Bat Masterson
Member
It doesn't look right to me. Can someone who has a Baby help confirm or deny my suspicion? Thanks!
Last edited:
Browning Baby Magazine: Does this look right?
- Thread starter Bat Masterson
- Start date
- Status
Shadow 7D
Member
while I know it's not technically correct
does if feed reliably?
honestly that most of what I'm concerned about
historic value is second, except for a few, then I shoot the replacement mags and keep the original as pristine as possible.
does if feed reliably?
honestly that most of what I'm concerned about
historic value is second, except for a few, then I shoot the replacement mags and keep the original as pristine as possible.
Bat Masterson
Member
It doesn't feed well, so I have a Mecgar on order. If it has been modified then it does not have historic value either.
Frank Exchange Of Views
Member
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2004
- Messages
- 40
From the photo looks like your magazine is broken; it is missing a chunk out of the rear, right corner.
I checked my Baby magazines to verify and they all have complete left and right rear corners on them.
I checked my Baby magazines to verify and they all have complete left and right rear corners on them.
Bat Masterson
Member
Even if it was modified by a Cleveland Garfield in order to increase the reliability of his personal carry gun with the ammo produced in the day?
Who is Cleveland Garfield? Am I missing something?
Bat Masterson
Member
Thank you, that's what I expected. The magazine actually looks like someone deliberately modified it by cutting the back corner and part of the feed lip; one would presume that this was done in an attempt to make the pistol more reliable. It kind of looks like a DYI job done with a dremel, followed-up with a pair of pliers.
- Status
