Browning A Bolt II 7mm rem mag

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have a Browning A-Bolt II Medallion in .300WSM (Wincehster Short Magnum) and a Browning X-Bolt Medallion in .308 Winchester.

I've had the A-Bolt much longer and have refined loads to provide tack-driving accuracy (I can cover three holes with a quarter at 100 yards consistently). Easy to reload for, short action, ballistics close to .300 Winchester Magnum. Bullet weights are more limited, though, with 150-180 grains being the recommended range. Heavier bullets have been loaded successfully but at the expense of powder capacity. I bought this rifle for long range deer/antelope hunting and I have a very fast and flat shooting 150 grain load that is extremely accurate and consistent (as mentioned above).

I have not had the X-bolt very long so I cannot comment on the accuracy potential, still working up loads for it. The X-Bolt has an easily removable rotary magazine that is all plastic (seems cheesy at first but it isn't). This is important in that they are very light, won't rattle in the pocket and won't rust. it is also the smoothest feeding of any magazine type that I have experienced. The X-Bolt also has the feature of being able to work the bolt with the safety on.

I love both rifles (and calibers) and would not hesitate to recommend them.

Dan
 
Kachok, again unsurpassable advice and input.

Idcurrie, I have actually looked at this article already and read through it a couple days ago. very helpful and well put together.

I have actually also looked at the chuck hawk articles comparing recoil in a very wide variety of calibers and different weight bullets for those calibers. I have been considering all the input that veeryone is giving and have been looking more now at non magnum calibers such as the 30-06, 308 win, and 270 win. these all seems like rifles i would love to own and i think i would be able to spend considerably more time out on the range practicing with one of these and working up loads when i begin reloading for them. And i also think that a limbsaver recoil pad would increase the time even more with these unlike the magnums.

I know i am jumping around a lot on you guys on which caliber rifle i want to get but i dont want to make a decision on a rifle in a week or even a month and then regret the choice i have made either because it kicks my butt up and down the range or because it doesnt have the oomph that i am looking for.

I am really greatful for all of the input that everyone is throwing my way and onestly it is helping a lot because it is giving me more information and knowlege plus it is helping me to get out there and find things out too that i probably never would have looked at or considered had i not gotten on this forum.
 
I have a Browning A-Bolt II Medallion in .300WSM (Wincehster Short Magnum) and a Browning X-Bolt Medallion in .308 Winchester.

I've had the A-Bolt much longer and have refined loads to provide tack-driving accuracy (I can cover three holes with a quarter at 100 yards consistently). Easy to reload for, short action, ballistics close to .300 Winchester Magnum. Bullet weights are more limited, though, with 150-180 grains being the recommended range. Heavier bullets have been loaded successfully but at the expense of powder capacity. I bought this rifle for long range deer/antelope hunting and I have a very fast and flat shooting 150 grain load that is extremely accurate and consistent (as mentioned above).

I have not had the X-bolt very long so I cannot comment on the accuracy potential, still working up loads for it. The X-Bolt has an easily removable rotary magazine that is all plastic (seems cheesy at first but it isn't). This is important in that they are very light, won't rattle in the pocket and won't rust. it is also the smoothest feeding of any magazine type that I have experienced. The X-Bolt also has the feature of being able to work the bolt with the safety on.

I love both rifles (and calibers) and would not hesitate to recommend them
.

Dan thanks for that info i have yet to look at the X bolt but i will be taking a look at it very soon (i.e. right now). I love hearing from guys who have the rifles i am looking at and ones i have yet to look at and can compare both with unbiase opinions for each.
 
While having "enough" power is very important consider this.
Hunters in Russia consider the 7.62x54 to be excessivly powerful for bear hunting! In reality it has less punch then a 30-06, closer to a 308.
Hunters in much of Europe hunt elk and moose with the seemingly puney 6.5x55, a recent survay was done and the hunters using the little Sweed had nearly identical recovery rates as those using 338 win mag!
Often hunters choose a cartrage that fits thier personalty rather then their hunting needs. A friend of mine who can hardly hit a deer at 100yds (missed two last year) keeps talking about how much he wants a 338 Lapua!
I don't know how big the game is in your neck of the woods, and I am not saying that is you, just don't fall into that trap, I did and it gets expensive and frustrating.
 
Great story and i know what your talking about it is often calledd (little man syndrom). Im not really in that catagory i just like big ass guns.

That said i am considering more and more what i want to actually spend in realistic situations on ammo. I am going to be reloading whatever caliber i decide to get but even in that aspect it can be exspensive with the larger caliber rifles. I like to shoot and the cheaper the ammo is for what i get the more i can shoot .

In my home state of Indiana we cant even use high powered rifles. the only long rifle we can use is if it is a ound that is made in a handgun also. like .44 mag and .357 these are also very decent rounds though for the deer that we encounter and the ranges at which we encounter deer in Indiana.

However i am not living in Indiana anymore since i joined the military i was stationed in texas and then went to kentucky and here in the year or less i will be moving back to texas so i will have plenty of deer to shoot at and i will be making trips up into New Mexico to see if i cant take an elk.
 
Cool, I was Army and lived in Texas for many years. If you go out west you might just need a magnum, you can see for miles in any direction, and so can the big mule deer LOL. Anywhere else in the state you can hunt with a revolver, from the panhandle to the hill country Texas is a very brushy place.
Oh another thing I forgot to address. You seem to be under the imression that the 300 mags are suitable for larger animals then a 30-06. This is not as big a difference as the recoil would imply. If I am hunting something that is to big for my 308/30-06 I am not reaching for a faster .30 I am reaching for a much larger caliber, 338 WM, 9.3x64, or 375 Ruger.
 
I live in very far northern Canada. The deer here are much larger than what you'd find in the U.S.A. The elk are very large and the Moose even more so.

I shoot a 30'06 although I've tried them all. My wife uses a 270. Both do the job very, very well.

A friend of mine purchased a rifle and we went about 6 hours even further north in pursuit of a trophy Elk. The locals in one of the Restaurants we stopped at asked what we were carrying. They laughed when they heard my friend was carrying a 300 Winmag and asked "what do you need that thing for?"

Personally, I consider it a mark of an experienced and skilled hunter to carry a non-magnum caliber.

Before going for a 300wm, definitely look at some reloading manuals. You'll find that to make the same velocity as a 30'06 or 308, the 300wm has to use much more powder.

Also consider that the 300wm is the only cartridge that has a neck length which is less than the diameter of the bullet. This means that it is particularly advisable to crimp for this cartridge since bullets might get pushed back into the case while the cartridge is in the magazine under recoil. The neck simply doesn't provide enough bearing surface as other cartridges.

Also to consider, 300wm and 7mm rem mag tend to have lesser case life when reloading. Generally, the belt doesn't really do anything because hand loaders headspace off the shoulder rather than the belt. The problem with the belt is that it doesn't really allow for proper full length sizing. Sometimes a small 'bulge' will form just above the belt making it impossible to chamber the round.

Most people who reload for the 300wm will neck size their brass but even they have to have their shoulders pushed back sometimes.

All in all, it's just a huge pain in the ass to properly reload for the 300wm as compared to the 30'06, 308, 270 etc.

300wm factory ammo costs more. Reloading for 300wm costs more because your brass doesn't last as long and it requires more powder to do the same thing.

Also worth noting, from experience, any kind of cartridge holder that you buy from, say, MTM or the like will be unwieldy large in 300wm/7mmrm. Regular size cartrige holders are simply easier to find and easier to handle and work with.
 
Last edited:
Idcurrie, Thanks for that awesome insight and the story. I am very highly considering those non magnums now like i mentioned in one of my earlier posts such as the 308, 270 and 30-06. These seem to be much more manageable for range use and field use. I do like the big guns cause they make a big bang but i need something that is practical for going out and throwinng lead down range on a regular bases and also going out and knocking down the animal of choice.
 
All great points but i will put this out there also i am a sgt in the military and as far as shooting goes all i do is technique. I have my shooting abilities down and i know what i am capable of.

Secondly the recoil is not something i am a stranger too either. And when it comes to reletless practice to make something perfect i can endur the discomfort long enough to get it right until i cant get it wrong.

Also please dont take this as me being cocky or arrogant. I greatly appreciate all of your input and will consider all factors and weapons that are put forth.

Im looking for those larger caliber magnums because i dont make insane amounts of money that allow me to buy a rifle for every different hunting situation that there is. That being sad i want something that i know can handle the large game animals as well as be downloaded for the medium game even if it is still a little over kill.




With all due respect, I have heard many military men cite their shooting of the SAW and M240 as 'able to handle the recoil'

Unfortunately, that is an apple-to-oranges comparison. Please tell us what experience you have in shooting that will prepare you for the recoil of a 300 RUM, 300 Winmag, or 7mm Remmag.

Regarding the attitude of 'downloading' for medium game and target shooting...it just doesn't happen that way. People who run two loads mentally default to the performance of the more often shot one when they are in the midst of a hunting situation, in addition to the trouble of constantly re-zeroing as you switch between loads as I mentioned on your other thread.

I know where you are coming from as far as a rifle and price. The idea is to spend more now and make ONE purchase that will last a lifetime and can be used on all hunting situations.

But that's a false premise. For starters, ever heard the saying 'Jack of all trades master of none'? That's what you are setting yourself up for. You are attempting to select a gun that is capable of doing the rare 1% of hunting but in the process giving yourself a big handicap for the more common 99% of hunting.

Second if you can afford to buy one rifle now, you can probably afford to buy one more rifle 5-10 years from now. Further, if this isn't true, then you probably cannot afford the OTHER costs associated with the rare 1% of hunting you are considering when buying your gun. For instance, if a hunter wants to make a 500 yard shot, then he should realize that his ammo consumption to gain and maintain that level of skill is going to be more than the price of a decent rifle...even if that shooter also hand-loads. Most elk hunters own ATVs or horses for getting out beyond the roads and for hauling out the animal once shot. (I do NOT consider an elk hunter who just packs out the rack, or even who just packs out 50 pounds of meat leaving 500 pounds to rot to be an ethical hunter). Heck I just looked it up and a non-resident New Mexico Bull Elk license is $550 all by itself.

Third, people are allowed to sell rifles they 'outgrow'...OR set them aside to be used by a future wife, son, or daughter.

Fourth, one one side of shooting you have technique which is the same if you are shooting a 22, 223, 30-06, or a 460 weatherby. But you also have recoil management where you need to worry about developing a flinch, being able to get a fast follow-up shot, etc etc. In that way shooting is like lifting weights...you work up to the heavier stuff. Think about how useful it would be for a kid who wants to start lifting weights to put 200 pounds on the bar and press against it every day hoping that some day he will lift it vs starting at 100 and working his way up. You don't have to start by lifting 10 pounds (22 LR rifle) but it is unwise to start at 200 pounds (7mm remmag, 300 winmag).

I think you'd be much better off getting a DECENT gun in a low recoiling caliber matched with a good scope with the intent of it being your learning gun plus the gun your wife, son, or daughter will learn on if/when they want to take up hunting at your side.

In this regard, I recommend you get a Weatherby Vanguard Synthetic in 25-06 or a Marlin XS 7 in 243, Something in the $400 price range and top it off with a $150 scope. Learn with it. Then keep it for a wife/son/daughter or sell it for 75% of your initial investment. Consider that $100 to $200 'investment' loss you will take when you sell it to be an investment in rifle #2. (After all, you seem the type that if you were asking about rifle model A for $700 if people here heavily recommended rifle model B for $850 to be much superior, that you'd pay the extra $150, right?)

Or heck, get yourself a Mosin Nagant for $99.99. People say they are 'inaccurate' but even an inaccurate Mosin is in my experience capable of 5 MOA accuracy, which is plenty good for learning on.

I know i am jumping around a lot on you guys on which caliber rifle i want to get but i dont want to make a decision on a rifle in a week or even a month and then regret the choice i have made either because it kicks my butt up and down the range or because it doesnt have the oomph that i am looking for.

I am glad you made the very reasonable decision to move to a 270, 308, or 30-06. However everything I said above still holds. If you don't like the gun you can sell it and get 75% of your investment back.

Now using some information from your posts, let's be honest. It seems like you are going to be doing the vast majority of your hunting for the next 5 years in Texas, hunting for white-tail deer and similar sized game. Texas whitetails are known to be small. It's one of the few places where hunting deer with a 223 is a reasonable option especially for a beginner. Hunting whitetails in Texas, to be successful, you don't look for a ton of power you look for a flat shooting cartridge. I STRONGLY recommend a 243, 25-06, or similar round for Texas Whitetail hunting. This isn't even a 'new guy should avoid killer recoil' thing, this is simply 'the tool that seems to work best'. The fact that the 243 and 25-06 are light recoiling numbers great to learn on is a happy coincidence. Also, there is no whitetail deer on this continent that a 243 with a quality bullet can't drop. 25-06 is considered the 'minimum' for elk, so power isn't going to be a factor no matter where you end up.

When you reach the point in your life where you can really drop $2000 on a hunting trip, then you'll also be at a point in your life where you can buy a dedicated elk rifle (or dedicated whatever rifle for whatever specialty hunt you are going to do)
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top