Broken 442

Status
Not open for further replies.

amprecon

Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2002
Messages
1,549
Location
TN
You know, as modern and sophisticated as we believe ourselves to be, with our "composite" space-aged mega-capacity Godzilla killing hand machines, we still find a place in our collections for the antiquated revolving curiosities that are mostly relegated to the lethality ranks with today's stun-guns by those not as educated as we.

I am a "self-inflicted" gun enthusiast and know my guns mostly inside and out, I can disassemble and reassemble them in the dark with one hand tied behind my back and with a cramp in my leg all the while.

However, as much as I would like my immediate family members (all of which are females) to become as intimate with my (our) firearms as I am, I find it a mission impossible. As much as they try to placate me by acting like they're interested I know that they just do not possess the genuine interest or desire to know them as I do.

There are just too many more important things to fill their girly heads with and guns just aren't near the top of that list. I've even preached the historical, political, existential importance of the firearm in our human condition, but to no avail.

So, in my frustration and lack of faith in their abilities to efficiently operate a hi-cap wonder-auto in time of need and panic, I "reduced" myself to purchasing this S&W 442 for them to use in the event they "found" that rare situation rear it's ugly head and they had to defend themselves quickly.

As I explained it to them, this particular firearm is a snub-nosed .38 with five rounds, it functions by merely aiming in the direction of the offender and squeezing the trigger, there are no other safeties, buttons, switches or gadgets, just aim and squeeze (5) times. It is the design pinnacle of firearm reliability I told them.

Recently at the range with the wife, we took this 442 to let her get the feel for it again since it had been awhile. I shot a cylinder full, reloaded and handed it to her, two rounds went downrange then she looked over at me and shook her head, I took the gun, squeezed the trigger and nothing happened. The cylinder was not rotating, I could manually rotate the cylinder for the next round to align, but it would not do it via the trigger pull.
Upon inspecting it I found what looked like the tip of the rotating pawl had broken off and it wasn't engaging the cutouts on the rear of the cylinder to make it rotate.

My wife flashed me the "so much for being the design pinnacle for reliability" look, you know that look.....? Anyway, it (the gun) was sent back to S&W for Warranty repair and am waiting (not impatiently) for it's return.
 
Suposedly the hand (you called it a "pawl"), is another one of those Metal Injected Molded (MIM) parts which is not only superior, but cost-effective too. Fortunately the word is that if it's going to fail, it should do so early on.

This report will make you feel better... :scrutiny: :rolleyes:
 
No doubt the factory will take care of the problem under warranty, but for the hand to simply break in an S&W personal defense revolver like a Model 442 is pretty darned bad, however infrequently it occurs. :eek:
 
It is very easy to replace the hand on a S&W revolver.

You can involve the warranty if you like. But, I'd see it as a personal challenge. I've ordered hands from S&W before. Cost, including shipping was about ten bucks. It will cost you a lot more than that if you have to pay shipping to to Blue-Label a handgun via UPS or FedEx. If you go through a FFL, Priority Mail (much cheaper) is permitted.
 
Smith & Wesson, unlike some others, is very good about shipping costs. If you have a warrantee problem they will e-mail you a shipping label, and the gun goes back on their dime. They also pay for the return costs. It's no fun having to send a gun back, but they are more then fair about taking care of the expense.
 
Is there any source for machined or cast replacements for the MIM parts, and if so wil it improve the relibility of an SD revolver?
 
For Smith & Wesson revolvers, no. If one objects to the current construction the only solution is to buy an earlier gun. A number of companies make replacement parts for 1911 style pistols. Other then that, what you buy is what you get. I would note that MIM parts seem to do well in guns that were designed to use them in the first place. What trouble there is comes when a manufacturer substitutes an MIM part in place of an older one in an effort to save money.

A broken MIM hand in a current S&W revolver is unusual, but if there was a seam at the top when the part was made this would explain what happened. The chances of this happening is about the same as getting hit with lightning.

But then, people do get hit with lightning... :scrutiny: :uhoh:
 
I guess anything can break, it appears the only way to ensure you always have a functional SD gun is to have a back-up. I can't imagine the odds of both going down at the same time.
 
Even the best made human objects break from time to time. Great CS & S&W. You'll have it back in no time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top