It might have a brady return address, but the subject line should say what you want it to say. If the members of congress and their staff don't read the subject line, then shame on them.
 
The Brady bunch makes me sick. They just want to make false statements to make us law abiding gun owners look like criminals. I hate that with a passion. Don't they have anything better to do than to pick on us?
 
Don't they have anything better to do than to pick on us?

Hahah, no, they don't. It's their *job* to pick on us and paint us all as criminals. They are well paid and well funded to do EXACTLY THAT.
 
"I'm sorry but are you guys really shocked that the Brady Campaign is lying? Think back to all the other B.S. they have put out and you realize this is just par for the course"

No, not shocked. But you have to admit, this is a lot crazier than usual. Kiddies carrying .50 BMGs and AKs on the mall. The sad part is, most of the Brady faithful actually believe this nonsense.
 
csmkersh,

Be that the real, bonafied law, that makes its way to vote, then you my friend have been a messanger angel to lighten my day.

That bill sounds fantastic. :)
 
Hahah, no, they don't. It's their *job* to pick on us and paint us all as criminals. They are well paid and well funded to do EXACTLY THAT.



Yep I figured that was thier dirty little plan of attack. They will never stop until they get thier way.
 
Can this be called "affirmative action"?

I stole shamelessly from elChupacabra!, edited it enough so that it became a different letter, went to the Brady site, and sent my pro-6691 letter through their system.

They thanked me for joining in their protest. By reply mail, I sent a note to the effect that they had clearly not read what I had said.
 
It's definitely worse than other statements they have released but like I said look at it as a gift.

When I use a statement like this when discussing 2A issues it allows me to show how they distort the facts and continue to dispell many others they have "heard".

That is of course when your talking to sane and rational people, the Brady faithful I believe are beyond help.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top