Quote:
he worked on numerous proposals to help protect our families and communities from gun criminals and he stressed a coordinated approach that included both prevention and enforcement.
What's a "gun criminal"? Is this a criminal with a gun, or are they saying guns themselves are criminals?
Yeah, that line caused me to read it twice, but I really do think he meant a person who commits a criminal action while using a gun. Some people and most anti's are oblivious to how a gun functions, or, really, anything when it comes to guns. (Maybe some of the more devious ones have more intimate knowledge of guns, but that's another thread.) Anyway, like I said, they are afraid of guns. Ignorance breeds fear just like "familiarity breeds contempt." Fortunately, ignorance is curable; but, stupidity is terminable and not curable. Most antis wish to remain in the blissful state of ignorance which is the definition of stupidity.
On a side note, I wanted to start a thread but it has been rehashed over and over, so I will hijack this one temporarily and let it out and then forget about it. It is slightly on topic though. Had a first date last night. She's ninety pounds soaking wet, so her protection is a specifically trained Boxer named Bentley. When she was explaining the time and expense of setting up this "defense system," I asked her why not just get a pistol. She instantly sits back and crosses her arms, and says that she could never own a pistol. She did say that others can own them but not her. We're going out next week, so I think for a third or fourth date, a range trip is necessary if the weather will cooperate--been awfully cool lately.
Anyway, back on topic, Holder is a grabber and won't tell the truth in words but he will tell the truth in actions, so it is a wait and see situation. In the meantime, we have to e-mail, call, and write those "we" elected.